Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Geoscientific Model Development

Process-based upgrades to the WRF multi-layer green-roof scheme (WRF-MLGR v2.0) and evaluation against field observations

  1. 1University of Guelph (Guelph, Canada)

Abstract

Green roofs can moderate urban heat by increasing latent heat flux and reducing sensible heat flux. However, capturing these effects in models depends on accurate representation of key green-roof processes, including substrate heat and moisture transport, soil-vegetation-atmosphere energy and moisture exchanges, interactions with the underlying roof, and drainage. Here we introduce targeted, process-based updates to the green-roof scheme (hereafter, MLGR) within the multi-layer urban canopy model (BEP-BEM) in the WRF mesoscale model to address key limitations in the original formulation. The updates include a non-linear dependence of soil thermal conductivity on moisture, vegetation-modulated surface thermal conductivity, explicit soil-surface evaporation, multi-layer root water uptake for transpiration, and canopy interception with evaporation and dew formation. We evaluate the original and modified MLGR schemes using hourly observations from an extensive sedum roof in London, Canada, for “summer” (1 July–31 August 2014) and “fall” (1 September–31 October 2014) periods. We also analyze 11–18 October 2025, when green roof modules were placed directly on the roof deck – which corresponds to the model's lower boundary assumption. Following implementation of the process-based improvements, model–measurement agreement for the conductive heat flux is markedly improved: RMSE is reduced from 105.9 to 24.0 W m ⁻² in summer and from 94.2 to 24.0 W m ⁻² in fall and the model produces more realistic overall green roof energy partitioning. The modified model better captures post-rain increases in latent heat flux ( Q E ) and improves the timing and magnitude of daytime turbulent latent and sensible heat flux peaks ( Q E and Q H ). Drainage is reduced relative to the original scheme; however, it remains slightly underestimated during summer and slightly overestimated during fall, and biases persist in surface temperature (warm during the day and cool at night) and in the magnitude and variability of Q E . Overall, the revised MLGR physics improves surface-flux realism, and future development should focus on developing a more realistic vegetation canopy submodule.

Versions

Related

  1. Evaluation of HNO3, SO2, and NH3 in the Surface Tiled Aerosol and Gaseous Exchange (STAGE) option in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model version 5.3.2 against field-scale, in situ and satellite observations
    Jesse O. Bash, John T. Walker, Zhiyong Wu +10
    Geoscientific model developmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral earth scienceEurope PMC
  2. Evaluation of CMIP6 model performance against GHCND station observations across Asian cities
    Benjamin Goodsell
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceEarthArXiv
  3. Evaluation of HNO ₃ , SO ₂ , and NH ₃ in the Surface Tiled Aerosol and Gaseous Exchange (STAGE) option in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model version 5.3.2 against field-scale, in situ and satellite observations
    Jesse O. Bash, John T. Walker, Zhiyong Wu +10
    Geoscientific Model DevelopmentPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossrefPMC
  4. Quantifying turbulent kinetic energy in the middle atmosphere from wind and temperature observations: a method validated against a global model
    Nikita Goswami, Irina Strelnikova, Robin Wing +5
    EGUspherePreprintCC BY 4.0General earth scienceEGUsphere
  5. Improvement of a Neural Network Convection Scheme by Including Triggering and Evaluation in Present and Future Climates
    Hugo Germain, Blanka Balogh, Olivier Geoffroy +1
    Artificial Intelligence for the Earth SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOceanography & cryosphereHAL
BibTeX
@article{saeedi2026processbased,
  title = {{Process-based upgrades to the WRF multi-layer green-roof scheme (WRF-MLGR v2.0) and evaluation against field observations}},
  author = {Alireza Saeedi and Maria Martinez Mendoza and Eric Scott Krayenhoff and James Voogt and Hang Yin and Andrea Zonato and Sylvie Leroyer and Claudia Wagner-Riddle},
  journal = {Geoscientific Model Development},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5194/gmd-19-10103-2026},
  url = {https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/10103/2026/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Process-based upgrades to the WRF multi-layer green-roof scheme (WRF-MLGR v2.0) and evaluation against field observations
AU  - Alireza Saeedi
AU  - Maria Martinez Mendoza
AU  - Eric Scott Krayenhoff
AU  - James Voogt
AU  - Hang Yin
AU  - Andrea Zonato
AU  - Sylvie Leroyer
AU  - Claudia Wagner-Riddle
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Geoscientific Model Development
DO  - 10.5194/gmd-19-10103-2026
UR  - https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/10103/2026/
AB  - Green roofs can moderate urban heat by increasing latent heat flux and reducing sensible heat flux. However, capturing these effects in models depends on accurate representation of key green-roof processes, including substrate heat and moisture transport, soil-vegetation-atmosphere energy and moisture exchanges, interactions with the underlying roof, and drainage. Here we introduce targeted, process-based updates to the green-roof scheme (hereafter, MLGR) within the multi-layer urban canopy model (BEP-BEM) in the WRF mesoscale model to address key limitations in the original formulation. The updates include a non-linear dependence of soil thermal conductivity on moisture, vegetation-modulated surface thermal conductivity, explicit soil-surface evaporation, multi-layer root water uptake for transpiration, and canopy interception with evaporation and dew formation. We evaluate the original and modified MLGR schemes using hourly observations from an extensive sedum roof in London, Canada, for “summer” (1 July–31 August 2014) and “fall” (1 September–31 October 2014) periods. We also analyze 11–18 October 2025, when green roof modules were placed directly on the roof deck – which corresponds to the model's lower boundary assumption. Following implementation of the process-based improvements, model–measurement agreement for the conductive heat flux is markedly improved: RMSE is reduced from 105.9 to 24.0 W m ⁻² in summer and from 94.2 to 24.0 W m ⁻² in fall and the model produces more realistic overall green roof energy partitioning. The modified model better captures post-rain increases in latent heat flux ( Q E ) and improves the timing and magnitude of daytime turbulent latent and sensible heat flux peaks ( Q E and Q H ). Drainage is reduced relative to the original scheme; however, it remains slightly underestimated during summer and slightly overestimated during fall, and biases persist in surface temperature (warm during the day and cool at night) and in the magnitude and variability of Q E . Overall, the revised MLGR physics improves surface-flux realism, and future development should focus on developing a more realistic vegetation canopy submodule.
SN  - 1991-9603
SN  - 1991-959X
ER  -