Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYHealth Services Insights

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Intravenous Fluid Shortages in Emergency Department Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study

Abstract

Background Intravenous (IV) saline is critical for emergency department (ED) care, supporting resuscitation, rehydration, and electrolyte correction. National IV fluid shortages, including the shortage following Hurricane Helene in September 2024, may disrupt timely care, yet large-scale evidence on associated clinical outcomes is limited. Methods In this retrospective observational cohort study using the TriNetX global federated electronic health record network, adult ED patients aged 18-65 years presenting during a nationwide IV fluid shortage (October 2024-May 2025) were compared with those presenting during a prior period of adequate supply. Cohorts were propensity score matched on demographics and comorbidities. Time-to-event outcomes within 7 days were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Results After matching, 2,767,318 patients were included in each cohort. Compared with the non-shortage period, ED visits during the shortage were associated with small but consistent increases in rates of sepsis (HR 1.066), gastroenteritis (HR 1.151), acute kidney failure (HR 1.006), and hyponatremia (HR 1.074). Fluid administration was reduced (HR 0.869), consistent with expectations during the shortage period. Hospitalization (HR 1.06) was more frequent, while mortality did not differ. Conclusion Nationwide IV fluid shortages were associated with mild increases in acute complications and healthcare utilization among ED patients without increased short-term mortality. These findings underscore the need for preparedness strategies to mitigate the clinical impact of future IV fluid supply disruptions. Effect sizes were modest, and while statistically significant, they likely represent small individual level clinical differences. Given the large number of ED encounters affected, these patterns may reflect broader health-system strain during the nationwide shortage.

Related

  1. Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Training on Central Line Placement in the Emergency Department.
    Matthew Berniard, Richard Slama, Gavin Rogers +3
    The western journal of emergency medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Long-Term Prognosis of Non-Ischaemic Myocardial Injury in the Emergency Department: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Study
    Isabel Jurado-Meléndez, Carla Durà-Roldán, Alfredo Bardají +5
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cardiovascular medicineCrossref
  3. Development and external validation of a risk prediction model for early peripheral intravenous catheter failure in outpatients and emergency department patients receiving consecutive infusion therapy.
    Jingjue Mao, Caifeng Xu, Yuxin Yao +7
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing nebulized fentanyl and intravenous morphine for acute pain management in the emergency department.
    Pitchapar Preungprasob, Rapeeporn Rojsaengroeng, Chirakit Hengrasmee +2
    BMC emergency medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCDOAJ
  5. Emergency Department Utilization After 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Versus Usual Care for Refractory Occipital Neuralgia: A Prospective Propensity-Matched Cohort, Difference-in-Differences Analysis
    C. W. Harris, E. T. Nguyen, S. M. Limas +3
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{patel2026clinical,
  title = {{Clinical Outcomes Associated With Intravenous Fluid Shortages in Emergency Department Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study}},
  author = {Milan Patel BS and Ahmed M. Afifi MD and Gabriel G. Bonassi BS and Ali A. Fakih BS and Mohamad Moussa MD and Stephen Grider DO, FACEP, FACOEP},
  journal = {Health Services Insights},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1177/11786329261502448},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329261502448},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical Outcomes Associated With Intravenous Fluid Shortages in Emergency Department Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study
AU  - Milan Patel BS
AU  - Ahmed M. Afifi MD
AU  - Gabriel G. Bonassi BS
AU  - Ali A. Fakih BS
AU  - Mohamad Moussa MD
AU  - Stephen Grider DO, FACEP, FACOEP
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
JO  - Health Services Insights
DO  - 10.1177/11786329261502448
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329261502448
AB  - Background Intravenous (IV) saline is critical for emergency department (ED) care, supporting resuscitation, rehydration, and electrolyte correction. National IV fluid shortages, including the shortage following Hurricane Helene in September 2024, may disrupt timely care, yet large-scale evidence on associated clinical outcomes is limited. Methods In this retrospective observational cohort study using the TriNetX global federated electronic health record network, adult ED patients aged 18-65 years presenting during a nationwide IV fluid shortage (October 2024-May 2025) were compared with those presenting during a prior period of adequate supply. Cohorts were propensity score matched on demographics and comorbidities. Time-to-event outcomes within 7 days were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Results After matching, 2,767,318 patients were included in each cohort. Compared with the non-shortage period, ED visits during the shortage were associated with small but consistent increases in rates of sepsis (HR 1.066), gastroenteritis (HR 1.151), acute kidney failure (HR 1.006), and hyponatremia (HR 1.074). Fluid administration was reduced (HR 0.869), consistent with expectations during the shortage period. Hospitalization (HR 1.06) was more frequent, while mortality did not differ. Conclusion Nationwide IV fluid shortages were associated with mild increases in acute complications and healthcare utilization among ED patients without increased short-term mortality. These findings underscore the need for preparedness strategies to mitigate the clinical impact of future IV fluid supply disruptions. Effect sizes were modest, and while statistically significant, they likely represent small individual level clinical differences. Given the large number of ED encounters affected, these patterns may reflect broader health-system strain during the nationwide shortage.
SN  - 1178-6329
ER  -