Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

Allogeneic CAR-T, CAR-NK, and in vivo CAR-T for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: comparative evidence, platform trade-offs, and translational challenges

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
  2. 2Department of Research and Development, Antengene Corporation
  3. 3School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-Sen University
  4. 4Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Abstract

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) remain treatment-dependent in many patients with severe, refractory, or organ-threatening disease. Deep B-cell depletion using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapies may induce clinical improvement and measurable immune reconstitution, but conventional autologous CAR-T manufacturing limits speed, standardization, and access. This structured narrative review compares allogeneic CAR-T, allogeneic CAR-natural killer (CAR-NK), and in vivo CAR-T. Bibliographic databases, trial registries, conference repositories, reference lists, and traceable sponsor, media, and regulatory sources were searched through 3 September 2026. Allogeneic CAR-T has the broadest clinical evidence base, although cohorts are small and mostly early-phase. All CAR-NK products with reported IMID clinical data are allogeneic; available studies suggest transient kinetics, repeat-infusion feasibility, and encouraging short-term tolerability, but durability is uncertain. Peer-reviewed in vivo evidence now includes a five-patient non-integrating LNP/linear mRNA report and a 16-patient integrating lentiviral report. Both are early, uncontrolled studies and neither supports class-wide inference. Disease-specific outcomes, background treatment, follow-up, and assays differ markedly. Complete treatment-free remission was distinguished from glucocorticoid withdrawal, immunosuppressant reduction, and remission on permitted therapy. CAR-cell, transgene DNA, and RNA detection were not pooled, and peripheral blood B-cell depletion was not treated as proof of tissue depletion. Naive-dominant B-cell recovery and declining autoantibodies indicate immune remodeling, not restored tolerance. No indirect efficacy ranking is justified. Prospective studies need standardized disease endpoints, treatment-free remission definitions, analyte-specific pharmacokinetics, paired blood–tissue pharmacodynamics, and long-term genomic, immune, and safety surveillance.

Related

  1. Stuck in traffic: a bispecific antibody-mediated immune re-engagement after allogeneic stem cell transplantation
    Stephanie Boisclair, Monica Wallin, Sally Ko +1
    HaematologicaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. Immune-Mediated Demyelinating Central Nervous System Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
    Marie Ugo, Aaliyah Shaikh, Charif Sidani +2
    Journal of Brown hospital medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) in Osteoarthritis: Immunomodulatory and Matrix-Supportive Potential, A2A Receptor-Associated Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Cellular immunotherapy for lung cancer: current clinical evidence, translational challenges, and future perspectives: a narrative review
    Nannan Ma, Chunxiang Shang
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-Based Genome Editing in Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases: Therapeutic Advances, Emerging Editing Platforms, and Translational Challenges
    Tosin Fakiyesi, Mmaduabuchi Ozioko, Oluwapelumi D Ogunseye +8
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{liang2026allogeneic,
  title = {{Allogeneic CAR-T, CAR-NK, and in vivo CAR-T for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: comparative evidence, platform trade-offs, and translational challenges}},
  author = {Zhenguo Liang and Mengyun Mao and Hui Xie and Yuhan Xing and Dongze Wu},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1931185},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1931185/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Allogeneic CAR-T, CAR-NK, and in vivo CAR-T for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: comparative evidence, platform trade-offs, and translational challenges
AU  - Zhenguo Liang
AU  - Mengyun Mao
AU  - Hui Xie
AU  - Yuhan Xing
AU  - Dongze Wu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1931185
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1931185/full
AB  - Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) remain treatment-dependent in many patients with severe, refractory, or organ-threatening disease. Deep B-cell depletion using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapies may induce clinical improvement and measurable immune reconstitution, but conventional autologous CAR-T manufacturing limits speed, standardization, and access. This structured narrative review compares allogeneic CAR-T, allogeneic CAR-natural killer (CAR-NK), and in vivo CAR-T. Bibliographic databases, trial registries, conference repositories, reference lists, and traceable sponsor, media, and regulatory sources were searched through 3 September 2026. Allogeneic CAR-T has the broadest clinical evidence base, although cohorts are small and mostly early-phase. All CAR-NK products with reported IMID clinical data are allogeneic; available studies suggest transient kinetics, repeat-infusion feasibility, and encouraging short-term tolerability, but durability is uncertain. Peer-reviewed in vivo evidence now includes a five-patient non-integrating LNP/linear mRNA report and a 16-patient integrating lentiviral report. Both are early, uncontrolled studies and neither supports class-wide inference. Disease-specific outcomes, background treatment, follow-up, and assays differ markedly. Complete treatment-free remission was distinguished from glucocorticoid withdrawal, immunosuppressant reduction, and remission on permitted therapy. CAR-cell, transgene DNA, and RNA detection were not pooled, and peripheral blood B-cell depletion was not treated as proof of tissue depletion. Naive-dominant B-cell recovery and declining autoantibodies indicate immune remodeling, not restored tolerance. No indirect efficacy ranking is justified. Prospective studies need standardized disease endpoints, treatment-free remission definitions, analyte-specific pharmacokinetics, paired blood–tissue pharmacodynamics, and long-term genomic, immune, and safety surveillance.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -