Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0HAL

Counting linear extensions of incidence posets of bipartite graphs is #P-complete

Abstract

Dittmer and Pak proved that counting the linear extensions of the incidence poset I G of a graph G is #P-complete, positively resolving a conjecture in [1] about height-2 posets, and specifically solving a problem mentioned in [7] about incidence posets. We show that the problem remains #P-complete when G is restricted to bipartite graphs; consequently, computing exactly the volume of the McCormick relaxation of a bilinear program is #P-hard. As in their work, we compute the count modulo many primes p, gluing the input to a gadget graph whose own count is known modulo p. Here, the gadget must be bipartite, and we evaluate its residue by a block decomposition of the count modulo p together with a binomial cancellation identity; the same method gives a short proof of the residue of the Dittmer-Pak gadget, correcting a small non-fatal calculation error in their paper. In contrast, we show that the count can be computed in polynomial time for graphs of bounded neighborhood diversity, for example complete bipartite graphs, by a recursion over the numbers of remaining vertices of each type.

Related

  1. Maximal Linear Arrangement is NP complete on Bipartite Graphs
    Aparna Das, Jonathan Needleman
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Spectral Turán problems for complete bipartite expansions in linear hypergraphs
    Lusheng Fang, Guorong Gao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Counting quaternion extensions by multi-heights
    Willem Hansen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Counting Nilpotent Galois extensions with prescribed genus number
    Anup B. Dixit, Anwesh Ray
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Negative edge correlation in complete bipartite graphs
    Ying Cao, Houshan Fu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{lee2026counting,
  title = {{Counting linear extensions of incidence posets of bipartite graphs is #P-complete}},
  author = {Jon Lee},
  howpublished = {HAL},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05793069v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Counting linear extensions of incidence posets of bipartite graphs is #P-complete
AU  - Jon Lee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/11
PB  - HAL
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05793069v1
AB  - Dittmer and Pak proved that counting the linear extensions of the incidence poset I G of a graph G is #P-complete, positively resolving a conjecture in [1] about height-2 posets, and specifically solving a problem mentioned in [7] about incidence posets. We show that the problem remains #P-complete when G is restricted to bipartite graphs; consequently, computing exactly the volume of the McCormick relaxation of a bilinear program is #P-hard. As in their work, we compute the count modulo many primes p, gluing the input to a gadget graph whose own count is known modulo p. Here, the gadget must be bipartite, and we evaluate its residue by a block decomposition of the count modulo p together with a binomial cancellation identity; the same method gives a short proof of the residue of the Dittmer-Pak gadget, correcting a small non-fatal calculation error in their paper. In contrast, we show that the count can be computed in polynomial time for graphs of bounded neighborhood diversity, for example complete bipartite graphs, by a recursion over the numbers of remaining vertices of each type.
ER  -