Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDSustainable Cities and Society: Advances

Digital Twins for Building Sustainability: A Life Cycle-Oriented Critical Review

Abstract

Digital Twin (DT) technology is increasingly positioned as a transformative tool for advancing sustainability in the Built Environment (BE). However, its lifecycle-wide applications, implementation maturity, and alignment with sustainability standards remain insufficiently understood. This study presents a PRISMA-guided systematic review of the applications of DTs for building sustainability. A total of 109 peer-reviewed articles retrieved from the Web of Science database were analyzed using content analysis. The literature was classified into five thematic areas: the evolution of Building Information Modelling (BIM) into DT; DT concepts and applications; DT components; DT maturity levels; and sustainability dimensions enabled by DTs, including energy, carbon, indoor environmental quality (IEQ), circular economy (CE), and social sustainability. An implementation-oriented subset was further examined to assess the lifecycle coverage, building types, sustainability focus, and DT maturity. The findings show that most DT applications are concentrated in the operation and maintenance (O&M) phase, primarily targeting energy efficiency, operational carbon reduction, predictive maintenance, and IEQ monitoring. In contrast, design, construction, renovation, and end-of-life applications remain underdeveloped, despite their importance for lifecycle sustainability. The review also reveals uneven maturity across sustainability dimensions, with more advanced implementations in operational energy and IEQ applications, while embodied carbon, whole-life carbon, circularity, accessibility, equity, and broader social sustainability indicators remain insufficiently explored. Furthermore, DT applications are weakly aligned with established sustainability standards, certifications, and regulatory frameworks. These findings highlight the need for lifecycle-integrated, standards-aligned, and human-centered DT frameworks capable of connecting technical, environmental, and social performance indicators to support sustainable building decision making.

Related

  1. Integrated Urban Climate Resilience and Sustainability Assessment System for Urban Regeneration and Building Renovation
    Jeongmin Kim, Birte Meller, Junhee Woo +2
    LandPeer-reviewedCC BY5 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionOpenAlex
  2. Assessing urban digital sustainability through composite indicators of digital use intensity and e-waste pressure in India
    Apurva Goel, Snehal Masurkar, Girish R. Pathade
    Discover SustainabilityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  3. IrriTwin: Integrating reinforcement learning with soil water and crop models toward digital-twin-oriented irrigation scheduling
    Menghua Xu, Xiujuan Wang, Mengzhen Kang +4
    Journal of HydrologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text2 citedHydrology & soilsHAL
  4. Nature identification Applications: navigating between the reduction of the living and their ecological potential. A critical and diplomatic analysis for a life-centered Digital Design
    Inès Garmon
    Interfaces numériquesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Fe-AC nanocomposites derived from agro-waste biosorbents: a systematic review of synthesis routes, adsorption mechanisms, regeneration, and environmental sustainability.
    Bijoylakshmi Boruah, Pratap Kumar Swain, Manash Ranjan Das
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textHydrology & soilsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{aiasrah2026digital,
  title = {{Digital Twins for Building Sustainability: A Life Cycle-Oriented Critical Review}},
  author = {Rawan Aiasrah and Rania Wehbi and Vedrana Ikalovic and Ammar Aljer and Marwan Sadek},
  journal = {Sustainable Cities and Society: Advances},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.scsadv.2026.100091},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05794969v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Digital Twins for Building Sustainability: A Life Cycle-Oriented Critical Review
AU  - Rawan Aiasrah
AU  - Rania Wehbi
AU  - Vedrana Ikalovic
AU  - Ammar Aljer
AU  - Marwan Sadek
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Sustainable Cities and Society: Advances
DO  - 10.1016/j.scsadv.2026.100091
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05794969v1
AB  - Digital Twin (DT) technology is increasingly positioned as a transformative tool for advancing sustainability in the Built Environment (BE). However, its lifecycle-wide applications, implementation maturity, and alignment with sustainability standards remain insufficiently understood. This study presents a PRISMA-guided systematic review of the applications of DTs for building sustainability. A total of 109 peer-reviewed articles retrieved from the Web of Science database were analyzed using content analysis. The literature was classified into five thematic areas: the evolution of Building Information Modelling (BIM) into DT; DT concepts and applications; DT components; DT maturity levels; and sustainability dimensions enabled by DTs, including energy, carbon, indoor environmental quality (IEQ), circular economy (CE), and social sustainability. An implementation-oriented subset was further examined to assess the lifecycle coverage, building types, sustainability focus, and DT maturity. The findings show that most DT applications are concentrated in the operation and maintenance (O&M) phase, primarily targeting energy efficiency, operational carbon reduction, predictive maintenance, and IEQ monitoring. In contrast, design, construction, renovation, and end-of-life applications remain underdeveloped, despite their importance for lifecycle sustainability. The review also reveals uneven maturity across sustainability dimensions, with more advanced implementations in operational energy and IEQ applications, while embodied carbon, whole-life carbon, circularity, accessibility, equity, and broader social sustainability indicators remain insufficiently explored. Furthermore, DT applications are weakly aligned with established sustainability standards, certifications, and regulatory frameworks. These findings highlight the need for lifecycle-integrated, standards-aligned, and human-centered DT frameworks capable of connecting technical, environmental, and social performance indicators to support sustainable building decision making.
SN  - 3051-052X
SN  - 3051-052X
ER  -