Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0eLife

Expectation-driven gain modulation of preparatory spatial attention

  1. 1Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands

Abstract

The visual system can flexibly adjust attentional deployment to match task demands, but whether observers can proactively modulate the spatial scope of attention based on expectations about upcoming search difficulty remains unclear. According to the zoom lens model, attention can narrow or broaden its spatial extent, with narrower focus enhancing processing efficiency, a mechanism that would benefit target discrimination in crowded displays. We tested whether observers adjust attentional scope when expecting sparse versus dense search arrays by combining spatial cueing with block-wise manipulations of display density expectations. Participants performed a visual search task in which endogenous cues predicted target location, while blocks predominantly contained either sparse (1 target, 3 distractors) or dense (1 target, 7 distractors) displays. We applied inverted encoding models to broadband EEG data to reconstruct spatial channel tuning functions, enabling precise characterization of both the locus and breadth of attentional deployment. Behaviorally, expecting difficult searches selectively improved accuracy at cued locations without costs elsewhere. Consistent with this selective benefit, neural measurements revealed that expectancy enhanced the amplitude of spatially selective responses at the attended location but did not alter tuning width. These findings demonstrate that expectations about search difficulty modulate attention through gain-based signal enhancement rather than adjustments to spatial scope, revealing that preparatory attentional control operates via amplitude modulation within a stable spatial focus. This mechanism complements reactive attentional adjustments and provides an efficient means for the visual system to optimize processing under predictable task demands.

Related

  1. Dopamine modulation of motor and implicit learning contributions to auditory temporal attention
    Arnaud Zalta, Lena-Franziska Spitz, Alfons Schnitzler +2
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeuroscienceHAL
  2. Menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive intake alter the electrophysiological signature of selective auditory spatial attention
    M.-C. Schlueter, M. Pinnow, M. Bruene +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. VAD-EmotionNet: a spatial-spectral attention network for EEG emotion recognition in the 3D affective space
    Xiujun Li, Shen Yan, Dan Tong +2
    Cognitive NeurodynamicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textNeurosciencePMC
  4. Determining Reliable Neural Targets for enhancing Motor Sequence Learning: A preparatory study for focal tDCS
    A. Khan, M. Burke, E. Genc +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Variability of Head Motion Reveals Development of Spatial Attention
    M. Woestmann, D. Kunke, N. Wetzel
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{moorselaar2026expectationdriven,
  title = {{Expectation-driven gain modulation of preparatory spatial attention}},
  author = {Dirk van Moorselaar and Stefan van der Stigchel},
  journal = {eLife},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.7554/elife.110315},
  url = {https://elifesciences.org/articles/110315},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Expectation-driven gain modulation of preparatory spatial attention
AU  - Dirk van Moorselaar
AU  - Stefan van der Stigchel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
JO  - eLife
DO  - 10.7554/elife.110315
UR  - https://elifesciences.org/articles/110315
AB  - The visual system can flexibly adjust attentional deployment to match task demands, but whether observers can proactively modulate the spatial scope of attention based on expectations about upcoming search difficulty remains unclear. According to the zoom lens model, attention can narrow or broaden its spatial extent, with narrower focus enhancing processing efficiency, a mechanism that would benefit target discrimination in crowded displays. We tested whether observers adjust attentional scope when expecting sparse versus dense search arrays by combining spatial cueing with block-wise manipulations of display density expectations. Participants performed a visual search task in which endogenous cues predicted target location, while blocks predominantly contained either sparse (1 target, 3 distractors) or dense (1 target, 7 distractors) displays. We applied inverted encoding models to broadband EEG data to reconstruct spatial channel tuning functions, enabling precise characterization of both the locus and breadth of attentional deployment. Behaviorally, expecting difficult searches selectively improved accuracy at cued locations without costs elsewhere. Consistent with this selective benefit, neural measurements revealed that expectancy enhanced the amplitude of spatially selective responses at the attended location but did not alter tuning width. These findings demonstrate that expectations about search difficulty modulate attention through gain-based signal enhancement rather than adjustments to spatial scope, revealing that preparatory attentional control operates via amplitude modulation within a stable spatial focus. This mechanism complements reactive attentional adjustments and provides an efficient means for the visual system to optimize processing under predictable task demands.
SN  - 2050-084X
ER  -