Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

Comparing magic state cultivation methods using matrix product states

Abstract

Magic state cultivation prepares high-fidelity magic states at low expected space-time costs; however, the exact performance of some schemes is unsettled due to the difficulty in simulating non-Clifford circuits. Here, we use matrix-product states (MPS) based methods to compute the exact performance of two types of fold-transversal cultivation schemes: (i) the Sahay et al method based on the regular surface code S gate, and (ii) a method we propose based on a partially fault-tolerant fold-transversal S gate. We show that for the former protocol at d=5, the |T⟩ output reaches similar logical error rates to the |S⟩ output, traditionally used as a cheap full Clifford proxy. This contrasts with the ∼10× discrepancy reported for the d=5 colour-code scheme of Gidney et al. We also find that our new d=5 scheme has ∼1.3× lower expected space-time cost while still reaching 10−9 logical error rate. We show that MPS and Clifford-augmented MPS (CAMPS) perform on par with or even better than the recently introduced near-Clifford simulator Clifft on the hardest d=5 regular surface code scheme. Additionally, to speed up simulation, we propose a new pre-screening method based on simple Pauli propagation, lowering by up to three orders of magnitude the required number of exact simulations, and use several simulator-agnostic sampling methods such as subset sampling.

Related

  1. Efficient time-dependent dynamics of matrix product states using average Hamiltonians
    Belal Abouraya, Jirawat Saiphet, Fedor Jelezko +1
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Atomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  2. Probing the Error-Mitigation Threshold with Matrix Product States
    Jia-Yao Zhao, Zhi-Yuan Wei, Michael J. Gullans
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Random Gaussian Augmented Matrix Product States
    Stavya Puri, Poetri Sonya Tarabunga, Piotr Sierant
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. The Quasiparticle Ansatz for Relativistic Continuous Matrix Product States
    Silviu S. Pufu, Benjamin T. Søgaard, Spyros Terlemes
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. Symmetry defects and gauging for quantum states with matrix product unitary symmetries
    Adrián Franco-Rubio, Arkadiusz Bochniak, J. Ignacio Cirac
    QuantumPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text2 citedAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{hartweg2026comparing,
  title = {{Comparing magic state cultivation methods using matrix product states}},
  author = {Tom Hartweg and Asier Piñeiro Orioli},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.19116},
  eprint = {2609.19116},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19116},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Comparing magic state cultivation methods using matrix product states
AU  - Tom Hartweg
AU  - Asier Piñeiro Orioli
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.19116
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19116
AB  - Magic state cultivation prepares high-fidelity magic states at low expected space-time costs; however, the exact performance of some schemes is unsettled due to the difficulty in simulating non-Clifford circuits. Here, we use matrix-product states (MPS) based methods to compute the exact performance of two types of fold-transversal cultivation schemes: (i) the Sahay et al method based on the regular surface code S gate, and (ii) a method we propose based on a partially fault-tolerant fold-transversal S gate. We show that for the former protocol at d=5, the |T⟩ output reaches similar logical error rates to the |S⟩ output, traditionally used as a cheap full Clifford proxy. This contrasts with the ∼10× discrepancy reported for the d=5 colour-code scheme of Gidney et al. We also find that our new d=5 scheme has ∼1.3× lower expected space-time cost while still reaching 10^−9 logical error rate. We show that MPS and Clifford-augmented MPS (CAMPS) perform on par with or even better than the recently introduced near-Clifford simulator Clifft on the hardest d=5 regular surface code scheme. Additionally, to speed up simulation, we propose a new pre-screening method based on simple Pauli propagation, lowering by up to three orders of magnitude the required number of exact simulations, and use several simulator-agnostic sampling methods such as subset sampling.
ER  -