Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Resuscitation Plus

Incidence of traumatic injuries sustained following cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a single-centre retrospective cohort study

5 affiliations
  1. 1University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  3. 3Greenlight Institute for Emergency Research, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  4. 4Department of Intensive Care Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  5. 5Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Background: Chest compressions form the basis of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Recently, mechanical CPR (MCPR) devices have been introduced, particularly in the prehospital environment, avoiding the need for clinicians to perform conventional manual CPR (CCPR). At our institution, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is available for select OHCA patients in refractory arrest (ECPR). Given ECPR patients typically undergo prolonged chest compressions, there may be a higher likelihood of injury; however, evidence directly comparing ECPR and CCPR injury rates is lacking. This study aimed to investigate incidence and type of traumatic injuries following CPR and whether a difference between ECPR and CCPR patients exists.

Results: 313 OHCA were identified between 2021–2024, with 136 meeting criteria. Mean CPR duration was 24 ± 16 min, and 37 patients (27%) received MCPR. Thirteen patients had ECPR with mean time from cardiac arrest to establishment of ECMO blood flow being 63 ± 18 min, of which 11 (85%) received MCPR. Injuries occurred in 58 patients (43%), with 23 (16.9%) sustaining clinically significant injuries. Rates of mortality were higher for the injured patients compared to the non-injured patients (41 [70%] vs 33 [43%] respectively, p = ≤0.05). On multiple variable logistic regression analysis CPR > 20 min, not ECPR or MCPR, was significantly associated with traumatic injury (OR 2.45, CI 1.15, 5.23, p = ≤0.05).

Conclusion: CPR-related injuries are common. CPR >20 min, not ECPR or MCPR, is associated with higher rate of injury. CT imaging in this cohort could be considered to identify these injuries.

Related

  1. Efficacy and safety of mechanical chest compression compared with manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a systematic review of the literature
    Sara Rizzo, Domitilla Nistri, Mauro Carmine Martucci +3
    Dissertation NursingPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Non-Traumatic Subperiosteal Orbital Hematoma After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Case Report.
    Yong Yuin Chong, Jun Fai Yap, Sylves Patrick +1
    International medical case reports journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  3. Commentary: Incidence and independent risk factors for postoperative delirium in ICU patients after cardiopulmonary bypass cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study
    Antonio Salsano, Francesco Santini
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cardiovascular medicineCrossref
  4. Prognostic Impact of Transient Return of Spontaneous Circulation According to Low-Flow Time in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Nationwide Cohort Study
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Healthcare providers’ confidence, satisfaction, and perceived preparedness following a multicomponent simulation-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program in Gaza
    Madleen Jawad Sobhe Abu Aser, Sharif Jamal Salha, Hasan Husam Ibrahim Al-Balawi
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{shyu2026incidence,
  title = {{Incidence of traumatic injuries sustained following cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a single-centre retrospective cohort study}},
  author = {Clay Shyu and Saartje Berendsen Russell and Ruaidhri Carey and Elliott Worku and Timothy J. Southwood and Richard Totaro and Mark Dennis and Michael Dinh and Matthew Oliver},
  journal = {Resuscitation Plus},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101523},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101523},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Incidence of traumatic injuries sustained following cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a single-centre retrospective cohort study
AU  - Clay Shyu
AU  - Saartje Berendsen Russell
AU  - Ruaidhri Carey
AU  - Elliott Worku
AU  - Timothy J. Southwood
AU  - Richard Totaro
AU  - Mark Dennis
AU  - Michael Dinh
AU  - Matthew Oliver
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Resuscitation Plus
DO  - 10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101523
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101523
AB  - Background: Chest compressions form the basis of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Recently, mechanical CPR (MCPR) devices have been introduced, particularly in the prehospital environment, avoiding the need for clinicians to perform conventional manual CPR (CCPR). At our institution, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is available for select OHCA patients in refractory arrest (ECPR). Given ECPR patients typically undergo prolonged chest compressions, there may be a higher likelihood of injury; however, evidence directly comparing ECPR and CCPR injury rates is lacking. This study aimed to investigate incidence and type of traumatic injuries following CPR and whether a difference between ECPR and CCPR patients exists.  Results: 313 OHCA were identified between 2021–2024, with 136 meeting criteria. Mean CPR duration was 24 ± 16 min, and 37 patients (27%) received MCPR. Thirteen patients had ECPR with mean time from cardiac arrest to establishment of ECMO blood flow being 63 ± 18 min, of which 11 (85%) received MCPR. Injuries occurred in 58 patients (43%), with 23 (16.9%) sustaining clinically significant injuries. Rates of mortality were higher for the injured patients compared to the non-injured patients (41 [70%] vs 33 [43%] respectively, p = ≤0.05). On multiple variable logistic regression analysis CPR > 20 min, not ECPR or MCPR, was significantly associated with traumatic injury (OR 2.45, CI 1.15, 5.23, p = ≤0.05).  Conclusion: CPR-related injuries are common. CPR >20 min, not ECPR or MCPR, is associated with higher rate of injury. CT imaging in this cohort could be considered to identify these injuries.
SN  - 2666-5204
ER  -