Patient experience using an electronic patient portal in a tertiary care setting: A cross-sectional study
- 1Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- 2Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Arthur J.E. Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada; Corresponding author at: Radiation Oncologist, Arthur J.E. Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Clinical Professor, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, 3395 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 5G2, Canada.
Abstract
Purpose: Electronic patient portals provide a unique opportunity for people with cancer to access their health information and engage in their care. In 2022, our health system launched a patient portal. The purpose of this study was to investigate how a patient portal influences communication and patient experience in the radiation department of a tertiary cancer center. The objectives were (1) to describe the uptake of the portal and factors associated with portal use; (2) to evaluate the association between portal use and experience of communicating with the clinic; (3) to describe how the experience of communication with the clinic changed over time when compared to historical data. Methods: This cross-sectional study collected patient experience data using the validated Your Voice Matters (YVM) survey in the radiotherapy department of a tertiary care centre. Recruitment of people with a cancer diagnosis undergoing radiation therapy occurred between April and October 2024. A logistic regression was used to evaluate demographic factors associated with portal use. A second model was constructed to evaluate portal use with patient reported experience. Experience with communication in this cohort was compared to prior years' YVM data. Results: Overall, 400 people completed the survey and of those 265 (66%) were portal users. Portal users were younger and had higher education. Portal users reported more positive experiences (90%) for how the clinic responded when compared to non-users (73%) ( p = 0.005). Patients with breast cancer reported more positive experiences compared to the other tumor groups. Since the launch of the patient portal in 2022, patient experience has improved significantly in areas such as contacting the clinic (from 30% to 84%) and how the clinic responded (from 48% to 80%) (both, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights that certain patient subgroups are more likely to use the portal and that those who use the portal are more likely to have better experiences communicating with the clinic.
Related
- Perceived Electronic Health Record System Success and Its Associations With Healthcare Quality, Patient Safety, and Operational Efficiency in a Saudi Tertiary Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study
- Assessing Patient Safety Culture Among Doctors, Nurses, and Allied Health Professionals Using the Indian Version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (I-HSOPSC 2.0): A Cross-Sectional Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in India
- Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Attending a Tertiary Pulmonary Clinic in Damascus, Syria: A Cross-Sectional Study of Spirometric and Patient-Reported Correlates
- MRI-related anxiety and patient-facing digital tools among adults with prior MRI experience: A cross-sectional study
- Patient Satisfaction With a One-Stop Service Center in a Tertiary Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study.
BibTeX
@article{bailey2026patient,
title = {{Patient experience using an electronic patient portal in a tertiary care setting: A cross-sectional study}},
author = {Grace E. Bailey and Demetra Yannitsos and Lisa Barbera},
journal = {Technical Innovations \& Patient Support in Radiation Oncology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.tipsro.2026.100444},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2026.100444},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Patient experience using an electronic patient portal in a tertiary care setting: A cross-sectional study
AU - Grace E. Bailey
AU - Demetra Yannitsos
AU - Lisa Barbera
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
DO - 10.1016/j.tipsro.2026.100444
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2026.100444
AB - Purpose: Electronic patient portals provide a unique opportunity for people with cancer to access their health information and engage in their care. In 2022, our health system launched a patient portal. The purpose of this study was to investigate how a patient portal influences communication and patient experience in the radiation department of a tertiary cancer center. The objectives were (1) to describe the uptake of the portal and factors associated with portal use; (2) to evaluate the association between portal use and experience of communicating with the clinic; (3) to describe how the experience of communication with the clinic changed over time when compared to historical data. Methods: This cross-sectional study collected patient experience data using the validated Your Voice Matters (YVM) survey in the radiotherapy department of a tertiary care centre. Recruitment of people with a cancer diagnosis undergoing radiation therapy occurred between April and October 2024. A logistic regression was used to evaluate demographic factors associated with portal use. A second model was constructed to evaluate portal use with patient reported experience. Experience with communication in this cohort was compared to prior years' YVM data. Results: Overall, 400 people completed the survey and of those 265 (66%) were portal users. Portal users were younger and had higher education. Portal users reported more positive experiences (90%) for how the clinic responded when compared to non-users (73%) ( p = 0.005). Patients with breast cancer reported more positive experiences compared to the other tumor groups. Since the launch of the patient portal in 2022, patient experience has improved significantly in areas such as contacting the clinic (from 30% to 84%) and how the clinic responded (from 48% to 80%) (both, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights that certain patient subgroups are more likely to use the portal and that those who use the portal are more likely to have better experiences communicating with the clinic.
SN - 2405-6324
ER -