State Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer and Food Insufficiency
8 affiliations
- 1National Clinician Scholars Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- 2Division of General Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia
- 3Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- 4PolicyLab, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- 5Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- 6Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- 7Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- 8Division of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Abstract
Importance: Children who receive free or reduced-price school meals often face increased hunger during the summer, when school-based meals are unavailable. Since 2024, states may opt into implementing the Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer (SEBT) program, which provides low-income families a one-time, federally funded grocery benefit of $120 per school-aged child.
Objective: To examine the association between state implementation of SEBT and subsequent household food insufficiency among SEBT-eligible, low-income households with school-aged children.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used demographic and health data from January to September 2024 cycles of the nationally representative Household Pulse Survey conducted by the US Census Bureau. Eligible households included children aged 5 to 17 years who were eligible for SEBT based on reported Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) receipt and/or income 185% of the federal poverty level (FPL) or below. Data analysis was performed between April 2025 and August 2026.
Exposure: State-level implementation of SEBT between May and August 2024 (treated vs untreated states).
Main Outcomes and Measures: Household food insufficiency, measured by a respondent indicating they sometimes or often did not have enough food in their household during the previous 7 days.
Results: Among 31 059 SEBT-eligible households (1090 Asian [3.5%], 5692 Black [18.3%], 5845 Hispanic [18.8%], 21 166 White [68.1%]), the majority of households in both untreated (18 states) and treated (33 states, including District of Columbia) states had income below 185% FPL (10 233 [93.4%] and 17 105 [92.0%], respectively). Among 11 334 households in untreated states, 4392 received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (42.6%) and 1196 received Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) benefits (12.3%); among 19 725 households in treated states, 9512 (50.4%) received SNAP, and 2126 (12.3%) received WIC. Among low-income families (185% FPL or below) with school-aged children, household food insufficiency increased by 4.0 percentage points (95% CI, 2.1 to 5.9 percentage points) during the summer compared with nonsummer months. Only a mean (SD) 30.3% (8.3) of SEBT-eligible households in treated states reported receiving SEBT. State implementation of SEBT was not significantly associated with a change in food insufficiency among SEBT-eligible households (0.8 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.4 to 4.0 percentage points).
Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, household food insufficiency increased significantly during summer months among low-income households of school-aged children and state implementation of SEBT was not significantly associated with a change in food insufficiency among SEBT-eligible households.
Related
- Precision Cervical Reconstruction: A State-Dependent Operative Framework for Cervical Insufficiency
- State Benefit Issuance Systems and Prenatal WIC Participation Trends During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Beyond community state types: vaginal microbial diversity and CST-IV signatures are associated with pregnancy in euploid embryo transfer cycles
- Long-term cyclic ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome with extreme fluctuations and adrenal insufficiency
- Chromosomal and genetic causes of primary ovarian insufficiency in the Utah population
BibTeX
@article{revak2026state,
title = {{State Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer and Food Insufficiency}},
author = {Sarah Revak and Senbagam Virudachalam and Christina A. Roberto and Justine Shults and Diana Montoya-Williams and DanaRose Negro and Aditi Vasan},
journal = {JAMA Network Open},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.42161},
url = {https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2856261},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - State Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer and Food Insufficiency
AU - Sarah Revak
AU - Senbagam Virudachalam
AU - Christina A. Roberto
AU - Justine Shults
AU - Diana Montoya-Williams
AU - DanaRose Negro
AU - Aditi Vasan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/05
JO - JAMA Network Open
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.42161
UR - https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2856261
AB - Importance: Children who receive free or reduced-price school meals often face increased hunger during the summer, when school-based meals are unavailable. Since 2024, states may opt into implementing the Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer (SEBT) program, which provides low-income families a one-time, federally funded grocery benefit of $120 per school-aged child. Objective: To examine the association between state implementation of SEBT and subsequent household food insufficiency among SEBT-eligible, low-income households with school-aged children. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used demographic and health data from January to September 2024 cycles of the nationally representative Household Pulse Survey conducted by the US Census Bureau. Eligible households included children aged 5 to 17 years who were eligible for SEBT based on reported Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) receipt and/or income 185% of the federal poverty level (FPL) or below. Data analysis was performed between April 2025 and August 2026. Exposure: State-level implementation of SEBT between May and August 2024 (treated vs untreated states). Main Outcomes and Measures: Household food insufficiency, measured by a respondent indicating they sometimes or often did not have enough food in their household during the previous 7 days. Results: Among 31 059 SEBT-eligible households (1090 Asian [3.5%], 5692 Black [18.3%], 5845 Hispanic [18.8%], 21 166 White [68.1%]), the majority of households in both untreated (18 states) and treated (33 states, including District of Columbia) states had income below 185% FPL (10 233 [93.4%] and 17 105 [92.0%], respectively). Among 11 334 households in untreated states, 4392 received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (42.6%) and 1196 received Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) benefits (12.3%); among 19 725 households in treated states, 9512 (50.4%) received SNAP, and 2126 (12.3%) received WIC. Among low-income families (185% FPL or below) with school-aged children, household food insufficiency increased by 4.0 percentage points (95% CI, 2.1 to 5.9 percentage points) during the summer compared with nonsummer months. Only a mean (SD) 30.3% (8.3) of SEBT-eligible households in treated states reported receiving SEBT. State implementation of SEBT was not significantly associated with a change in food insufficiency among SEBT-eligible households (0.8 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.4 to 4.0 percentage points). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, household food insufficiency increased significantly during summer months among low-income households of school-aged children and state implementation of SEBT was not significantly associated with a change in food insufficiency among SEBT-eligible households.
SN - 2574-3805
ER -