Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDCurrent hypertension reports

Integrating Scalability and Equity into Hypertension Remote Patient Monitoring Program Design.

9 affiliations
  1. 1Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  2. 2Division of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  3. 3Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  4. 4Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  5. 5Northwell Health, Hyde Park, NY, USA.
  6. 6HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.
  7. 7Department of Medicine, Montefiore Einstein and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
  8. 8Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  9. 9Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. [email protected].

Abstract

Purpose of review

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) for hypertension combines home blood pressure (BP) monitoring with electronic transmission of BP readings and clinical support. RPM has the potential to improve BP control and reduce hypertension disparities, but because it depends on devices, connectivity, digital literacy, and sustained engagement, it may also worsen inequities if not intentionally designed. This review examines barriers to equitable RPM implementation and strategies to address them.Recent findings

RPM can improve hypertension control and extend care beyond traditional clinical settings, but its effect on health equity depends on program design. Equity should be treated as a core design principle. Future research should evaluate differential reach, engagement, effectiveness, and sustainability across populations and identify payment models that support equitable implementation at scale. Barriers to equitable RPM implementation occur at patient, clinician, health system, and policy levels. Key challenges include limited access to technology, language barriers, out-of-pocket costs, inadequate cuff sizing, unmet social needs, clinician workload, referral bias, infrastructure limitations, reimbursement variability, and the digital divide. Emerging evidence suggests that equity-focused strategies can improve reach and engagement, including provision of cellular-enabled devices, reduced patient costs, culturally and linguistically tailored support, team-based care, registry-based outreach, and routine monitoring of enrollment and outcomes across demographic groups. High-resource, low-resource, and hybrid RPM models each offer distinct advantages and tradeoffs in balancing scalability, sustainability, and equity.

Related

  1. Blood Pressure Variability in Neurodegenerative Disease: Evidence From a Large-Scale Remote Patient Monitoring Program.
    Wesley Smith, Joseph F Signorile, Azizi A Seixas +3
    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  2. A Two-Tier Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control Program Integrating K-Means Department Stratification and Inter-Instrument Ratios Improves Detection of Small Systematic Errors in Creatinine Testing.
    Xuemei Wei, Ziqing Jiang, Jingzhu Nan +5
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
  3. Effectiveness of a pharmacy-led personalised intervention program aimed at improving adherence to oral diabetes and/or hypertension medication in people with type 2 diabetes
    M. Langendoen-Gort, S. Remmelzwaal, F. Rutters +6
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  4. Identifying a Cardio‐Hepatic Phenotype by Integrating the Albumin‐Bilirubin Score Into Risk Assessment in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
    Hacer Ceren Tokgoz, Barkin Kultursay, Seda Tanyeri +13
    Pulmonary circulationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Prenatal Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring and Detection of Chronic Hypertension
    O&G openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{kronish2026integrating,
  title = {{Integrating Scalability and Equity into Hypertension Remote Patient Monitoring Program Design.}},
  author = {Ian M Kronish and Kelsey B Bryant and Yvonne Commodore-Mensah and Jacqueline R Halladay and Eun Ji Kim and Karen L Margolis and Sharon Rikin and Harry West and Jennifer L Cluett},
  journal = {Current hypertension reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s11906-026-01393-4},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42911359},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Integrating Scalability and Equity into Hypertension Remote Patient Monitoring Program Design.
AU  - Ian M Kronish
AU  - Kelsey B Bryant
AU  - Yvonne Commodore-Mensah
AU  - Jacqueline R Halladay
AU  - Eun Ji Kim
AU  - Karen L Margolis
AU  - Sharon Rikin
AU  - Harry West
AU  - Jennifer L Cluett
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Current hypertension reports
DO  - 10.1007/s11906-026-01393-4
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42911359
AB  - Purpose of review  Remote patient monitoring (RPM) for hypertension combines home blood pressure (BP) monitoring with electronic transmission of BP readings and clinical support. RPM has the potential to improve BP control and reduce hypertension disparities, but because it depends on devices, connectivity, digital literacy, and sustained engagement, it may also worsen inequities if not intentionally designed. This review examines barriers to equitable RPM implementation and strategies to address them.Recent findings  RPM can improve hypertension control and extend care beyond traditional clinical settings, but its effect on health equity depends on program design. Equity should be treated as a core design principle. Future research should evaluate differential reach, engagement, effectiveness, and sustainability across populations and identify payment models that support equitable implementation at scale. Barriers to equitable RPM implementation occur at patient, clinician, health system, and policy levels. Key challenges include limited access to technology, language barriers, out-of-pocket costs, inadequate cuff sizing, unmet social needs, clinician workload, referral bias, infrastructure limitations, reimbursement variability, and the digital divide. Emerging evidence suggests that equity-focused strategies can improve reach and engagement, including provision of cellular-enabled devices, reduced patient costs, culturally and linguistically tailored support, team-based care, registry-based outreach, and routine monitoring of enrollment and outcomes across demographic groups. High-resource, low-resource, and hybrid RPM models each offer distinct advantages and tradeoffs in balancing scalability, sustainability, and equity.
SN  - 1522-6417
SN  - 1534-3111
ER  -