Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Sociologia Ruralis

‘Just Love Us, We'll do the rest’ . Competing repertoires of agrarian anti‐environmentalism

Abstract

Agrarian mobilisations no longer target solely public authorities, legislation and its economic and professional consequences. They are now increasingly structured to respond to other social movements and produce a structured discourse aimed at public opinion. In France, the denunciation of ‘agribashing’ generated significant activity on Twitter (now X) between 2018 and 2020, before disappearing almost completely thereafter. Drawing on online data analysis and traditional qualitative methods (interviews and observations of public and private events), this article analyses how the agrarian question shifted onto a public, controversial terrain, which reframes economic and environmental issues in terms of a moral question. We show the emergence of a new ‘positive’ repertoire of contention, promoting technological modernity and the responsible ethics of producers, which compete with a more contentious repertoire that voices the resentment of a large number of farmers faced with what they perceive as an ‘unfair’ criticism from civil society. The divergence of repertoires can thus be interpreted as an internal backlash within the hegemonic agrarian discourse on productivism.

Related

  1. Integrating agrarian differentiation and labor mobility into TAPE-based assessments of agroecology. A methodological exploration in the Cambodian rice sector
    Titouan Filloux, Jean-Christophe Diepart, Mathilde Sester +3
    Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyHAL
  2. Systemic antibody repertoires target specific microbial antigens in patients with colorectal cancer
    G. Innocenti, S. Brezina, I. Barozzi +7
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  3. Reconstruction of FACS-partitioned Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoires from FACS-partitioned B and T Cell Subsets
    H. Zhao, A. Morgan, M. Yasuda +9
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  4. Current state of bioacoustics research of vocal repertoires
    D. M. Grijseels, P. Malkemper
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  5. Poxvirus gene repertoires are shaped by expansion-biased birth-and-death dynamics and genome architectural constraints
    A. Plianchaisuk, S. Lytras, H. Hikida +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{brunier2026just,
  title = {{‘Just Love Us, We'll do the rest’ . Competing repertoires of agrarian anti‐environmentalism}},
  author = {Sylvain Brunier and Baptiste Kotras},
  journal = {Sociologia Ruralis},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1111/soru.70026},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05732720v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - ‘Just Love Us, We'll do the rest’ . Competing repertoires of agrarian anti‐environmentalism
AU  - Sylvain Brunier
AU  - Baptiste Kotras
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
JO  - Sociologia Ruralis
DO  - 10.1111/soru.70026
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05732720v1
AB  - Agrarian mobilisations no longer target solely public authorities, legislation and its economic and professional consequences. They are now increasingly structured to respond to other social movements and produce a structured discourse aimed at public opinion. In France, the denunciation of ‘agribashing’ generated significant activity on Twitter (now X) between 2018 and 2020, before disappearing almost completely thereafter. Drawing on online data analysis and traditional qualitative methods (interviews and observations of public and private events), this article analyses how the agrarian question shifted onto a public, controversial terrain, which reframes economic and environmental issues in terms of a moral question. We show the emergence of a new ‘positive’ repertoire of contention, promoting technological modernity and the responsible ethics of producers, which compete with a more contentious repertoire that voices the resentment of a large number of farmers faced with what they perceive as an ‘unfair’ criticism from civil society. The divergence of repertoires can thus be interpreted as an internal backlash within the hegemonic agrarian discourse on productivism.
SN  - 0038-0199
SN  - 1467-9523
ER  -