Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Biogeosciences

Quantifying aggregation bias in marsh carbon flux estimates caused by rhizosphere oxygen heterogeneity

  1. 1Universität Hamburg (Hamburg, Germany)
  2. 2Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon (Geesthacht, Germany)

Abstract

Oxygen (O ₂ ) in marsh rhizospheres varies strongly at millimetre scales due to radial oxygen loss (ROL), re-oxidation of reduced compounds, hydrology, and sediment structure. Yet many models estimate heterotrophic (microbial) respiration at a single mean O ₂ , which can bias CO ₂ fluxes because the O ₂ response of respiration is curved (nonlinear). We calibrated an enzyme kinetic respiration function to marsh-soil incubations, then compared (I) respiration evaluated at a single mean O ₂ value with (II) the mean of different respiration fluxes over a prescribed rhizosphere O ₂ distribution. To isolate oxygen effects, temperature and the relation between substrate and soil moisture were held fixed; incubations were used only to calibrate carbon kinetics. For a gas-phase, air-equivalent O ₂ proxy, the single mean approach overestimates respiration by ∼ 12 % on average. This bias increases with increasing variation of O ₂ and with the ratio of mean O ₂ to the O ₂ half-saturation constant KM,O2. In the dissolved phase, mean O ₂ ≪ KM,O2 and variation in O ₂ is small, so the bias is negligible due to linear behaviour of the relation in these conditions; when physiology is unit-matched to a similar relative saturation, however, the dissolved case shows a negative bias comparable to the gas-phase one. Our findings suggest reporting the mean and variation of O ₂ together with a calibrated KM,O2 allows modellers to anticipate or correct the bias associated with replacing heterogeneous rhizosphere conditions with a single mean.

Versions

Related

  1. Quantifying nonlinear thresholds of grey-green space morphology on urban carbon metabolism across local climate zones: a machine learning study in Changchun city
    Yuqing Gong, Wenjun Qin
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  2. A method quantifying soil melanin to understand fungal impacts on soil carbon stability
    Sylwia Adamczyk, Bartosz Adamczyk
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossref
  3. Updated global estimates of carbon burial in seagrass sediments
    Songlin Liu, Hongxue Luo, Sai Gao
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Oceanography & cryosphereCrossref
  4. Quantifying the impact of groundwater fauna and temperature on the ecosystem service of microbial carbon degradation; a proof-of-principle approach
    Susanne I. Schmidt, Nora Rütz, Jürgen Marxsen
    BiogeosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Geology & geochemistryCrossref
  5. Data-based estimates of ocean carbon uptake biased high from neglect of submonthly atmospheric pressure variability
    Jeanne Dombret, Hugo Bellenger, Xavier Perrot +8
    BiogeosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClimate scienceOceanography & cryosphereHAL
BibTeX
@article{saadaoui2026quantifying,
  title = {{Quantifying aggregation bias in marsh carbon flux estimates caused by rhizosphere oxygen heterogeneity}},
  author = {Youssef Saadaoui and Christian Beer and Peter Mueller and Friederike Neiske and Joscha N. Becker and Annette Eschenbach and Philipp Porada},
  journal = {Biogeosciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5194/bg-23-6803-2026},
  url = {https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/6803/2026/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Quantifying aggregation bias in marsh carbon flux estimates caused by rhizosphere oxygen heterogeneity
AU  - Youssef Saadaoui
AU  - Christian Beer
AU  - Peter Mueller
AU  - Friederike Neiske
AU  - Joscha N. Becker
AU  - Annette Eschenbach
AU  - Philipp Porada
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - Biogeosciences
DO  - 10.5194/bg-23-6803-2026
UR  - https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/6803/2026/
AB  - Oxygen (O ₂ ) in marsh rhizospheres varies strongly at millimetre scales due to radial oxygen loss (ROL), re-oxidation of reduced compounds, hydrology, and sediment structure. Yet many models estimate heterotrophic (microbial) respiration at a single mean O ₂ , which can bias CO ₂ fluxes because the O ₂ response of respiration is curved (nonlinear). We calibrated an enzyme kinetic respiration function to marsh-soil incubations, then compared (I) respiration evaluated at a single mean O ₂ value with (II) the mean of different respiration fluxes over a prescribed rhizosphere O ₂ distribution. To isolate oxygen effects, temperature and the relation between substrate and soil moisture were held fixed; incubations were used only to calibrate carbon kinetics. For a gas-phase, air-equivalent O ₂ proxy, the single mean approach overestimates respiration by ∼ 12 % on average. This bias increases with increasing variation of O ₂ and with the ratio of mean O ₂ to the O ₂ half-saturation constant KM,O2. In the dissolved phase, mean O ₂ ≪ KM,O2 and variation in O ₂ is small, so the bias is negligible due to linear behaviour of the relation in these conditions; when physiology is unit-matched to a similar relative saturation, however, the dissolved case shows a negative bias comparable to the gas-phase one. Our findings suggest reporting the mean and variation of O ₂ together with a calibrated KM,O2 allows modellers to anticipate or correct the bias associated with replacing heterogeneous rhizosphere conditions with a single mean.
SN  - 1726-4189
ER  -