Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Communications Engineering

Network architecture follows coupling in multiphysics systems: single vs. multiple branches in DeepONet and S-DeepONet

5 affiliations
  1. 1National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL USA
  2. 2The Grainger College of Engineering, Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL USA
  3. 3The Grainger College of Engineering, Nuclear, Plasma & Radiological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL USA
  4. 4Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS USA
  5. 5Civil and Urban Engineering Department, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Abstract

Real-time prediction of complex physical systems requires surrogate models that learn from data while representing strong multiphysics coupling. Deep Operator Networks have shown success in single-physics problems, yet their effectiveness in capturing nonlinear interactions in coupled systems (such as thermo-mechanical or electro-thermal coupling) remains underexplored. Here we pose a practical question: should the architecture of a neural operator reflect the strength of physical coupling it aims to model? We compare single-branch and multi-branch designs, in both feedforward and sequential recurrent forms, across three representative systems: a reaction-diffusion problem with heterogeneous sources, a nonlinear thermo-electrical problem with temperature-dependent conductivity and Joule heating, and a viscoplastic thermo-mechanical model of steel solidification. Single-branch networks consistently outperform multi-branch variants in tightly coupled regimes by encouraging shared latent representations, whereas multi-branch designs remain favorable for decoupled or single-physics tasks. Once trained, these surrogates deliver full-field predictions up to 1.8 × 104 times faster than physics-based solvers.

Related

  1. A multiphysics-coupled DeepONet framework for predicting sodium dendrite growth in wide-temperature sodium-ion capacitors
    Yifan Hao, Jing Yang
    Electrochemistry CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatistical & nonlinear physicsCrossref
  2. QPI-DeepONet-MAC: A Scalable and Stable Hybrid Classical-Quantum Architecture for Physics-Informed Deep Operator Networks
    Said Lantigua, José Valencia, Gilson Giraldi +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Ferroelectric Switching in ZnO/Zn1-xMgxO Heterostructures: Atomistic Insights into Interfacial Coupling and Layer Architecture
    Alireza Sepehrinezhad, Ali Mohammadi Dinani, Ece Gunay +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Coherent and dissipative coupling of multiple photon-magnon hybrids in a chiral microwave resonator
    Supanat Chantarattana, Charlie W. F. Freeman, Daniel Prestwood +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Interest of Multiphysics and Multilevel Simulation Approaches to Enhance the Machining Process
    Matthieu Rauch, Jean-Yves Hascoët
    Advanced Materials ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text3 citedGeneral physicsHAL
BibTeX
@article{park2026network,
  title = {{Network architecture follows coupling in multiphysics systems: single vs. multiple branches in DeepONet and S-DeepONet}},
  author = {Jaewan Park and Kazuma Kobayashi and Qibang Liu and Diab Abueidda and Seid Koric and Syed Bahauddin Alam},
  journal = {Communications Engineering},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1038/s44172-026-00714-4},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-026-00714-4},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Network architecture follows coupling in multiphysics systems: single vs. multiple branches in DeepONet and S-DeepONet
AU  - Jaewan Park
AU  - Kazuma Kobayashi
AU  - Qibang Liu
AU  - Diab Abueidda
AU  - Seid Koric
AU  - Syed Bahauddin Alam
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/03
JO  - Communications Engineering
DO  - 10.1038/s44172-026-00714-4
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-026-00714-4
AB  - Real-time prediction of complex physical systems requires surrogate models that learn from data while representing strong multiphysics coupling. Deep Operator Networks have shown success in single-physics problems, yet their effectiveness in capturing nonlinear interactions in coupled systems (such as thermo-mechanical or electro-thermal coupling) remains underexplored. Here we pose a practical question: should the architecture of a neural operator reflect the strength of physical coupling it aims to model? We compare single-branch and multi-branch designs, in both feedforward and sequential recurrent forms, across three representative systems: a reaction-diffusion problem with heterogeneous sources, a nonlinear thermo-electrical problem with temperature-dependent conductivity and Joule heating, and a viscoplastic thermo-mechanical model of steel solidification. Single-branch networks consistently outperform multi-branch variants in tightly coupled regimes by encouraging shared latent representations, whereas multi-branch designs remain favorable for decoupled or single-physics tasks. Once trained, these surrogates deliver full-field predictions up to 1.8 × 104 times faster than physics-based solvers.
SN  - 2731-3395
ER  -