Thirty years after “The Naturalists Are Dying Off”: Regrounding Conservation Biology in a predictive era
Abstract
Thirty years after Reed Noss warned that naturalists were dying off, conservation biology has entered an era of unprecedented analytical capacity, driven by global biodiversity databases, remote sensing, and artificial intelligence. This transformation has coincided with declining visibility and support for field-based natural history and taxonomy. The resulting losses extend beyond primary biodiversity observations. Declining taxonomic expertise can compromise species identification and data reliability, while reduced firsthand engagement with nature may constrain observation-driven discoveries and the generation of novel ecological hypotheses. The erosion of organismal and place-based knowledge may also weaken our ability to interpret ecological changes and evaluate predictive models, particularly as climate change, biological invasions, and novel ecosystems alter historical ecological relationships. Addressing these challenges requires sustained investment in field observations, specimen collections, and taxonomic expertise, alongside stronger integration of natural-history knowledge into quantitative and AI-enabled research. Universities, funding agencies, and journals should recognize and support the empirical foundations of conservation science through interdisciplinary training, transparent data provenance, and greater recognition of long-term ecological research.
Related
- Thirty years of fluconazole therapy selects an azole-resistant Candida albicans isolate with a pre-adapted physiological, metabolic and structural state
- Inferring the perennial biomass and phytoremediation potential of thirty-one woody species from large phytomanagement field trials
- Testing Thirty Years of Hypotheses: Ancient Trout-Salmon Introgression and Limited Pre-Colonial Gene Flow Between Rainbow and Cutthroat Trout Shaped Pacific Salmonid Evolution
- Cell biology of bacterial sensory modules
- Ten simple rules for responsible use of AI and LLMs in computational biology
BibTeX
@misc{sun2026thirty,
title = {{Thirty years after “The Naturalists Are Dying Off”: Regrounding Conservation Biology in a predictive era}},
author = {Jingrui Sun},
howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.32942/x2698m},
url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15968/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Thirty years after “The Naturalists Are Dying Off”: Regrounding Conservation Biology in a predictive era
AU - Jingrui Sun
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/06
PB - EcoEvoRxiv
DO - 10.32942/x2698m
UR - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15968/
AB - Thirty years after Reed Noss warned that naturalists were dying off, conservation biology has entered an era of unprecedented analytical capacity, driven by global biodiversity databases, remote sensing, and artificial intelligence. This transformation has coincided with declining visibility and support for field-based natural history and taxonomy. The resulting losses extend beyond primary biodiversity observations. Declining taxonomic expertise can compromise species identification and data reliability, while reduced firsthand engagement with nature may constrain observation-driven discoveries and the generation of novel ecological hypotheses. The erosion of organismal and place-based knowledge may also weaken our ability to interpret ecological changes and evaluate predictive models, particularly as climate change, biological invasions, and novel ecosystems alter historical ecological relationships. Addressing these challenges requires sustained investment in field observations, specimen collections, and taxonomic expertise, alongside stronger integration of natural-history knowledge into quantitative and AI-enabled research. Universities, funding agencies, and journals should recognize and support the empirical foundations of conservation science through interdisciplinary training, transparent data provenance, and greater recognition of long-term ecological research.
ER -