Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiscover Sustainability

Shifting practice from silos of thought to systems thinking through the transdisciplinary sustainability transitions framework

  1. 1Center for Energy, Environment and Economy (CEEE/ECEM), Ozyegin University

Abstract

The urgency of global sustainability challenges demands not only innovative solutions but also a fundamental rethinking of how transitions are designed, governed, and practiced, one that requires systemic thinking, diverse perspectives, and collaboration across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Although sustainability transitions research has grown significantly, organizations still lack practical, process-oriented guidance for navigating complex, multi-actor change. The central challenge is not the absence of strategies, but the absence of intentionally designed processes that enable collective sense-making, experiential learning, and internal capacity building. This paper addresses this gap by introducing and empirically examining the Transdisciplinary Sustainability Transitions Framework (TSTF): a staged approach centered on participant experience that enables organizational sustainability transitions through experiential learning, collective visioning, and transdisciplinary co-creation. The TSTF is grounded in the premise that organizational sustainability transitions begin with people: the cognitive and emotional shifts through which individuals develop shared understanding, collective agency, and the internal orientation required to act on sustainability. The framework positions experiential and iterative learning as the primary driver of transformation, recognizing that without this internal human transformation, even the most well-designed sustainability strategy risks remaining an external document rather than an internalized commitment. The framework is examined through three organizationally anonymized case studies conducted in different sectors. Instead of evaluating predefined sustainability outcomes, the analysis focuses on process dynamics, cognitive and relational shifts, and the emergence of transition capacities. By proposing the TSTF as a transition infrastructure rather than a prescriptive strategy model, the paper offers theoretical, empirical, and practice-oriented insights into how sustainability transitions can be enabled through transdisciplinary collaboration and internal ownership.

Related

  1. Well-being Economy in Practice: A Translation Framework for Local Public Health and Sustainability
    C Winding, R Holm, C Bjørk Petersen +2
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionPMCEurope PMC
  2. Metagovernance as scaffolding: strategies promoting co-created learning and innovation for sustainability transitions
    Alexander L. Q. Chen-Florea, Eva Sørensen, Mohd Sallehuddin Mat Noor +2
    Environmental Innovation and Societal TransitionsPeer-reviewedCC BY5 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
  3. Ensuring sustainability and equity within the global wild meat sector is key to achieving the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework targets
    Daniel J. Ingram, Muriel Figuié, Lauren Coad +3
    People and NaturePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClimate scienceHAL
  4. A conceptual framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of mobility systems
    Nicole van den Boom, Adrian Boos, Charly Beye +1
    Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Ecological responsibility, wellbeing, and transformative reach: a three-dimensional framework for assessing ecovillages as social innovations toward sustainability
    Alexandre Zénon
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{otkun2026shifting,
  title = {{Shifting practice from silos of thought to systems thinking through the transdisciplinary sustainability transitions framework}},
  author = {Gokce Otkun and M. Pinar Menguc},
  journal = {Discover Sustainability},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1007/s43621-026-04132-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04132-6},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Shifting practice from silos of thought to systems thinking through the transdisciplinary sustainability transitions framework
AU  - Gokce Otkun
AU  - M. Pinar Menguc
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Discover Sustainability
DO  - 10.1007/s43621-026-04132-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04132-6
AB  - The urgency of global sustainability challenges demands not only innovative solutions but also a fundamental rethinking of how transitions are designed, governed, and practiced, one that requires systemic thinking, diverse perspectives, and collaboration across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Although sustainability transitions research has grown significantly, organizations still lack practical, process-oriented guidance for navigating complex, multi-actor change. The central challenge is not the absence of strategies, but the absence of intentionally designed processes that enable collective sense-making, experiential learning, and internal capacity building. This paper addresses this gap by introducing and empirically examining the Transdisciplinary Sustainability Transitions Framework (TSTF): a staged approach centered on participant experience that enables organizational sustainability transitions through experiential learning, collective visioning, and transdisciplinary co-creation. The TSTF is grounded in the premise that organizational sustainability transitions begin with people: the cognitive and emotional shifts through which individuals develop shared understanding, collective agency, and the internal orientation required to act on sustainability. The framework positions experiential and iterative learning as the primary driver of transformation, recognizing that without this internal human transformation, even the most well-designed sustainability strategy risks remaining an external document rather than an internalized commitment. The framework is examined through three organizationally anonymized case studies conducted in different sectors. Instead of evaluating predefined sustainability outcomes, the analysis focuses on process dynamics, cognitive and relational shifts, and the emergence of transition capacities. By proposing the TSTF as a transition infrastructure rather than a prescriptive strategy model, the paper offers theoretical, empirical, and practice-oriented insights into how sustainability transitions can be enabled through transdisciplinary collaboration and internal ownership.
SN  - 2662-9984
ER  -