Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Association Between Birth Timing and Early Clinical Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  1. 1Department of Pediatrics, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34214, Turkey
  2. 2Clinics of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır 21090, Turkey
  3. 3Department of Pediatrics, Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır 21090, Turkey

Abstract

Background: The effect of birth timing on outcomes in very preterm infants remains controversial. This study evaluated the association between birth timing and early morbidity and mortality in infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Methods: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, inborn infants born at <32 weeks’ gestation between January 2021 and May 2023 were categorized as in-hours (weekdays 08:01–16:00) or out-of-hours (weekdays 16:01–08:00, weekends, official holidays). The primary outcome was a composite of early mortality (≤72 h) or severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grades III–IV). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for baseline confounders (Model 1); delivery-room resuscitation, a potential mediator, was added in Model 2. Results: Of 363 infants, 160 (44.1%) were born in-hours and 203 (55.9%) out-of-hours. The composite outcome occurred in 19.7% versus 12.5% (p = 0.091; Model 1 aOR 1.46, 95% CI 0.77–2.77). Overall mortality (32.5% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.023), early mortality (8.4% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.022), delivery-room resuscitation (56.7% vs. 36.9%, p < 0.001), and respiratory distress syndrome (69.0% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.012) were higher out-of-hours. Out-of-hours birth was associated with higher mortality in Model 1 (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.11–3.20), but the estimate was attenuated and imprecise in Model 2 (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 0.91–2.75). Conclusions: Out-of-hours birth was not significantly associated with the composite primary outcome but was associated with higher crude and baseline-adjusted mortality. Because delivery urgency, illness severity, and staffing at delivery were incompletely measured, residual confounding cannot be excluded.

Related

  1. Mortality and clinical outcomes in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus according to pharmacological treatment or expectant management: a retrospective cohort study.
    Javier Torres-Muñoz, Diana María Pérez Manrique, Lesly Georjany Escobar Gordillo +2
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  2. Development and internal validation of an exploratory clinical prediction model for MRI-defined white matter injury in moderate-to-late preterm infants: a single-center retrospective study
    Translational pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Very Preterm Infants Who Underwent Neonatal Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Joo Hi Kim, Sungbo Shim, Ching-yu Lin +8
    Yonsei Medical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  4. Growth and Clinical Outcomes Before and After Implementation of a Donor Human Milk Program in Very Preterm and/or Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
    Jacky Herzlich, Omer Less, Itamar Gilboa +2
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNutritionCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Clinical outcomes of preterm infants under 32 weeks who receive early enteral nutrition in a low- and middle-income country.
    Javier Torres-Muñoz, Lorena Chamorro, Julián Torres-Figueroa +3
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{asena2026association,
  title = {{Association Between Birth Timing and Early Clinical Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study}},
  author = {Muhammet Asena and Duygu Tunçel and Leyla Şero and Nilüfer Okur},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218282},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8282},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Association Between Birth Timing and Early Clinical Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study
AU  - Muhammet Asena
AU  - Duygu Tunçel
AU  - Leyla Şero
AU  - Nilüfer Okur
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218282
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8282
AB  - Background: The effect of birth timing on outcomes in very preterm infants remains controversial. This study evaluated the association between birth timing and early morbidity and mortality in infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Methods: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, inborn infants born at <32 weeks’ gestation between January 2021 and May 2023 were categorized as in-hours (weekdays 08:01–16:00) or out-of-hours (weekdays 16:01–08:00, weekends, official holidays). The primary outcome was a composite of early mortality (≤72 h) or severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grades III–IV). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for baseline confounders (Model 1); delivery-room resuscitation, a potential mediator, was added in Model 2. Results: Of 363 infants, 160 (44.1%) were born in-hours and 203 (55.9%) out-of-hours. The composite outcome occurred in 19.7% versus 12.5% (p = 0.091; Model 1 aOR 1.46, 95% CI 0.77–2.77). Overall mortality (32.5% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.023), early mortality (8.4% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.022), delivery-room resuscitation (56.7% vs. 36.9%, p < 0.001), and respiratory distress syndrome (69.0% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.012) were higher out-of-hours. Out-of-hours birth was associated with higher mortality in Model 1 (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.11–3.20), but the estimate was attenuated and imprecise in Model 2 (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 0.91–2.75). Conclusions: Out-of-hours birth was not significantly associated with the composite primary outcome but was associated with higher crude and baseline-adjusted mortality. Because delivery urgency, illness severity, and staffing at delivery were incompletely measured, residual confounding cannot be excluded.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -