Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0HAL

Genetic determinism and inheritance of differential DNA methylation profiles across three successive generations in quail.

Abstract

Environmental exposures can induce epigenetic modifications that persist across generations, potentially contributing to the transmission of environmentally-induced phenotypes. However, the extent to which such persistence of molecular changes are maintained independently of genetic mechanisms remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the evolution and genetic determinism of DNA methylation (DNAm) variation across three successive generations of Japanese quails (G0 to G2) belonging to two epilines, defined according to whether their female ancestor had received genistein supplementation (epi+) or not (epi-). Using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), we characterised CpG methylation patterns and identified differentially methylated cytosines (DMCs) and regions (DMRs) between control and genistein-supplemented epilines. Out of 112,745 CpG sites analysed, no DMCs or DMRs were detected between epilines in the first generation following exposure (G0), whereas 621 DMCs (36 DMRs) were identified in G1, and 1,381 DMCs (101 DMRs) in G2. Despite this progressive increase of differential methylation sites, mean differences in methylation rate between epilines were globally small. Similarly, genome-wide genetic differentiation between epilines was very limited. Overall, SNP-based heritability of DNA methylation was 0.19 indicating that genetic variation accounted for only a small part of the global variation of DNAm levels. By contrast, DNAm at differentially methylated CpG sites was extensively under genetic control, with a mean SNP-based heritability > 0.5, and meQTL analysis further identified significant associations between SNPs and methylation levels. Together, these results indicate that local DNAm differentiation in quail is under substantial genetic regulation, while the limited genetic differentiation between groups suggests that genetic variation alone can not fully explain the progressive accumulation of methylation differences following an ancestral exposure to genistein. These results support DNAm as a plausible molecular candidate mechanism in the multigenerational response to environmental exposure and highlight the complex interplay between genetic and epigenetic regulations in the inheritance of phenotypes.

Related

  1. Differential Orthopedia Homeobox expression in pulmonary carcinoids is associated with changes in DNA methylation
    Laura Moonen, Lise Mangiante, Daphne J G Leunissen +12
    International Journal of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text15 citedGeneral biologyOncologyHAL
  2. Static Expression of Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes Across Life‐Stages, Generations and Tissues in a Songbird
    Samantha Mellinger, Lars Råberg, Anna Drews +4
    Molecular ecologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
  3. A single meiotic product dominates inheritance in Mucor circinelloides
    Carlos Pérez-Arques, María Isabel Navarro-Mendoza, Ziyan Xu +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxivPMC
  4. Familial epilepsy in Algeria: Clinical features and inheritance profiles
    Amina Chentouf, Aïcha Dahdouh, Michel Guipponi +4
    Seizure - European Journal of EpilepsyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text8 citedGeneral biologyPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  5. Chloroplast Genome Assembly and Genetic Structure Analysis of Coffea arabica L. Based on Maternal Inheritance Markers
    Yixian Wu, Xiaoyun Gu, Yaqi Li +3
    GenesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{rousse2026genetic,
  title = {{Genetic determinism and inheritance of differential DNA methylation profiles across three successive generations in quail.}},
  author = {Stacy Rousse and Sophie Leroux and Remi Seraphin and David Gourichon and Marta Godia and Ole Madsen and Sandrine Lagarrigue and Tatiana Zerjal and Frederique Pitel and Sonia Eynard},
  howpublished = {HAL},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.16.751955},
  url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05760911v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Genetic determinism and inheritance of differential DNA methylation profiles across three successive generations in quail.
AU  - Stacy Rousse
AU  - Sophie Leroux
AU  - Remi Seraphin
AU  - David Gourichon
AU  - Marta Godia
AU  - Ole Madsen
AU  - Sandrine Lagarrigue
AU  - Tatiana Zerjal
AU  - Frederique Pitel
AU  - Sonia Eynard
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
PB  - HAL
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.16.751955
UR  - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05760911v1
AB  - Environmental exposures can induce epigenetic modifications that persist across generations, potentially contributing to the transmission of environmentally-induced phenotypes. However, the extent to which such persistence of molecular changes are maintained independently of genetic mechanisms remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the evolution and genetic determinism of DNA methylation (DNAm) variation across three successive generations of Japanese quails (G0 to G2) belonging to two epilines, defined according to whether their female ancestor had received genistein supplementation (epi+) or not (epi-). Using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), we characterised CpG methylation patterns and identified differentially methylated cytosines (DMCs) and regions (DMRs) between control and genistein-supplemented epilines. Out of 112,745 CpG sites analysed, no DMCs or DMRs were detected between epilines in the first generation following exposure (G0), whereas 621 DMCs (36 DMRs) were identified in G1, and 1,381 DMCs (101 DMRs) in G2. Despite this progressive increase of differential methylation sites, mean differences in methylation rate between epilines were globally small. Similarly, genome-wide genetic differentiation between epilines was very limited. Overall, SNP-based heritability of DNA methylation was 0.19 indicating that genetic variation accounted for only a small part of the global variation of DNAm levels. By contrast, DNAm at differentially methylated CpG sites was extensively under genetic control, with a mean SNP-based heritability > 0.5, and meQTL analysis further identified significant associations between SNPs and methylation levels. Together, these results indicate that local DNAm differentiation in quail is under substantial genetic regulation, while the limited genetic differentiation between groups suggests that genetic variation alone can not fully explain the progressive accumulation of methylation differences following an ancestral exposure to genistein. These results support DNAm as a plausible molecular candidate mechanism in the multigenerational response to environmental exposure and highlight the complex interplay between genetic and epigenetic regulations in the inheritance of phenotypes.
ER  -