The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of tuberculosis-affected people and households in low income, high burden settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis
8 affiliations
- 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Center for Tuberculosis, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- 2Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- 3Departments of Clinical Sciences and International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 4WALIMU, Kampala, Uganda
- 5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- 6Department of Medical Sciences, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Turin, Italy
- 7Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Departments of Clinical Sciences and International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 8Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death due to infectious disease worldwide. Social protection interventions can benefit TB-affected households. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the effectiveness of social protection on TB treatment and socioeconomic outcomes. We identified articles published from January 2012 to December 2025 by searching PubMed (includes MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science. We included studies that described at least one social protection intervention and reported on either TB treatment or socioeconomic outcomes for people with TB or TB-affected households. Random-effects meta-analysis was used for our primary outcome of interest, TB treatment success (treatment completion or cure). We performed a meta-regression to evaluate the association of study characteristics with odds of TB treatment success. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42022382181). Our search generated 55,975 articles. Of the 55 which were eligible for inclusion, 41 reported TB treatment outcomes, 8 reported on socioeconomic outcomes, and two studies reported both TB treatment and socioeconomic outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis of 26 articles found that people with TB who received social protection interventions during treatment had 2.15 times the odds of TB treatment success (95% CI 1.76, 2.64, I2 94.5%). Subgroup analysis indicated that whether a social protection intervention was TB sensitive or TB specific was a significant source of heterogeneity, although both increased the odds of TB treatment success. Both TB sensitive and TB specific social protection interventions significantly improve odds of TB treatment success. Outcomes and definitions used in our study have the potential to guide further research and implementation of social protection for TB-affected populations.
Related
- Systematic review and network meta-analysis of interventions for adults with simple obesity: Study protocol
- The dual burden of disease: Depression among patients with multidrug resistance tuberculosis in low-income and lower- middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Airway management and anaesthetic interventions for children with cleft lip and/or palate undergoing general anaesthesia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Educational and behavioural interventions for reducing fear of hypoglycaemia in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Interventions with mitochondrial-related effects in older adults with type 2 diabetes: Protocol for a systematic review with conditional network meta-analysis
BibTeX
@article{hudson2026impact,
title = {{The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of tuberculosis-affected people and households in low income, high burden settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis}},
author = {Mollie Hudson and Heather Todd and Talemwa Nalugwa and Ann Schraufnagel and Canice Christian and Delia Boccia and Tom Wingfield and Priya B. Shete},
journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0006704},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006704},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of tuberculosis-affected people and households in low income, high burden settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Mollie Hudson
AU - Heather Todd
AU - Talemwa Nalugwa
AU - Ann Schraufnagel
AU - Canice Christian
AU - Delia Boccia
AU - Tom Wingfield
AU - Priya B. Shete
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/03
JO - PLOS Global Public Health
DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006704
UR - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006704
AB - Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death due to infectious disease worldwide. Social protection interventions can benefit TB-affected households. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the effectiveness of social protection on TB treatment and socioeconomic outcomes. We identified articles published from January 2012 to December 2025 by searching PubMed (includes MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science. We included studies that described at least one social protection intervention and reported on either TB treatment or socioeconomic outcomes for people with TB or TB-affected households. Random-effects meta-analysis was used for our primary outcome of interest, TB treatment success (treatment completion or cure). We performed a meta-regression to evaluate the association of study characteristics with odds of TB treatment success. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42022382181). Our search generated 55,975 articles. Of the 55 which were eligible for inclusion, 41 reported TB treatment outcomes, 8 reported on socioeconomic outcomes, and two studies reported both TB treatment and socioeconomic outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis of 26 articles found that people with TB who received social protection interventions during treatment had 2.15 times the odds of TB treatment success (95% CI 1.76, 2.64, I2 94.5%). Subgroup analysis indicated that whether a social protection intervention was TB sensitive or TB specific was a significant source of heterogeneity, although both increased the odds of TB treatment success. Both TB sensitive and TB specific social protection interventions significantly improve odds of TB treatment success. Outcomes and definitions used in our study have the potential to guide further research and implementation of social protection for TB-affected populations.
SN - 2767-3375
ER -