Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS Global Public Health
Who sifts? Knowledge as a public good in the age of AI
- 1Global 50/50, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
- 2Monash University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abstract
The institutions that turned information into evidence for public policy decisions are being defunded and discredited just as generative AI floods them with fluent, unsourced text. Sifting what is known from what is claimed is now a core responsibility for public health institutions.
Related
- Beyond deficit and coexistence: Modeling the knowledge–conspiracy–mistrust configuration in public understanding of science
- Rural iowa adolescents' use, knowledge and attitudes regarding UTVs on public roads.
- To be or not to appear tired: When the « good patient » takes the stage
- People are good at stewardship
- Establishment of plant lines cured of vertically transmitted 'good' viruses: The effects on plant growth and seed characteristics
BibTeX
@article{buse2026sifts,
title = {{Who sifts? Knowledge as a public good in the age of AI}},
author = {Kent Buse and Sarah Hawkes},
journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0007381},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007381},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Who sifts? Knowledge as a public good in the age of AI
AU - Kent Buse
AU - Sarah Hawkes
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - PLOS Global Public Health
DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007381
UR - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007381
AB - The institutions that turned information into evidence for public policy decisions are being defunded and discredited just as generative AI floods them with fluent, unsourced text. Sifting what is known from what is claimed is now a core responsibility for public health institutions.
SN - 2767-3375
ER -