Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

When, Why, and How CMB Compression Fails

Abstract

We test when compressed CMB likelihoods can be reliably used to constrain new physics beyond ΛCDM, formulating concrete criteria for \textit{when}, \textit{why}, and \textit{how} CMB compression fails. We derive our conclusions by exploring a broad set of models that modify different aspects of the cosmological evolution, including late-time dark-energy dynamics, non-standard late-time dark-matter evolution through interactions or decay, and dark-matter models with persistently non-standard redshift evolution. For each case, we compare the results obtained from data combinations based on the full Planck-CMB likelihood with their counterparts based on a compressed CMB likelihood calibrated in ΛCDM. We find that the compression remains accurate for late-time dark-energy extensions that preserve the dark-matter background evolution and do not introduce significant additional perturbative effects. By contrast, modifying the dark-matter evolution breaks the mapping between the present-day matter density and the matter density at the epochs relevant to the CMB, causing the compressed constraints to fail even when the modification acts exclusively at late times. In these cases, the compressed likelihood can drastically alter the geometry of the multidimensional posterior distributions, shifting their centers, producing strongly anisotropic deformations, reordering principal modes, and generating genuine mixing and rotation of their eigendirections. These multidimensional distortions propagate into substantially incorrect marginalized constraints on cosmological parameters, with differences between the full and compressed analyses reaching nearly an order of magnitude in some of the cases studied here.

Related

  1. Radiation pressure powers quasar broad absorption line winds but fails to drive galaxy feedback
    Braden Seefeldt-Gail, Lluís Mas-Ribas, Norman Murray
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  2. Options for Compression of radio interferometry data: lossy compression of visibilities and lossless compression of uv-visibility grids for the MHONGOOSE survey
    Richard Dodson, Jonghwan Rhee, W. J. G. de Blok +6
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  3. Two bits about lossy compression: On the limits of compression in cosmology
    Hurum Maksora Tohfa, Matthew McQuinn
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  4. Dense Dump Codec: Error-Controlled, Random-Access Compression of GRMHD Time Series for Slow-Light Radiative Transfer
    Zelin Zhang, Zhenyu Zhang, Bin Chen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. AI-based Compression of SDO/AIA for Solar Coronal Features
    Jaewon Lee, Yong-Jae Moon, Seong-Gyeong Jeon +2
    The Astrophysical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsIOP/AASCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{pedrotti2026when,
  title = {{When, Why, and How CMB Compression Fails}},
  author = {Davide Pedrotti and William Giarè and Hanyu Cheng and Eleonora Di Valentino},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.08728},
  eprint = {2610.08728},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08728},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - When, Why, and How CMB Compression Fails
AU  - Davide Pedrotti
AU  - William Giarè
AU  - Hanyu Cheng
AU  - Eleonora Di Valentino
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.08728
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08728
AB  - We test when compressed CMB likelihoods can be reliably used to constrain new physics beyond ΛCDM, formulating concrete criteria for \textit{when}, \textit{why}, and \textit{how} CMB compression fails. We derive our conclusions by exploring a broad set of models that modify different aspects of the cosmological evolution, including late-time dark-energy dynamics, non-standard late-time dark-matter evolution through interactions or decay, and dark-matter models with persistently non-standard redshift evolution. For each case, we compare the results obtained from data combinations based on the full Planck-CMB likelihood with their counterparts based on a compressed CMB likelihood calibrated in ΛCDM. We find that the compression remains accurate for late-time dark-energy extensions that preserve the dark-matter background evolution and do not introduce significant additional perturbative effects. By contrast, modifying the dark-matter evolution breaks the mapping between the present-day matter density and the matter density at the epochs relevant to the CMB, causing the compressed constraints to fail even when the modification acts exclusively at late times. In these cases, the compressed likelihood can drastically alter the geometry of the multidimensional posterior distributions, shifting their centers, producing strongly anisotropic deformations, reordering principal modes, and generating genuine mixing and rotation of their eigendirections. These multidimensional distortions propagate into substantially incorrect marginalized constraints on cosmological parameters, with differences between the full and compressed analyses reaching nearly an order of magnitude in some of the cases studied here.
ER  -