Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Ball Rigidity of Local Minimizing Domains for the Best Fractional Sobolev Constant: The Subquadratic Case

Abstract

After Corollary 1.3 in Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations 60 (2021), Paper 231, Djitte, Fall, and Weth asked whether, when 1<p<2, a volume-constrained local minimizing domain for the best fractional Sobolev constant must still be a ball. This paper solves that problem. Let 0<s<1, 1<p<2, and let Ω⊂ℝN be a bounded C3 domain. If Ω is a local minimizing domain for λs,p(Ω)=inf[u]s2:u∈ℋ*0s(Ω), |u|*Lp(Ω)=1 under smooth volume-preserving deformations, then Ω is a ball. The proof first uses the fractional Hadamard formula to reduce shape minimality to the overdetermined boundary condition u/δs=C0. To overcome the moving-plane obstruction caused by the failure of up−1 to be Lipschitz at zero, we establish a weighted singular narrow-domain maximum principle whose absorption factor is exactly the sp/N power of the measure of the negative set. The difficulty at a corner is resolved by a finite boundary expansion: setting ρ=sp, the boundary quotient is composed of finitely many constant-coefficient normal powers δkρ and a C1,ε remainder; when kρ=1, the unique resonant correction is δlogδ. This expansion makes all lower-order normal terms on the two sides of an orthogonal corner cancel, thereby yielding the first-order tangential vanishing required by the moving-plane corner lemma. The method does not require the domain to be convex and covers the full range 0<s<1 and 1<p<2.

Related

  1. Biholomorphic rigidity and symmetry breaking for domains with Bergman metric of constant positive holomorphic sectional curvature
    Gordon Heier, Ravi Mudaliar, Haotian Zuo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  2. Comparison principles and symmetry for subquadratic fractional p-Laplacian equations
    Dong Ye, Weimin Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. Rigidity of volume-minimizing free boundary hypersurfaces in high dimensional Riemannian manifolds
    Sanghun Lee
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Outward minimizing p-capacity, horizons, and Schwarzschild rigidity
    Sehong Park
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. Rigidity and stability for the Bogovskii constant
    Glen Wheeler
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{deng2026ball,
  title = {{Ball Rigidity of Local Minimizing Domains for the Best Fractional Sobolev Constant: The Subquadratic Case}},
  author = {Zikang Deng},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.13215},
  eprint = {2609.13215},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13215},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Ball Rigidity of Local Minimizing Domains for the Best Fractional Sobolev Constant: The Subquadratic Case
AU  - Zikang Deng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.13215
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13215
AB  - After Corollary 1.3 in Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations 60 (2021), Paper 231, Djitte, Fall, and Weth asked whether, when 1<p<2, a volume-constrained local minimizing domain for the best fractional Sobolev constant must still be a ball. This paper solves that problem. Let 0<s<1, 1<p<2, and let Ω⊂ℝ^N be a bounded C^3 domain. If Ω is a local minimizing domain for λ_s,p(Ω)=inf[u]_s^2:u∈ℋ*0^s(Ω), |u|*L^p(Ω)=1 under smooth volume-preserving deformations, then Ω is a ball. The proof first uses the fractional Hadamard formula to reduce shape minimality to the overdetermined boundary condition u/δ^s=C_0. To overcome the moving-plane obstruction caused by the failure of u^p−1 to be Lipschitz at zero, we establish a weighted singular narrow-domain maximum principle whose absorption factor is exactly the sp/N power of the measure of the negative set. The difficulty at a corner is resolved by a finite boundary expansion: setting ρ=sp, the boundary quotient is composed of finitely many constant-coefficient normal powers δ^kρ and a C^1,ε remainder; when kρ=1, the unique resonant correction is δlogδ. This expansion makes all lower-order normal terms on the two sides of an orthogonal corner cancel, thereby yielding the first-order tangential vanishing required by the moving-plane corner lemma. The method does not require the domain to be convex and covers the full range 0<s<1 and 1<p<2.
ER  -