Prophylactic Intramedullary Nailing Following Femoral Lengthening in Congenital Femoral Deficiency: A Retrospective Comparative Study
- 1Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Doctoral School, 60-812 Poznan, Poland
- 2Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Department of Spine Disorders and Pediatric Orthopedics, 61-545 Poznan, Poland
Abstract
Background: Fracture of newly formed bone (the regenerate) after EF (External Fixator) removal is a serious complication of bone lengthening in Congenital Femoral Deficiency (CFD). This study aimed to determine whether prophylactic intramedullary nailing (IMN) at the time of EF removal reduces the risk of femoral fractures in CFD and to evaluate its safety. Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 53 CFD patients who underwent femoral lengthening (44 in the IMN group, 9 in the historical no-IMN group). We analyzed the incidence of fractures, infections, and unplanned surgeries. The predictive value of Fischgrund principles and Li classification for fracture risk was evaluated. Results: The fracture rate was 11.3% (6/53). The IMN group had fewer fractures (6.8%) versus the no-IMN group (33.3%, p = 0.054). Surgical treatment risk for femoral fracture was significantly lower in the IMN group (2.3% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.05). Despite complications in the IMN group (4.5% infection rate, 4.5% nail malposition rate, 2.3% hip dislocation), the rate of unplanned surgery was lower than in the no-IMN group (11.4% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.12). Associations between regenerate morphology and subsequent fracture occurrence were observed only in the historical no-IMN group. Prophylactic nailing may provide mechanical support in patients with less mature regenerate. Conclusions: In this retrospective study with a historical comparison group (no-IMN), prophylactic intramedullary nailing was associated with fewer fractures requiring surgery after femoral lengthening with EF in CFD.
Related
- Robot-assisted navigation combined with a double reverse traction reduction frame for retrograde intramedullary nailing of extra-articular distal femoral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study
- Lateral-Only Flexible Intramedullary Nailing for Pediatric Tibial Shaft Fractures: An Early Comparative Experience With a Novel Technique to Reduce Symptomatic Implant Prominence
- Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Bilateral Cosmetic Femoral Lengthening Using the Lengthening over Nail Technique: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
- A comparative study of Kirschner wire intramedullary fixation versus bicortical fixation for metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the pediatric distal radius.
- Prophylactic Carbetocin Versus Oxytocin and Blood Loss After Vaginal Delivery: Agent Selection and Confounding by Indication in a Retrospective Cohort Study.
BibTeX
@article{tschurl2026prophylactic,
title = {{Prophylactic Intramedullary Nailing Following Femoral Lengthening in Congenital Femoral Deficiency: A Retrospective Comparative Study}},
author = {Jędrzej Tschurl and Tomasz Kotwicki and Piotr Janusz and Milud Shadi},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15218564},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8564},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Prophylactic Intramedullary Nailing Following Femoral Lengthening in Congenital Femoral Deficiency: A Retrospective Comparative Study
AU - Jędrzej Tschurl
AU - Tomasz Kotwicki
AU - Piotr Janusz
AU - Milud Shadi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15218564
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8564
AB - Background: Fracture of newly formed bone (the regenerate) after EF (External Fixator) removal is a serious complication of bone lengthening in Congenital Femoral Deficiency (CFD). This study aimed to determine whether prophylactic intramedullary nailing (IMN) at the time of EF removal reduces the risk of femoral fractures in CFD and to evaluate its safety. Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 53 CFD patients who underwent femoral lengthening (44 in the IMN group, 9 in the historical no-IMN group). We analyzed the incidence of fractures, infections, and unplanned surgeries. The predictive value of Fischgrund principles and Li classification for fracture risk was evaluated. Results: The fracture rate was 11.3% (6/53). The IMN group had fewer fractures (6.8%) versus the no-IMN group (33.3%, p = 0.054). Surgical treatment risk for femoral fracture was significantly lower in the IMN group (2.3% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.05). Despite complications in the IMN group (4.5% infection rate, 4.5% nail malposition rate, 2.3% hip dislocation), the rate of unplanned surgery was lower than in the no-IMN group (11.4% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.12). Associations between regenerate morphology and subsequent fracture occurrence were observed only in the historical no-IMN group. Prophylactic nailing may provide mechanical support in patients with less mature regenerate. Conclusions: In this retrospective study with a historical comparison group (no-IMN), prophylactic intramedullary nailing was associated with fewer fractures requiring surgery after femoral lengthening with EF in CFD.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -