Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Parameter-Efficient Multilinear Readout for Quantum Reservoir Computing

Abstract

Quantum Reservoir Computing (QRC) uses fixed quantum dynamics as a high-dimensional feature map. Still, standard pipelines flatten reservoir measurements and train a linear readout, ignoring the natural tensor structure across time steps, qubits, and observables. We propose a multilinear readout for quantum reservoir computing (ML-QRC), a tensor-structured neural readout compressed through mode-wise projections. Relative to a dense hidden-width-64 neural readout, this reduces the feature-to-hidden parameter count from 64TnF to d(T+n+F)+64d3, giving a 12.1× feature-block compression at T=50, n=6, d=8, and F=n+binomn2. Across Mackey-Glass forecasting and TFIM phase classification, ML-QRC remains statistically competitive with Ridge on Mackey-Glass and obtains the numerically highest full-data TFIM accuracy among tested methods, while using 12.0× fewer parameters than the full dense MLP. Its clearest benefit is improved low-data stability relative to neural MLP readouts on Mackey-Glass; this advantage does not transfer to TFIM, where Ridge performs best at 50\% data. Overall, ML-QRC is best viewed as a tensor-structured neural readout that compresses dense MLP readouts while preserving QRC tensor structure, rather than as a replacement for simple linear/Ridge readouts in the tested regime.

Related

  1. Photonic reservoir computing with dimensionally compressed readout
    Gerald Kobi, Mohab Abdalla, Miguel C. Soriano +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptics & photonicsarXiv
  2. Parameter-efficient neural computing with programmable photonic meshes
    Artem Popov, Stanislav Straupe, Mikhail Saygin
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptics & photonicsarXiv
  3. Reservoir computing generalized: Exploiting complex dynamics via time-invariant transformation
    Tomoyuki Kubota, Sumito Tsunegi, Kohei Nakajima
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedPublisher termsAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  4. Nonlinear pluggable optics: Digital signal processing-free Intensity Modulated Direct Detection links using analog photonic Next Generation Reservoir Computing
    Nicholas Cox, Joseph Murray, Ross Schermer +6
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedLicence not statedOptics & photonicsCrossref
  5. Basin Geometry and Reliable Recall of Dynamical Memories in Reservoir Computing
    Ling-Wei Kong, Ying-Cheng Lai
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{nguyen2026parameterefficient,
  title = {{Parameter-Efficient Multilinear Readout for Quantum Reservoir Computing}},
  author = {Van Tien Nguyen and Panagiotis Markopoulos},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.13974},
  eprint = {2610.13974},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13974},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Parameter-Efficient Multilinear Readout for Quantum Reservoir Computing
AU  - Van Tien Nguyen
AU  - Panagiotis Markopoulos
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.13974
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13974
AB  - Quantum Reservoir Computing (QRC) uses fixed quantum dynamics as a high-dimensional feature map. Still, standard pipelines flatten reservoir measurements and train a linear readout, ignoring the natural tensor structure across time steps, qubits, and observables. We propose a multilinear readout for quantum reservoir computing (ML-QRC), a tensor-structured neural readout compressed through mode-wise projections. Relative to a dense hidden-width-64 neural readout, this reduces the feature-to-hidden parameter count from 64TnF to d(T+n+F)+64d^3, giving a 12.1× feature-block compression at T=50, n=6, d=8, and F=n+binomn2. Across Mackey-Glass forecasting and TFIM phase classification, ML-QRC remains statistically competitive with Ridge on Mackey-Glass and obtains the numerically highest full-data TFIM accuracy among tested methods, while using 12.0× fewer parameters than the full dense MLP. Its clearest benefit is improved low-data stability relative to neural MLP readouts on Mackey-Glass; this advantage does not transfer to TFIM, where Ridge performs best at 50\% data. Overall, ML-QRC is best viewed as a tensor-structured neural readout that compresses dense MLP readouts while preserving QRC tensor structure, rather than as a replacement for simple linear/Ridge readouts in the tested regime.
ER  -