Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Wild chimpanzee groups increase social connectivity prior to risky collective action

  1. 1Kyoto University

Abstract

Cooperation is foundational to complex sociality, yet presents profound evolutionary dilemmas - costs and benefits are rarely distributed evenly and the decision to collaborate or defect can involve a complex contextual calculus. These challenges are compounded when cooperation scales from pairs to groups. Group-level cooperation is fundamental to many species success, but how is it sustained and regulated in nature? One promising route to addressing this question is to examine how individuals reorganise their affiliative interactions in anticipation of group-level cooperation. We examine such pre-cooperative reorganisation using long-term data (2013-2018) from three neighbouring groups of wild chimpanzees at the Tai National Park, Cote dIvoire, who routinely cooperate as a collective to defend their territory against other groups. We found that chimpanzees adjusted the distribution of their social contacts in anticipation of risky and proactive territorial defence by forming more broadly connected, yet more diffuse, affiliative networks. Specifically, adult chimpanzees groomed and played with more group members on days of proactive territorial defence, and this pattern was temporally-sensitive, with increased affiliation occurring before, rather than after, the cooperative act. Chimpanzees accessed a broader range of partners through increased interaction efficiency by switching between more partners with shorter interactions per partner. This pattern suggests a shared evolutionary basis of dynamic social readjustment in preparation for group-level social dilemmas in hominids, potentially providing the foundation for the formalized systems of affiliation found in human societies.

Related

  1. Asymmetric Costs of Coordination Errors Generate Selection on Social and Sensorimotor Phenotypes in an Animal Collective
    L. C. Larter, M. J. Ryan, M. J. Fuxjager
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  2. Wildfires drive trade-offs in ammonia-oxidizing groups and promote denitrification to increase soil emissions of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N2O) in California chaparral
    E. Z. Stephens, A. H. Krichels, A. C. Greene +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
  3. Social attraction mediates collective foraging decisions in invasive yellow-legged hornets
    Mathilde Lacombrade, Charlotte Doussot, Blandine Mahot-Castaing +7
    Behavioral EcologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyZoology & animal behaviourHALEurope PMCPMC
  4. Neural networks reveal emergent properties of collective learning in democratic but not despotic groups
    Joe Morford, Patrick Lewin, Dora Biro +3
    Animal BehaviourPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text6 citedEcologyNeuroscienceHAL
  5. Sublethal costs of infection reduce performance of collective tasks in social insects: a modelling study.
    Supraja Rajagopal, Takao Sasaki, Richard J Hall
    Npj entomologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{brooks2026wild,
  title = {{Wild chimpanzee groups increase social connectivity prior to risky collective action}},
  author = {J. Brooks and R. Mundry and C. Crockford and R. M. Wittig and E. G. Wessling and L. Samuni},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.06.15.732266},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.15.732266v2},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Wild chimpanzee groups increase social connectivity prior to risky collective action
AU  - J. Brooks
AU  - R. Mundry
AU  - C. Crockford
AU  - R. M. Wittig
AU  - E. G. Wessling
AU  - L. Samuni
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/15
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.06.15.732266
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.15.732266v2
AB  - Cooperation is foundational to complex sociality, yet presents profound evolutionary dilemmas - costs and benefits are rarely distributed evenly and the decision to collaborate or defect can involve a complex contextual calculus. These challenges are compounded when cooperation scales from pairs to groups. Group-level cooperation is fundamental to many species success, but how is it sustained and regulated in nature? One promising route to addressing this question is to examine how individuals reorganise their affiliative interactions in anticipation of group-level cooperation. We examine such pre-cooperative reorganisation using long-term data (2013-2018) from three neighbouring groups of wild chimpanzees at the Tai National Park, Cote dIvoire, who routinely cooperate as a collective to defend their territory against other groups. We found that chimpanzees adjusted the distribution of their social contacts in anticipation of risky and proactive territorial defence by forming more broadly connected, yet more diffuse, affiliative networks. Specifically, adult chimpanzees groomed and played with more group members on days of proactive territorial defence, and this pattern was temporally-sensitive, with increased affiliation occurring before, rather than after, the cooperative act. Chimpanzees accessed a broader range of partners through increased interaction efficiency by switching between more partners with shorter interactions per partner. This pattern suggests a shared evolutionary basis of dynamic social readjustment in preparation for group-level social dilemmas in hominids, potentially providing the foundation for the formalized systems of affiliation found in human societies.
ER  -