Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Distributional Quantum Query Complexity

Abstract

Quantum query complexity enjoys a variety of pleasing joint computation properties: for example, a composition theorem asserting Q(f∘ g)=Θ(Q(f)Q(g)) for all Boolean functions f and g; a direct sum theorem asserting that computing k copies of a function (or search problem) costs Ω(k) times as much as the cost of computing one copy; and a direct product theorem asserting that for Boolean functions, even succeeding at the direct sum problem with exponentially small probability still requires Ω(k) times the cost of computing one copy to bounded error. However, all of these results are strictly for worst-case quantum query complexity. For example, if we have a fixed distribution μ over inputs, the direct sum theorem says nothing about the quantum query complexity of computing k copies of f when the input comes from the product distribution μk instead of being worst-case. (Note that while a standard Yao-type minimax theorem guarantees a hard distribution for the direct sum problem, there's no guarantee that this hard distribution is a product distribution.) A similar problem occurs for the direct product theorem and the composition theorem: none of these results respect distributions. In this work, we give distributional joint computation lower bounds for the composition, direct sum, and direct product problems. Along the way, we introduce some new tools for handling quantum query lower bounds, including (a) a new ``multiplicative'' variant of the γ2 norm (which we use in place of the multiplicative adversary method for proving the direct product theorem), and (b) a new ``Shaltiel-free'' measure of quantum query complexity, which we show characterizes the composition behavior of distributional quantum query complexity and satisfies pleasing properties.

Related

  1. Near-Optimal Separations of Certificate Complexity from Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity
    Andris Ambainis, Jānis Iraids, Martins Kokainis
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Quantum Query Complexity Beyond the Worst Case
    Srinivasan Arunachalam, Yanlin Chen, Amin Shiraz Gilani
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Quantum Query Complexity of Tournament Solutions
    Pragya Arora, Udit Kumar
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Optimal query complexity for fractional quantum evolution
    Anthony Yuezhang Liu, Adam Wesołowski, Jayne Thompson +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Quantum Query Complexity of Maximum Degree and its Generalizations
    Amin Shiraz Gilani, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{bendavid2026distributional,
  title = {{Distributional Quantum Query Complexity}},
  author = {Shalev Ben-David and M. H. Ebtehaj},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.06835},
  eprint = {2610.06835},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06835},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Distributional Quantum Query Complexity
AU  - Shalev Ben-David
AU  - M. H. Ebtehaj
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.06835
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06835
AB  - Quantum query complexity enjoys a variety of pleasing joint computation properties: for example, a composition theorem asserting Q(f∘ g)=Θ(Q(f)Q(g)) for all Boolean functions f and g; a direct sum theorem asserting that computing k copies of a function (or search problem) costs Ω(k) times as much as the cost of computing one copy; and a direct product theorem asserting that for Boolean functions, even succeeding at the direct sum problem with exponentially small probability still requires Ω(k) times the cost of computing one copy to bounded error. However, all of these results are strictly for worst-case quantum query complexity. For example, if we have a fixed distribution μ over inputs, the direct sum theorem says nothing about the quantum query complexity of computing k copies of f when the input comes from the product distribution μ^k instead of being worst-case. (Note that while a standard Yao-type minimax theorem guarantees a hard distribution for the direct sum problem, there's no guarantee that this hard distribution is a product distribution.) A similar problem occurs for the direct product theorem and the composition theorem: none of these results respect distributions. In this work, we give distributional joint computation lower bounds for the composition, direct sum, and direct product problems. Along the way, we introduce some new tools for handling quantum query lower bounds, including (a) a new ``multiplicative'' variant of the γ_2 norm (which we use in place of the multiplicative adversary method for proving the direct product theorem), and (b) a new ``Shaltiel-free'' measure of quantum query complexity, which we show characterizes the composition behavior of distributional quantum query complexity and satisfies pleasing properties.
ER  -