Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC surgery

Modified Kraske Procedure for retrorectal tumors: Early postoperative outcomes and surgical site infection rates in a single-center experience.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  2. 2Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. [email protected].
  3. 3Department of General Surgery, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  4. 4Department of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the early postoperative morbidity rates with a particular focus on surgical site infection rates, in patients undergoing resection for retrorectal tumors with the modified Kraske Procedure.Methods

This descriptive observational case series study included patients who underwent resection for retrorectal tumors performing the modified Kraske Procedure between August 2006 and August 2025. Patients with recurrent disease or a history of pelvic radiotherapy or chemotherapy were excluded. The primary outcome was early postoperative morbidity, especially in terms of surgical site infections, which was defined as complications occurring within the first 30 days after surgery.Results

Among 35 patients operated for retrorectal tumors, 23 (65.7%) patients underwent a resection performing the modified Kraske Procedure and were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were female (82.6%), with a mean age of 40.3 ± 15.8 years. The mean tumor size was 42.5 ± 10.0 mm, and most lesions were benign (87%). Postoperative complications occurred in three (13%) patients, with surgical site infection observed in only one (4.3%) patient. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.8 ± 1.9 days.Conclusion

The modified Kraske Procedure was associated with a low surgical site infection rate and acceptable early postoperative morbidity in this series. This technique may represent a feasible surgical modification for selected retrorectal tumors and warrants further evaluation in comparative studies.

Related

  1. The Modified Nipple-Areola Preservation Procedure: An Evolution of the Technique After 10 Years of Experience.
    James A Mentz, Carlos A Martinez, Michelle Shen +2
    Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. Longitudinal Drain-Fluid Proteomics Reveals Procedure-Specific Signatures of Postoperative Leakage after Pancreatic and Colorectal Surgery
    A. Jessernig, V. M. Agboola, S. Pfammatter +4
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  3. Outcomes of Revision Modified Broström Procedure with Periosteal Flap Augmentation in Patients with Recurrent Chronic Ankle Instability
    Jong Jin Moon, Myeong Jun Song, Jun Young Lee
    Clinics in orthopedic surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Long-term results of the modified Dunn procedure in slipped capital femoral epiphysis : a minimum of ten-year follow-up
    Alessandro Aprato, Andrea Audisio, Samuele Grilli +5
    Bone & joint openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. Reply to Vural, Ü. Comment on “Akkaya et al. Posterior Teflon-Felt-Reinforced Coronary Button Anastomosis in a Modified Bentall Procedure: Early Outcomes in a Single-Center Retrospective Study. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 2546”
    Özgür Akkaya, Izatullah Jalalzai, Ümit Arslan
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{bayraktar2026modified,
  title = {{Modified Kraske Procedure for retrorectal tumors: Early postoperative outcomes and surgical site infection rates in a single-center experience.}},
  author = {Adem Bayraktar and Cemil Burak Kulle and Ozan Pastacıgil and Halil Alper Bozkurt and Melek Büyük and Neslihan Berker and İlker Özgür and Metin Keskin and Mehmet Türker Bulut},
  journal = {BMC surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12893-026-03987-w},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897508},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Modified Kraske Procedure for retrorectal tumors: Early postoperative outcomes and surgical site infection rates in a single-center experience.
AU  - Adem Bayraktar
AU  - Cemil Burak Kulle
AU  - Ozan Pastacıgil
AU  - Halil Alper Bozkurt
AU  - Melek Büyük
AU  - Neslihan Berker
AU  - İlker Özgür
AU  - Metin Keskin
AU  - Mehmet Türker Bulut
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC surgery
DO  - 10.1186/s12893-026-03987-w
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897508
AB  - Objective  The aim of this study is to evaluate the early postoperative morbidity rates with a particular focus on surgical site infection rates, in patients undergoing resection for retrorectal tumors with the modified Kraske Procedure.Methods  This descriptive observational case series study included patients who underwent resection for retrorectal tumors performing the modified Kraske Procedure between August 2006 and August 2025. Patients with recurrent disease or a history of pelvic radiotherapy or chemotherapy were excluded. The primary outcome was early postoperative morbidity, especially in terms of surgical site infections, which was defined as complications occurring within the first 30 days after surgery.Results  Among 35 patients operated for retrorectal tumors, 23 (65.7%) patients underwent a resection performing the modified Kraske Procedure and were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were female (82.6%), with a mean age of 40.3 ± 15.8 years. The mean tumor size was 42.5 ± 10.0 mm, and most lesions were benign (87%). Postoperative complications occurred in three (13%) patients, with surgical site infection observed in only one (4.3%) patient. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.8 ± 1.9 days.Conclusion  The modified Kraske Procedure was associated with a low surgical site infection rate and acceptable early postoperative morbidity in this series. This technique may represent a feasible surgical modification for selected retrorectal tumors and warrants further evaluation in comparative studies.
SN  - 1471-2482
ER  -