Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Uncertainty Quantification of Next Generation Reservoir Computing with Applications to Memory-Driven Dynamical Systems

Abstract

Nonlinear dynamical systems with memory arise across science and engineering, yet uncertainty quantification for efficient forecasting methods such as Next Generation Reservoir Computing (NGRC) remains underdeveloped. We study Bayesian ridge and conformal prediction intervals for NGRC and characterize when their uncertainty estimates agree or differ. In low dimensions, their asymptotic widths are governed by different summaries of the residual distribution, so agreement depends on residual shape rather than dimensionality alone. In high dimensions, regularization introduces a further tradeoff between estimation variance, shrinkage bias, and posterior uncertainty, leading to an explicit transition between regimes where Bayesian intervals are wider or narrower than conformal intervals. We extend these results to quadratic NGRC feature maps and give sufficient conditions for transferring the analysis to temporally dependent forecast windows. Simulations and real-data experiments support the theoretical predictions and illustrate how residual distribution, regularization, dimensionality, and distribution shift affect interval calibration and efficiency. These results provide a principled framework for choosing and interpreting uncertainty quantification methods in reservoir-based forecasting.

Related

  1. Multi-Task Learning of Conditional Mean Operators: applications to dynamical systems and uncertainty quantification
    Sami Chemlal, Thibaut Germain, Rémi Flamary +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Asymptotic-Preserving Tensor Neural Networks for 3D High-Field Kinetic Equations with Applications to Uncertainty Quantification
    Shi Jin, Tian-ai Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  3. The internal model principle in reservoir computing
    Danyal Saqib, Alberto Padoan
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. A hidden bottleneck in classical and quantum linear reservoir computing
    Johannes Nokkala, Federico Centrone, Francesco Arzani
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsQuantum physics & quantum informationHAL
  5. LoRA-RC: Reservoir Computing with Low-Rank Adaptation
    Wenbin Wan
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textDynamical systemsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{popa2026uncertainty,
  title = {{Uncertainty Quantification of Next Generation Reservoir Computing with Applications to Memory-Driven Dynamical Systems}},
  author = {Livia Popa and Sumanta Basu and Martin T. Wells},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.32169},
  eprint = {2609.32169},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32169},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Uncertainty Quantification of Next Generation Reservoir Computing with Applications to Memory-Driven Dynamical Systems
AU  - Livia Popa
AU  - Sumanta Basu
AU  - Martin T. Wells
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.32169
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32169
AB  - Nonlinear dynamical systems with memory arise across science and engineering, yet uncertainty quantification for efficient forecasting methods such as Next Generation Reservoir Computing (NGRC) remains underdeveloped. We study Bayesian ridge and conformal prediction intervals for NGRC and characterize when their uncertainty estimates agree or differ. In low dimensions, their asymptotic widths are governed by different summaries of the residual distribution, so agreement depends on residual shape rather than dimensionality alone. In high dimensions, regularization introduces a further tradeoff between estimation variance, shrinkage bias, and posterior uncertainty, leading to an explicit transition between regimes where Bayesian intervals are wider or narrower than conformal intervals. We extend these results to quadratic NGRC feature maps and give sufficient conditions for transferring the analysis to temporally dependent forecast windows. Simulations and real-data experiments support the theoretical predictions and illustrate how residual distribution, regularization, dimensionality, and distribution shift affect interval calibration and efficiency. These results provide a principled framework for choosing and interpreting uncertainty quantification methods in reservoir-based forecasting.
ER  -