Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS Global Public Health

Physiotherapists are underutilised in health-sector responses to gender-based violence: A cross-sectional survey of preparedness across Spanish-speaking countries

6 more authors
12 affiliations
  1. 1Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Anáhuac México, Mexico City, Mexico
  2. 2Independent Physiotherapist, Cali, Colombia
  3. 3Independent Physiotherapist, Avilés, Spain
  4. 4Scientific Society of Physiotherapy in Mental Health, College of Therapists of Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica
  5. 5Independent Physiotherapist, Coyhaique, Chile
  6. 6Mental Health Physiotherapy Association of Guatemala (ASOFISME), Guatemala City, Guatemala
  7. 7Physical Medicine Service, Hospital de Alta Complejidad Virgen de la Puerta, Trujillo, Peru
  8. 8Kinesiology and Physiotherapy Program, Universidad del Gran Rosario (UGR), Rosario, Argentina
  9. 9Faculty of Medicine, University of El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador
  10. 10Nutrition, Exercise & Social Equity (NExuS) Research Group, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  11. 11KU Leuven Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  12. 12Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia

Abstract

Gender-based violence (GBV) is a major global public health and human rights issue with wide-ranging physical and mental health consequences. Physiotherapists frequently work with populations and conditions plausibly linked to violence exposure, yet little is known about their preparedness to identify and respond to GBV in Spanish-speaking contexts. We conducted a cross-sectional online convenience survey of Spanish-speaking physiotherapists from Latin America and Spain using the Spanish-language Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey (PREMIS), originally developed and validated for intimate partner violence (IPV) and administered here with broader GBV framing (violencia basada en género) while retaining some IPV-specific items. The survey assessed self-reported preparation, self-perceived knowledge, objective knowledge, opinions, and practice issues related to GBV. Descriptive analyses were conducted across PREMIS subscales and item-level responses. A total of 719 physiotherapists from 15 countries were included in the analytic sample. Self-reported preparedness to identify and respond to GBV was low (mean preparation score 2.5/7), as was self-perceived knowledge (2.4/7). Nearly three-quarters of respondents reported not identifying any GBV cases in the previous six months, and engagement in response practices, such as risk assessment, safety planning, documentation, and referral was uncommon. Nearly half (45%) reported no formal GBV training. Respondents also reported limited awareness of institutional protocols, referral resources, and organisational supports for GBV response. Attitudes towards victim-survivors were generally supportive, with low endorsement of victim-blaming beliefs. Physiotherapists in this sample reported low preparedness, limited training, and substantial system-level barriers to responding to GBV in clinical practice. These findings suggest an underused opportunity to strengthen health-sector responses to GBV through physiotherapy education, professional training, and organisational infrastructure that supports safe identification, referral and trauma-informed care. Future research should evaluate strategies for embedding trauma-informed responses to GBV within routine physiotherapy practice.

Related

  1. Maternal critical care infrastructure and organisational preparedness in Türkiye: a national analysis of the MaCriCare cross-sectional survey
    Dudu Berrin Günaydın, Selin Erel, Miray Gözde Özdemir +4
    Annals of medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Healthcare professionals' communication practices and preparedness in organised human papillomavirus-based cervical Cancer screening: A cross-sectional study in Central Portugal.
    Rita Sousa, José Alberto Fonseca-Moutinho, Fábio Gomes +3
    Preventive medicine reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  3. Health workforce preparedness for sepsis care in Bahrain: a cross-sectional survey of guideline knowledge, attitudes, and practices
    K. A. O. Ebrahim, A. A. Jaber, R. B. Mirza
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  4. Assessing coping, loneliness, resilience and partner burden in patients with skin conditions: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study across 23 dermatology centres in 15 European countries
    Christina Schut, Francesca Sampogna, Jörg Kupfer +3
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Preparedness, awareness and ownership of young future healthcare professionals are associated with their willingness to contribute to health system resilience in a NATO collective defense scenario: a cross-sectional study among medical, nursing and paramedic students in Germany
    Lara Amling, Isabella Beyer, Felix Hambitzer +4
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{perez2026physiotherapists,
  title = {{Physiotherapists are underutilised in health-sector responses to gender-based violence: A cross-sectional survey of preparedness across Spanish-speaking countries}},
  author = {María Eugenia de León Pérez and Moisés Jonathan Magos Chong and Maira Alejandra Gamboa Gutiérrez and Jimena Figueroa Valero and Raquel García Tarrazo and Denis Montoya-Valverde and Paulina Nicole Cedas Ravena and Carmen María Gantenbein Leiva and Manuel Alexander Gonzales Odar and Jorgelina Dellacasa and Claudia Belen Aguilar Ruiz Velasco and Ana Catalina Mejía de Guardado and Grace McKeon and Davy Vancampfort and Megan Teychenne and Uzma Choudhry and Thea Baker and Simon Rosenbaum},
  journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0007075},
  url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007075},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Physiotherapists are underutilised in health-sector responses to gender-based violence: A cross-sectional survey of preparedness across Spanish-speaking countries
AU  - María Eugenia de León Pérez
AU  - Moisés Jonathan Magos Chong
AU  - Maira Alejandra Gamboa Gutiérrez
AU  - Jimena Figueroa Valero
AU  - Raquel García Tarrazo
AU  - Denis Montoya-Valverde
AU  - Paulina Nicole Cedas Ravena
AU  - Carmen María Gantenbein Leiva
AU  - Manuel Alexander Gonzales Odar
AU  - Jorgelina Dellacasa
AU  - Claudia Belen Aguilar Ruiz Velasco
AU  - Ana Catalina Mejía de Guardado
AU  - Grace McKeon
AU  - Davy Vancampfort
AU  - Megan Teychenne
AU  - Uzma Choudhry
AU  - Thea Baker
AU  - Simon Rosenbaum
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
JO  - PLOS Global Public Health
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007075
UR  - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007075
AB  - Gender-based violence (GBV) is a major global public health and human rights issue with wide-ranging physical and mental health consequences. Physiotherapists frequently work with populations and conditions plausibly linked to violence exposure, yet little is known about their preparedness to identify and respond to GBV in Spanish-speaking contexts. We conducted a cross-sectional online convenience survey of Spanish-speaking physiotherapists from Latin America and Spain using the Spanish-language Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey (PREMIS), originally developed and validated for intimate partner violence (IPV) and administered here with broader GBV framing (violencia basada en género) while retaining some IPV-specific items. The survey assessed self-reported preparation, self-perceived knowledge, objective knowledge, opinions, and practice issues related to GBV. Descriptive analyses were conducted across PREMIS subscales and item-level responses. A total of 719 physiotherapists from 15 countries were included in the analytic sample. Self-reported preparedness to identify and respond to GBV was low (mean preparation score 2.5/7), as was self-perceived knowledge (2.4/7). Nearly three-quarters of respondents reported not identifying any GBV cases in the previous six months, and engagement in response practices, such as risk assessment, safety planning, documentation, and referral was uncommon. Nearly half (45%) reported no formal GBV training. Respondents also reported limited awareness of institutional protocols, referral resources, and organisational supports for GBV response. Attitudes towards victim-survivors were generally supportive, with low endorsement of victim-blaming beliefs. Physiotherapists in this sample reported low preparedness, limited training, and substantial system-level barriers to responding to GBV in clinical practice. These findings suggest an underused opportunity to strengthen health-sector responses to GBV through physiotherapy education, professional training, and organisational infrastructure that supports safe identification, referral and trauma-informed care. Future research should evaluate strategies for embedding trauma-informed responses to GBV within routine physiotherapy practice.
SN  - 2767-3375
ER  -