Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDCirculation Journal

Interpreting Low Pressure Pullback Gradient in Non-Culprit Lesions With Quantitative Flow Ratio ≥0.80

  • Masahiro Hoshino
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

0.84, remain prognostically relevant.2 Second, lower PPG suggests a less focal distribution of epicardial resistance, whereas plaque vulnerability, including lipid-rich plaque and thin-cap fibroatheroma, has been associated with higher PPG. 3 Thus, comparison of baseline angiographic severity, QFR distribution, and outcomes between low QFR/high QFR-PPG and low QFR/low QFR-PPG lesions would be informative in determining whether the prognostic signal primarily reflects reduced QFR itself or whether low QFR-PPG carries additional meaning beyond QFR.

Related

  1. Interpreting Low Pressure Pullback Gradient in Non-Culprit Lesions With Quantitative Flow Ratio ≥0.80 ― Reply ―
    Sho Nakao, Takayuki Ishihara, Toshiaki Mano
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaJ-STAGE
  2. Association of Multimodal Intracoronary Imaging-Derived Plaque Morphology with the Pathophysiological Disease Patterns Assessed by the Quantitative Flow Ratio-Pullback Pressure Gradient
    Eisuke Usui, Yoshihisa Kanaji, Masahiro Hada +12
    Journal of Atherosclerosis and ThrombosisPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaJ-STAGE
  3. Predictive models for trans-stenotic pressure gradient in the transverse sinus based on multimodal correlates
    Yan Huang, Linkun Cai, Xiaoyu Qiu +8
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  4. Innovative application of pressure gradient measurement in internal carotid stenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (NOTICE-CAS): study protocol for a randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial
    Krzysztof Ściborski, Artur Telichowski, Natalia Świątoniowska-Lonc +19
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  5. Intracranial pulsatile pressure gradient: a hypothesis and the potential role of dual intracranial pressure monitoring
    Georgios Tsermoulas
    Frontiers in SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{hoshino2026interpreting,
  title = {{Interpreting Low Pressure Pullback Gradient in Non-Culprit Lesions With Quantitative Flow Ratio ≥0.80}},
  author = {Masahiro Hoshino},
  journal = {Circulation Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1253/circj.cj-26-0406},
  url = {https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/90/9/90_CJ-26-0406/_article},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Interpreting Low Pressure Pullback Gradient in Non-Culprit Lesions With Quantitative Flow Ratio ≥0.80
AU  - Masahiro Hoshino
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/25
JO  - Circulation Journal
DO  - 10.1253/circj.cj-26-0406
UR  - https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/90/9/90_CJ-26-0406/_article
AB  - 0.84, remain prognostically relevant.2 Second, lower PPG suggests a less focal distribution of epicardial resistance, whereas plaque vulnerability, including lipid-rich plaque and thin-cap fibroatheroma, has been associated with higher PPG. 3 Thus, comparison of baseline angiographic severity, QFR distribution, and outcomes between low QFR/high QFR-PPG and low QFR/low QFR-PPG lesions would be informative in determining whether the prognostic signal primarily reflects reduced QFR itself or whether low QFR-PPG carries additional meaning beyond QFR.
SN  - 1347-4820
SN  - 1346-9843
ER  -