Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,616 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Medical Education

Do physiotherapy students know enough about the pelvic floor? The impact of university education: a cross-sectional study

  1. 1Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye
  2. 2Faculty of Bor Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Bor- Nigde, Türkiye
  3. 3Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Türkiye

Abstract

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) significantly affects quality of life, and physiotherapists play a key role in its conservative management. This study aimed to assess the knowledge levels of physiotherapy and rehabilitation students in Türkiye regarding UI, pelvic floor health, and pelvic organ prolapse, and to identify factors influencing their knowledge.

Methods: A multi-centred, cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2022 and November 2023 among undergraduate physiotherapy students from 21 universities. Participants completed validated tools, including the Incontinence Quiz, Pelvic Floor Health Knowledge Quiz, and Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire. Data were analysed using non-parametric tests, including Spearman correlation to assess relationships between variables.

Results: A total of 437 students participated. Fourth-year students demonstrated significantly higher knowledge scores compared to lower-year students (p < 0.001). Students who had received specific UI education scored significantly better across all questionnaires (p < 0.001). Female students outperformed male students in pelvic floor health and prolapse knowledge assessments (p < 0.001). However, only 3.7% of students reported clinical experience with UI patients.

Conclusions: Although knowledge levels improved progressively with academic advancement and targeted education, significant gaps remain, particularly in early academic years and clinical exposure. Structured and progressive integration of UI education within physiotherapy curricula is recommended. Future research should explore the impact of educational interventions on both theoretical knowledge and clinical competencies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05702164, registered on 27 January 2023, retrospectively registered. URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05702164.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10049-5.

Related

  1. Association between secondary school nutrition education and dietary behaviour in UK university students: a cross-sectional study
    Bokamoso Lame Zitha, Esther Ariyo
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Does medical education protect against nicotine dependence? A comparison of e-cigarette use among physiotherapy and humanities students
    Józefa Dąbek, Magdalena Szynal, Patryk Brasse +3
    Frontiers in PsychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  3. Food Insecurity Among University Students: Evidence from Three Cross-Sectional Surveys, 2020–2024
    Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani, Seema Mihrshahi
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  4. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Associated Health-Risk Behaviors Among University Students in Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
    Hasan Hüseyin Çam, Fadime Ustuner Top
    Journal of Child & Adolescent TraumaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  5. The relationship between smartphone addiction, Mediterranean diet adherence, body composition, and quality of life among university students: a cross-sectional study
    Çağlar Akçalı, Mehmet Özyurt, Aziz Korkmaz
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{eroglu2026physiotherapy,
  title = {{Do physiotherapy students know enough about the pelvic floor? The impact of university education: a cross-sectional study}},
  author = {Havva Sumeyye Eroglu and Aslı Demirtaş and Gürkan Demirtaş and Arife Akbulut Bayrak},
  journal = {BMC Medical Education},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12909-026-10049-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10049-5},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Do physiotherapy students know enough about the pelvic floor? The impact of university education: a cross-sectional study
AU  - Havva Sumeyye Eroglu
AU  - Aslı Demirtaş
AU  - Gürkan Demirtaş
AU  - Arife Akbulut Bayrak
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/11
JO  - BMC Medical Education
DO  - 10.1186/s12909-026-10049-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10049-5
AB  - Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) significantly affects quality of life, and physiotherapists play a key role in its conservative management. This study aimed to assess the knowledge levels of physiotherapy and rehabilitation students in Türkiye regarding UI, pelvic floor health, and pelvic organ prolapse, and to identify factors influencing their knowledge.  Methods: A multi-centred, cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2022 and November 2023 among undergraduate physiotherapy students from 21 universities. Participants completed validated tools, including the Incontinence Quiz, Pelvic Floor Health Knowledge Quiz, and Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire. Data were analysed using non-parametric tests, including Spearman correlation to assess relationships between variables.  Results: A total of 437 students participated. Fourth-year students demonstrated significantly higher knowledge scores compared to lower-year students (p < 0.001). Students who had received specific UI education scored significantly better across all questionnaires (p < 0.001). Female students outperformed male students in pelvic floor health and prolapse knowledge assessments (p < 0.001). However, only 3.7% of students reported clinical experience with UI patients.  Conclusions: Although knowledge levels improved progressively with academic advancement and targeted education, significant gaps remain, particularly in early academic years and clinical exposure. Structured and progressive integration of UI education within physiotherapy curricula is recommended. Future research should explore the impact of educational interventions on both theoretical knowledge and clinical competencies.  Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05702164, registered on 27 January 2023, retrospectively registered. URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05702164.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10049-5.
SN  - 1472-6920
ER  -