Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCancer Medicine

Prognostic Value of Perioperative Inflammatory–Immune–Nutritional Indicators in Advanced Gallbladder Cancer

  1. 1Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China

Abstract

Objective To explore the perioperative changes in inflammatory–immune–nutritional indicators in patients with advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC), defined as American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage III–IV, and to assess whether individual indicators provide incremental prognostic information beyond conventional clinicopathological factors. Methods Patients with pathologically confirmed advanced GBC who underwent surgery at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Preoperative and postoperative Day 7 values of the albumin‐to‐alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR), albumin‐to‐globulin ratio (AGR), albumin–bilirubin score (ALBI), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were calculated. Perioperative dynamic changes were compared, and Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to evaluate the incremental prognostic value of these indicators. Results Among 103 patients with advanced GBC, all eight inflammatory–immune–nutritional indicators showed significant changes between the preoperative period and postoperative Day 7. Several preoperative and postoperative indicators were associated with cancer‐specific survival (CSS) in cutoff‐based exploratory analyses. After the incorporation of these indicators into clinicopathological models, most extended models showed varying degrees of improvement in discrimination and goodness of fit. Conclusion In this single‐center cohort, perioperative inflammatory–immune–nutritional indicators exhibit significant dynamic changes in advanced GBC and can improve, to a certain extent, the prognostic performance of models based on conventional clinicopathological characteristics. These indicators may serve as useful supplementary tools for risk stratification and individualized prognostic assessment in patients with advanced GBC.

Related

  1. Construction and validation of a nomogram based on inflammatory, nutritional and metabolic indicators for predicting the risk of papillary thyroid carcinoma.
    Ziyu Chen, Hang Su, Hongfeng Wu +4
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Inflammatory and immune-nutritional indices as prognostic markers of mortality after cardiac procedures: evidence from MIMIC-IV.
    Danyal Yarahmadi, Fatemeh Naseri Rad, Mohammad Baadkoube Hazaveh +7
    Journal of cardiothoracic surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMCDOAJPMC
  3. Interpretable Machine Learning Prognostic Model Integrating Inflammatory-Nutritional Biomarkers for Post-Prostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence: Development, Internal Validation, and Translational Target Exploration.
    Hao Wang, Yifei Zhang, Zhen Li +5
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  4. Multi-omics integration identifies PON2 as a prognostic biomarker and mediator of tumor microenvironment remodeling in gallbladder cancer
    Jian Yang, Lingbo Hu, Chao Yang +2
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Relationship Between Gallbladder Wall Thickness and Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Jay P Patel, Mohit K Badgurjar, Mitesh Asari +4
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{li2026prognostic,
  title = {{Prognostic Value of Perioperative Inflammatory–Immune–Nutritional Indicators in Advanced Gallbladder Cancer}},
  author = {Rongxuan Li and Bingchen Wang and Xiao Chen and Dayong Cao and Jianguo Zhou},
  journal = {Cancer Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/cam4.72351},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.72351},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prognostic Value of Perioperative Inflammatory–Immune–Nutritional Indicators in Advanced Gallbladder Cancer
AU  - Rongxuan Li
AU  - Bingchen Wang
AU  - Xiao Chen
AU  - Dayong Cao
AU  - Jianguo Zhou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
JO  - Cancer Medicine
DO  - 10.1002/cam4.72351
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.72351
AB  - Objective To explore the perioperative changes in inflammatory–immune–nutritional indicators in patients with advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC), defined as American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage III–IV, and to assess whether individual indicators provide incremental prognostic information beyond conventional clinicopathological factors. Methods Patients with pathologically confirmed advanced GBC who underwent surgery at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Preoperative and postoperative Day 7 values of the albumin‐to‐alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR), albumin‐to‐globulin ratio (AGR), albumin–bilirubin score (ALBI), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were calculated. Perioperative dynamic changes were compared, and Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to evaluate the incremental prognostic value of these indicators. Results Among 103 patients with advanced GBC, all eight inflammatory–immune–nutritional indicators showed significant changes between the preoperative period and postoperative Day 7. Several preoperative and postoperative indicators were associated with cancer‐specific survival (CSS) in cutoff‐based exploratory analyses. After the incorporation of these indicators into clinicopathological models, most extended models showed varying degrees of improvement in discrimination and goodness of fit. Conclusion In this single‐center cohort, perioperative inflammatory–immune–nutritional indicators exhibit significant dynamic changes in advanced GBC and can improve, to a certain extent, the prognostic performance of models based on conventional clinicopathological characteristics. These indicators may serve as useful supplementary tools for risk stratification and individualized prognostic assessment in patients with advanced GBC.
SN  - 2045-7634
ER  -