Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The Astrophysical Journal

Can MHD Oscillations Modulate Quasi-periodic Plasma Release from Coronal Streamers?

  1. 1Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute
  2. 2Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam

Abstract

Periodic density structures (PDS) in the slow solar wind are associated with quasi-periodic plasma release from coronal streamer and open–closed boundary regions, but the origin of their organization remains uncertain. We distinguish the process that releases plasma from the process that sets or modifies its cadence. In the proposed source–modulator framework, S-Web, interchange, cusp, or current-sheet reconnection releases the plasma, while MHD responses may modulate density or release rate. An observation-informed parameter-space analysis gives compact slow-mode periods of about 22–231 minutes; reproducing 80–130 minutes requires an effective path length of 0.35–1.20 R ⊙ . In a classical top-hat cylinder with L / a = 5–50 and ρ i / ρ e = 1.6–2.5, the fundamental fast sausage mode is not trapped and the minimum trapped harmonic is approximately n = 4–50. A transverse fast-timescale benchmark based on a = 0.10–0.45 R ⊙ and outer-coronal fast speeds of 250–530 km s ⁻¹ gives 5.7–55 minutes. A corresponding fast-interface proxy gives 4.4–93 minutes, but is not a current-sheet eigenmode solution. Kink responses are constrained empirically rather than by inserting observer-frame propagation speeds into a standing-mode formula: one COR1 event showed a 25 minute pulse, whereas a LASCO/COR2 survey found global streamer-wave periods of 2–8 hr, observer-frame speeds of 360–740 km s ⁻¹ , and only one or two visible cycles. Among the candidates considered here, compact slow modes are therefore the best-constrained stable compressive modulators; confirming their role requires further constraints on longitudinal reflection and damping. Surface/current-sheet responses remain high-priority coupling candidates but require a sheet-specific dispersion relation; kink responses are transient geometric candidates; and tearing/plasmoid formation remains a strong intrinsic reconnection-driven alternative.

Related

  1. Oblique kink waves in solar coronal streamers
    Aleksandr V. Rubtsov, Valery M. Nakariakov, Dmitri Yu. Klimushkin +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsPlasma physicsarXiv
  2. Deriving the Continuous β-FPUT Model for Decayless Solar Coronal Oscillations Directly from Resistive MHD
    D. Tsiklauri
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textSolar & stellar physicsPlasma physicsarXiv
  3. Dynamics, ringdown, and accretion-driven multiple quasi-periodic oscillations of Kerr–Bertotti–Robinson black holes
    Ghulam Mustafa, Orhan Dönmez, Dhruba Jyoti Gogoi +3
    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text8 citedCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsOpenAlex
  4. Gamma-ray Quasi-periodic Oscillations in the Changing Look Blazar B2 1420+326 (OQ 334)
    Sunanda, Shubham Kishore, Alok C. Gupta
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsarXiv
  5. A search for periodic active galactic nucleus variability in Gaia Data Release 3
    P. Huijse, J. Davelaar, J. De Ridder +2
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsGalaxiesCrossref
BibTeX
@article{podladchikova2026oscillations,
  title = {{Can MHD Oscillations Modulate Quasi-periodic Plasma Release from Coronal Streamers?}},
  author = {O. Podladchikova},
  journal = {The Astrophysical Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aea4ac},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aea4ac},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Can MHD Oscillations Modulate Quasi-periodic Plasma Release from Coronal Streamers?
AU  - O. Podladchikova
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - The Astrophysical Journal
DO  - 10.3847/1538-4357/aea4ac
UR  - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aea4ac
AB  - Periodic density structures (PDS) in the slow solar wind are associated with quasi-periodic plasma release from coronal streamer and open–closed boundary regions, but the origin of their organization remains uncertain. We distinguish the process that releases plasma from the process that sets or modifies its cadence. In the proposed source–modulator framework, S-Web, interchange, cusp, or current-sheet reconnection releases the plasma, while MHD responses may modulate density or release rate. An observation-informed parameter-space analysis gives compact slow-mode periods of about 22–231 minutes; reproducing 80–130 minutes requires an effective path length of 0.35–1.20 R ⊙ . In a classical top-hat cylinder with L / a = 5–50 and ρ i / ρ e = 1.6–2.5, the fundamental fast sausage mode is not trapped and the minimum trapped harmonic is approximately n = 4–50. A transverse fast-timescale benchmark based on a = 0.10–0.45 R ⊙ and outer-coronal fast speeds of 250–530 km s ⁻¹ gives 5.7–55 minutes. A corresponding fast-interface proxy gives 4.4–93 minutes, but is not a current-sheet eigenmode solution. Kink responses are constrained empirically rather than by inserting observer-frame propagation speeds into a standing-mode formula: one COR1 event showed a 25 minute pulse, whereas a LASCO/COR2 survey found global streamer-wave periods of 2–8 hr, observer-frame speeds of 360–740 km s ⁻¹ , and only one or two visible cycles. Among the candidates considered here, compact slow modes are therefore the best-constrained stable compressive modulators; confirming their role requires further constraints on longitudinal reflection and damping. Surface/current-sheet responses remain high-priority coupling candidates but require a sheet-specific dispersion relation; kink responses are transient geometric candidates; and tearing/plasmoid formation remains a strong intrinsic reconnection-driven alternative.
SN  - 1538-4357
SN  - 0004-637X
ER  -