Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Dimensions of a ring and its formal power series ring

Abstract

Understanding the relation between dim R and dim R[[x]] is a classical problem in commutative algebra. For a Noetherian ring R, one has dim R[[x]]=dim R+1, but the general case is considerably more delicate. In 1973, Arnold proved that finite power-series dimension requires the strong finite type (SFT) condition, whereas, in 2002, Coykendall constructed a one-dimensional SFT domain whose power series ring has infinite dimension. The question of Coykendall and Gilmer whether dim R[[x]]<∞ forces dim R[[x]]≤2dim R+1 was answered negatively by Kang and Park in 2009. In this paper, we prove that, as R ranges over the nonzero commutative rings with identity, the finite pairs (dim R,dim R[[x]]) are exactly (0,1) and the pairs (n,m) with 1≤ n<m.

Related

  1. Finitistic dimensions of formal power series rings
    Xiaolei Zhang, Weiheng Xia
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. Substitution groups of formal power series
    Agustín D'Alessandro, Fernando Szechtman
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. A polynomial method over formal power series
    Artur Akhiiarov, Mikhail Koshelev, Andrey Kupavskii +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. Spherical Completeness, Coherence, and GCD Properties of Formal Power Series and Witt Vector Rings
    Yiding Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. The Hilbert Basis Theorem for Non-Associative Skew Power Series Rings and Non-Associative Skew Laurent Series Rings over a Non-Associative Coefficient Ring
    Darwin P. Mangubat, Jocelyn P. Vilela, Johan Richter
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{tran2026dimensions,
  title = {{Dimensions of a ring and its formal power series ring}},
  author = {Viet-Hoang Tran and Thieu N. Vo and Tan M. Nguyen},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.17854},
  eprint = {2609.17854},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17854},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Dimensions of a ring and its formal power series ring
AU  - Viet-Hoang Tran
AU  - Thieu N. Vo
AU  - Tan M. Nguyen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.17854
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17854
AB  - Understanding the relation between dim R and dim R[[x]] is a classical problem in commutative algebra. For a Noetherian ring R, one has dim R[[x]]=dim R+1, but the general case is considerably more delicate. In 1973, Arnold proved that finite power-series dimension requires the strong finite type (SFT) condition, whereas, in 2002, Coykendall constructed a one-dimensional SFT domain whose power series ring has infinite dimension. The question of Coykendall and Gilmer whether dim R[[x]]<∞ forces dim R[[x]]≤2dim R+1 was answered negatively by Kang and Park in 2009. In this paper, we prove that, as R ranges over the nonzero commutative rings with identity, the finite pairs (dim R,dim R[[x]]) are exactly (0,1) and the pairs (n,m) with 1≤ n<m.
ER  -