Differences in epifaunal ecological functioning between natural and artificial hard substrates with implications for offshore renewable energy development
Abstract
The expansion of offshore renewable energy developments (ORED) has prompted increasing concerns regarding their potential impacts on the marine environment and repercussions for ecosystem functions. A comparative assessment of benthic invertebrate communities associated with natural versus artificial hard substrates could provide insights for assessing ecological changes following the installation of such structures. This study evaluated the ecological functionality of offshore wind turbine foundations, scour protection layers, and geogenic natural reefs through a trait-based approach. The analysis focused on two regions (which we called ‘Belgium’ and ‘Borkum’) selected based on the availability of high-resolution invertebrate taxonomic data, comprising natural and artificial substrates at nearby geographical locations. Taxonomic data were sourced from the BISAR database, while functional trait data were compiled through an extensive review of the scientific literature. A total of six functional traits, encompassing 29 modalities, were assessed. The resulting data were analysed to determine both taxonomic and functional differences between artificial and natural hard substrates. Functional analyses were performed using a combination of functional diversity indices and latent variable models to elucidate underlying patterns in trait distribution and community functioning. The results constitute evidence, demonstrating that geogenic natural habitats support higher levels of biodiversity and harbour functionally distinct communities when compared to artificial structures. Analyses of functional diversity indices revealed significant differences in functional evenness and divergence between natural reef communities and those associated with artificial structures. These differences illustrate that natural rocks exhibit greater functional resilience to environmental disturbances. Furthermore, the majority of trait modalities exhibited significant responses to at least one substrate type, and several taxa displayed effect sizes that were positively or negatively correlated with specific habitat types, indicating substrate-driven shifts in community functional composition. Given the pronounced differences in biodiversity and functional attributes between natural and artificial hard substrates, enhancing the ecological sustainability of ORED requires a shift towards ecologically informed design. Artificial structures could potentially be engineered to mimic the multidimensional and heterogeneous properties of natural substrates, facilitating the establishment of more resilient benthic communities. These results have conservation and management implications when planning the introduction of such structures over local and regional scales.
Related
- A process-based framework for diagnosing floodplain ecological functioning to guide riverine wetland restoration
- Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Ecological Implications of Microplastic Contamination in Benthic Fish from the Tongkou River, China.
- Microplastics–Pollutant Interactions in Environmental Systems: Mechanisms, Ecological Effects, and Implications for Sustainable Management
- Reframing Mangroves as Socio-Ecological Coastal Infrastructure: Development and Application of a Six-Pillar Socio-Ecological Infrastructure Framework
- Management implications from multi-scale linkages between landscape ecological risk and habitat quality in the Qinghai Lake Basin
BibTeX
@article{mavraki2026differences,
title = {{Differences in epifaunal ecological functioning between natural and artificial hard substrates with implications for offshore renewable energy development}},
author = {Ninon Mavraki and Andrew Want and Stefan G Bolam and Tan Tjui Yeuw and Silvana Birchenough and Kevin Boutin and Caterina Coral and Jennifer Dannheim and Nicolas Desroy and Urszula Janas and Danae-Athena Kapasakali and Leandra M Kornau and Jan Vanaverbeke and Pedro Almeida Vinagre and Joop W P Coolen},
journal = {ICES Journal of Marine Science},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1093/icesjms/fsag074},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05854014v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Differences in epifaunal ecological functioning between natural and artificial hard substrates with implications for offshore renewable energy development
AU - Ninon Mavraki
AU - Andrew Want
AU - Stefan G Bolam
AU - Tan Tjui Yeuw
AU - Silvana Birchenough
AU - Kevin Boutin
AU - Caterina Coral
AU - Jennifer Dannheim
AU - Nicolas Desroy
AU - Urszula Janas
AU - Danae-Athena Kapasakali
AU - Leandra M Kornau
AU - Jan Vanaverbeke
AU - Pedro Almeida Vinagre
AU - Joop W P Coolen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/05
JO - ICES Journal of Marine Science
DO - 10.1093/icesjms/fsag074
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05854014v1
AB - The expansion of offshore renewable energy developments (ORED) has prompted increasing concerns regarding their potential impacts on the marine environment and repercussions for ecosystem functions. A comparative assessment of benthic invertebrate communities associated with natural versus artificial hard substrates could provide insights for assessing ecological changes following the installation of such structures. This study evaluated the ecological functionality of offshore wind turbine foundations, scour protection layers, and geogenic natural reefs through a trait-based approach. The analysis focused on two regions (which we called ‘Belgium’ and ‘Borkum’) selected based on the availability of high-resolution invertebrate taxonomic data, comprising natural and artificial substrates at nearby geographical locations. Taxonomic data were sourced from the BISAR database, while functional trait data were compiled through an extensive review of the scientific literature. A total of six functional traits, encompassing 29 modalities, were assessed. The resulting data were analysed to determine both taxonomic and functional differences between artificial and natural hard substrates. Functional analyses were performed using a combination of functional diversity indices and latent variable models to elucidate underlying patterns in trait distribution and community functioning. The results constitute evidence, demonstrating that geogenic natural habitats support higher levels of biodiversity and harbour functionally distinct communities when compared to artificial structures. Analyses of functional diversity indices revealed significant differences in functional evenness and divergence between natural reef communities and those associated with artificial structures. These differences illustrate that natural rocks exhibit greater functional resilience to environmental disturbances. Furthermore, the majority of trait modalities exhibited significant responses to at least one substrate type, and several taxa displayed effect sizes that were positively or negatively correlated with specific habitat types, indicating substrate-driven shifts in community functional composition. Given the pronounced differences in biodiversity and functional attributes between natural and artificial hard substrates, enhancing the ecological sustainability of ORED requires a shift towards ecologically informed design. Artificial structures could potentially be engineered to mimic the multidimensional and heterogeneous properties of natural substrates, facilitating the establishment of more resilient benthic communities. These results have conservation and management implications when planning the introduction of such structures over local and regional scales.
SN - 1054-3139
SN - 1095-9289
ER -