Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

An Empirically Calibrated [C II] Luminosity-Halo Mass Relation for Line Intensity Mapping

Abstract

Millimeter-wave line intensity mapping aims to observe the high-redshift universe through the 158 μm fine-structure line of [C II], the brightest far-infrared line of star-forming galaxies. Whether a [C II] experiment at z>4 measures the clustering of large-scale structure, which carries rich cosmological information, rather than the shot noise of the emitters depends on the amplitude and the shape of the [C II] power spectrum. Forecasts often build the power spectrum from a halo mass--luminosity relation, L(Mh), chained from scaling relations measured in other regimes or read off simulations, without a quantified uncertainty. We instead calibrate a double power-law L(Mh,z) on [C II] data alone: the mean [C II] intensity from tomographic cross-correlation at 0.4<z<4.2 and the luminosity-function measurements and limits at z≃0 and 4.3≲ z≲8. The four parameters of the double power law are fitted at z=4.5 and $5.5$ separately, with no assumption about their evolution, and then jointly across 0<z<7, and we examine how the uncertainty depends on the modeling assumptions. The shape of the power spectrum is settled by the existing data. The clustering peak stands a factor of 45 (23-93) and 64 (38-112) above the shot-noise floor at z=4.5 and $5.5$, and the two cross at kc≃0.37 and 0.44 hMpc−1. The amplitude is known less well, the clustering power to 0.5−0.6 dex and the shot noise to 0.7−0.9 dex. The results show that the signal comes from halos accessible by current galaxy surveys, those that host the Lyman-break galaxies and Lyα emitters at these redshifts. The luminosity-weighted bias is relatively high, with values of 4−5.

Related

  1. Detecting atmospheres in the presence of stellar contamination: an empirically calibrated framework applied to four JWST/NIRSpec PRISM transits of TRAPPIST-1c
    Alexander D. Rathcke, Lars A. Buchhave
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textInstrumentation & methodsPlanetary science & exoplanetsarXiv
  2. Axions and the RR Lyrae Period-Luminosity Relation
    Jeremy Sakstein, Djuna Croon
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  3. The Broad-Line Region Size-Luminosity Relation in AGN Constrained by the Viewing Angle with the FRADO Model
    Junhee Myong, Jong-Hak Woo, Mohammad-Hassan Naddaf +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  4. The origin of dispersion in the wind mass-loss rate--luminosity relation of massive O stars
    Jiri Krticka, Iva Krtickova
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
  5. The origin of dispersion in the wind mass-loss rate–luminosity relation of massive O stars
    J. Krtička, I. Krtičková
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Solar & stellar physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{jeong2026empirically,
  title = {{An Empirically Calibrated [C II] Luminosity-Halo Mass Relation for Line Intensity Mapping}},
  author = {Oliver Jeong and Martin White},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.40550},
  eprint = {2610.40550},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40550},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - An Empirically Calibrated [C II] Luminosity-Halo Mass Relation for Line Intensity Mapping
AU  - Oliver Jeong
AU  - Martin White
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.40550
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40550
AB  - Millimeter-wave line intensity mapping aims to observe the high-redshift universe through the 158 μm fine-structure line of [C II], the brightest far-infrared line of star-forming galaxies. Whether a [C II] experiment at z>4 measures the clustering of large-scale structure, which carries rich cosmological information, rather than the shot noise of the emitters depends on the amplitude and the shape of the [C II] power spectrum. Forecasts often build the power spectrum from a halo mass--luminosity relation, L(M_h), chained from scaling relations measured in other regimes or read off simulations, without a quantified uncertainty. We instead calibrate a double power-law L(M_h,z) on [C II] data alone: the mean [C II] intensity from tomographic cross-correlation at 0.4<z<4.2 and the luminosity-function measurements and limits at z≃0 and 4.3≲ z≲8. The four parameters of the double power law are fitted at z=4.5 and $5.5$ separately, with no assumption about their evolution, and then jointly across 0<z<7, and we examine how the uncertainty depends on the modeling assumptions. The shape of the power spectrum is settled by the existing data. The clustering peak stands a factor of 45 (23-93) and 64 (38-112) above the shot-noise floor at z=4.5 and $5.5$, and the two cross at k_c≃0.37 and 0.44 hMpc^−1. The amplitude is known less well, the clustering power to 0.5−0.6 dex and the shot noise to 0.7−0.9 dex. The results show that the signal comes from halos accessible by current galaxy surveys, those that host the Lyman-break galaxies and Lyα emitters at these redshifts. The luminosity-weighted bias is relatively high, with values of 4−5.
ER  -