Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCognitive neurodynamics

Tonic neuron position and network topology determine synchronization dynamics

4 affiliations
  1. 1Ciudad de México, 05348 México
  2. 2Ciudad de México, 04510 México
  3. 3Mexico City, 14610 Mexico
  4. 4Tuxtla Gutiérrez, 29050 Chiapas México

Abstract

Understanding how collective neuronal rhythms emerge from the interplay between network structure and single-neuron dynamics remains a fundamental challenge in neurodynamics. In this work, we show that in small heterogeneous networks, the network topology and the position of a single tonic neuron govern synchronization dynamics. We study minimal four-neuron Huber–Braun motifs composed of one tonic neuron and three bursting neurons coupled via electrical synapses. By systematically varying the tonic neuron’s centrality—quantified through degree and a quasi-Laplacian measure—we identify two critical coupling thresholds: the critical coupling for global phase synchronization and the coupling at which the network returns to synchronized periodic bursting. Remarkably, centrality determines the nature of the synchronized attractor: motifs in which the tonic neuron has low centrality synchronize into tonic spiking, whereas highly central tonic neurons drive the network toward synchronized bursting. Moreover, the networks exhibit nontrivial collective behaviors, including large-ISI “stairway-to-heaven” structures, partial firing death characterized by the coexistence of spiking and subthreshold neurons, and remote synchronization in the star configuration with the tonic neuron at the hub. While the present study focuses on the Huber–Braun model in four-neuron motifs, excitability and electrical coupling are features shared by many conductance-based neuronal models. This motivates the hypothesis that analogous structure–dynamics relationships may also arise in other neuronal models and small network motifs, highlighting the potential role of local structural control in shaping collective neural rhythms.

Related

  1. How sparse can a fly-brain model be? Connection strength, wiring placement, network state and task jointly determine function-preserving compression of the Drosophila connectome
    D. An
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Repeated morphine reorganizes sleep-wake states, cortical and central medial thalamic oscillations, and network synchronization in mice
    V. Tadic, M. Walz, S. Todorovic +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Time-averaged and Time-varying Structure of the Gastric Network Revealed Through fMRI-Electrogastrogram Synchronization
    Y. Zair, G. Avidan
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Impact of seed node position on network robustness under localized attacks
    Masaki Chujyo, Shu Liu, Fujio Toriumi
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyPLOS
  5. Network topology reveals distinct forms of developmental leverage in the Drosophila wing
    L. Gardner, D. Adams, K. Z. McKenna
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textDevelopmental biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{megchun2026tonic,
  title = {{Tonic neuron position and network topology determine synchronization dynamics}},
  author = {Agustín Farrera Megchun and Pablo Padilla and Jesús Espinal-Enríquez and Gerardo J. Escalera Santos and Roberto Bernal-Jaquez},
  journal = {Cognitive neurodynamics},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1007/s11571-026-10585-2},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728082},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Tonic neuron position and network topology determine synchronization dynamics
AU  - Agustín Farrera Megchun
AU  - Pablo Padilla
AU  - Jesús Espinal-Enríquez
AU  - Gerardo J. Escalera Santos
AU  - Roberto Bernal-Jaquez
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - Cognitive neurodynamics
DO  - 10.1007/s11571-026-10585-2
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728082
AB  - Understanding how collective neuronal rhythms emerge from the interplay between network structure and single-neuron dynamics remains a fundamental challenge in neurodynamics. In this work, we show that in small heterogeneous networks, the network topology and the position of a single tonic neuron govern synchronization dynamics. We study minimal four-neuron Huber–Braun motifs composed of one tonic neuron and three bursting neurons coupled via electrical synapses. By systematically varying the tonic neuron’s centrality—quantified through degree and a quasi-Laplacian measure—we identify two critical coupling thresholds: the critical coupling for global phase synchronization and the coupling at which the network returns to synchronized periodic bursting. Remarkably, centrality determines the nature of the synchronized attractor: motifs in which the tonic neuron has low centrality synchronize into tonic spiking, whereas highly central tonic neurons drive the network toward synchronized bursting. Moreover, the networks exhibit nontrivial collective behaviors, including large-ISI “stairway-to-heaven” structures, partial firing death characterized by the coexistence of spiking and subthreshold neurons, and remote synchronization in the star configuration with the tonic neuron at the hub. While the present study focuses on the Huber–Braun model in four-neuron motifs, excitability and electrical coupling are features shared by many conductance-based neuronal models. This motivates the hypothesis that analogous structure–dynamics relationships may also arise in other neuronal models and small network motifs, highlighting the potential role of local structural control in shaping collective neural rhythms.
SN  - 1871-4080
SN  - 1871-4099
ER  -