Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Step Transition Lookahead

Abstract

We study reinforcement learning (RL) with transition look-ahead, where the agent may observe which states would be visited upon playing any sequence of actions before deciding its course of action. Although look-ahead can substantially improve achievable performance, [1] showed that optimal planning with multi-step transition look-ahead is NP-hard. However, this hardness was established using a discount factor close to one. It was therefore unknown whether the problem remains hard for every discount factor, and whether near-optimal planning can nevertheless be performed efficiently. We resolve both questions. First, we show that for every fixed discount factor, exact planning remains NP-hard. Second, we introduce a randomized polynomial-time approximation scheme for every fixed look-ahead depth. Third, we extend our approach to account for unknown transitions. We empirically validate the soundness of our results on the wind-farm storage-control benchmark of [2], showing that our approach, optimally accounting for -step look-ahead information, offers substantially better performance than existing algorithms. [1] Corentin Pla, Hugo Richard, Marc Abeille, Nadav Merlis, Vianney Perchet : On the Hardness of Reinforcement Learning with Transition Look-Ahead [2] Chenbei Lu, Zaiwei Chen, Tongxin Li, Chenye Wu, Adam Wierman : Reinforcement Learning with Imperfect Transition Predictions: A Bellman-Jensen Approach

Related

  1. Optimal Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning
    Zijun Chen, Zihan Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Optimal Value Inference for Reinforcement Learning
    Nan Lu, Ethan Lee, Ruicheng Ao +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Optimal Transport Meets Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
    Yujie Zhu, Charles A. Hepburn, Matthew Thorpe +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Near-Optimal Sample Complexity for Recursive Entropic Risk Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model
    Amirparsa Bahrami, Oliver Mortensen, Mohammad Sadegh Talebi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Augmented Patient Preference Incorporated Reinforcement Learning (APP-RL) to Estimate the Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regime
    Yingchao Zhong, Lu Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{pla2026nearoptimal,
  title = {{Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Step Transition Lookahead}},
  author = {Corentin Pla and Hugo Richard and Marc Abeille and Vianney Perchet},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.11807},
  eprint = {2609.11807},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11807},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Step Transition Lookahead
AU  - Corentin Pla
AU  - Hugo Richard
AU  - Marc Abeille
AU  - Vianney Perchet
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.11807
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11807
AB  - We study reinforcement learning (RL) with transition look-ahead, where the agent may observe which states would be visited upon playing any sequence of actions before deciding its course of action. Although look-ahead can substantially improve achievable performance, [1] showed that optimal planning with multi-step transition look-ahead is NP-hard. However, this hardness was established using a discount factor close to one. It was therefore unknown whether the problem remains hard for every discount factor, and whether near-optimal planning can nevertheless be performed efficiently. We resolve both questions. First, we show that for every fixed discount factor, exact planning remains NP-hard. Second, we introduce a randomized polynomial-time approximation scheme for every fixed look-ahead depth. Third, we extend our approach to account for unknown transitions. We empirically validate the soundness of our results on the wind-farm storage-control benchmark of [2], showing that our approach, optimally accounting for -step look-ahead information, offers substantially better performance than existing algorithms. [1] Corentin Pla, Hugo Richard, Marc Abeille, Nadav Merlis, Vianney Perchet : On the Hardness of Reinforcement Learning with Transition Look-Ahead [2] Chenbei Lu, Zaiwei Chen, Tongxin Li, Chenye Wu, Adam Wierman : Reinforcement Learning with Imperfect Transition Predictions: A Bellman-Jensen Approach
ER  -