Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

A baseline review of the current use of armed escorts for humanitarian convoys in complex emergencies

Abstract

As the number and intensity of protracted state-based conflicts continues to rise globally, humanitarian organizations face a complex range of personnel security dilemmas. Some have responded by utilizing armed escorts (AE) for their humanitarian convoys in emergency settings, but others raise concerns about the impact of this practice on the humanitarian principles of neutrality and independence. This research utilizes a mixed method approach that combines quantitative survey data and qualitative analysis of key informant interviews from UN and NGO personnel in 32 countries alongside data collected by an artificial intelligence guided search of online grey literature sources to estimate and analyze the use of AE in humanitarian emergencies globally. Data analysis revealed that AE are used in 61–71% of humanitarian contexts globally, though the frequency of AE use varies significantly by context. UN actors use AE at higher rates than NGO actors, but informants perceive that when UN organizations start using AE in operational settings, other humanitarian responders feel pressured to do the same. Despite humanitarian respondents raising concerns about ethics and effectiveness, organizations continue to use AE to mitigate security risks and lack proper exit strategies. Furthermore, this article underscores the breakdown of community acceptance as a humanitarian security strategy and outlines the implications for the future of UN and NGO engagement in humanitarian operations globally.

Related

  1. Operationalising the Operational Guidance on Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies: A Narrative Review of Implementation Strategies, Barriers, Facilitators, and Health System Integration in Humanitarian Settings
    Mabitsela Hezekiel Mphasha, Elisa Sebina Mphasha, Rajesh Vagiri
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  2. Current status and capabilities of cancer prevention and treatment in county-level hospitals in Fujian Province: a baseline survey under the hierarchical medical system
    Chen Guo, Qingmei Feng, Zuotian Yu +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  3. Beyond global AMR targets: toward equitable and actionable implementation targets in humanitarian settings
    Carine Naim, Krystel Moussally, Mohamad Khalife +6
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
  4. Keeping care alive in 2025-26 humanitarian Somalia: routine digital data and frontline and managerial perspectives on integrated services
    L. Clech, M. A. Maalim, R. O. Nyanga +4
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. The governance gap: Determinants of health, international humanitarian law violations, and the case for health diplomacy
    Ellen Beer, José Chen-Xu, Regina Yuen +9
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
BibTeX
@article{levine2026baseline,
  title = {{A baseline review of the current use of armed escorts for humanitarian convoys in complex emergencies}},
  author = {Adam C. Levine and Elena Bernardi and Christopher Russell and Christina Charie and David Polatty},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919885},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919885},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A baseline review of the current use of armed escorts for humanitarian convoys in complex emergencies
AU  - Adam C. Levine
AU  - Elena Bernardi
AU  - Christopher Russell
AU  - Christina Charie
AU  - David Polatty
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919885
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919885
AB  - As the number and intensity of protracted state-based conflicts continues to rise globally, humanitarian organizations face a complex range of personnel security dilemmas. Some have responded by utilizing armed escorts (AE) for their humanitarian convoys in emergency settings, but others raise concerns about the impact of this practice on the humanitarian principles of neutrality and independence. This research utilizes a mixed method approach that combines quantitative survey data and qualitative analysis of key informant interviews from UN and NGO personnel in 32 countries alongside data collected by an artificial intelligence guided search of online grey literature sources to estimate and analyze the use of AE in humanitarian emergencies globally. Data analysis revealed that AE are used in 61–71% of humanitarian contexts globally, though the frequency of AE use varies significantly by context. UN actors use AE at higher rates than NGO actors, but informants perceive that when UN organizations start using AE in operational settings, other humanitarian responders feel pressured to do the same. Despite humanitarian respondents raising concerns about ethics and effectiveness, organizations continue to use AE to mitigate security risks and lack proper exit strategies. Furthermore, this article underscores the breakdown of community acceptance as a humanitarian security strategy and outlines the implications for the future of UN and NGO engagement in humanitarian operations globally.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -