Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

A charge selection rule fixes what a squeezed-light reservoir computer can compute and afford

Abstract

Reading an optical quantum reservoir costs repetitions growing super-exponentially with feature order: what it can afford is set by its detector, not its optics. For reservoirs encoding data in a parametric pump's phase, one conservation law fixes what is readable and what it costs. Pairwise photon exchange conserves an integer phase charge: across an ensemble of input masks, order-D readout reaches exactly the assemblies of at most D unit-charge kernels; degree-one homodyne readout is universal for fading-memory functionals along weak-squeezing families, at shot cost polynomial in accuracy; and at fixed squeezing no finite degree reaches every sector, at a computable distance. Nonlinearity sits in the optics, not the detector, whose per-shot variance is fixed at every order. In a hardware-faithful digital twin-no device was built-the rule is visible: on an open RF corpus a displacement-encoded control at identical photon number loses 17.7 accuracy points, as the charge algebra predicts.

Related

  1. Model selection for imperfect computer codes under discrepancy-aware calibration: application to IATE closure modelling
    Sanae Janati Idrissi, Maria Giovanna Rodio, Pietro Marco Congedo
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsHAL
  2. Compute-Optimal Pretrain--Fine-tune in Ridge Gradient Descent
    Alex Buna, Fanghui Liu, Patrick Rebeschini
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Compute-Constrained Safety Filters with Neuromorphic Event Triggering
    Tochukwu E. Ogri, Opeyemi Owolabi, Luke Fina +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Graph Coarsening Enables Escaping Local Optima in Compute-Constrained Nonconvex MAX-CUT
    M. Harper Langston, Pierre-David Letourneau, Dalton Jones +7
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Relative entropy in quantum field theory: the case of squeezed fermions
    Markus B. Fröb
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{soh2026charge,
  title = {{A charge selection rule fixes what a squeezed-light reservoir computer can compute and afford}},
  author = {Daniel Soh},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.19668},
  eprint = {2608.19668},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19668},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A charge selection rule fixes what a squeezed-light reservoir computer can compute and afford
AU  - Daniel Soh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.19668
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19668
AB  - Reading an optical quantum reservoir costs repetitions growing super-exponentially with feature order: what it can afford is set by its detector, not its optics. For reservoirs encoding data in a parametric pump's phase, one conservation law fixes what is readable and what it costs. Pairwise photon exchange conserves an integer phase charge: across an ensemble of input masks, order-D readout reaches exactly the assemblies of at most D unit-charge kernels; degree-one homodyne readout is universal for fading-memory functionals along weak-squeezing families, at shot cost polynomial in accuracy; and at fixed squeezing no finite degree reaches every sector, at a computable distance. Nonlinearity sits in the optics, not the detector, whose per-shot variance is fixed at every order. In a hardware-faithful digital twin-no device was built-the rule is visible: on an open RF corpus a displacement-encoded control at identical photon number loses 17.7 accuracy points, as the charge algebra predicts.
ER  -