Day of Arrival as a Determinant of Endoscopy Timing in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Natural-Experiment Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Length of Stay
- 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, 14030 Bolu, Türkiye
- 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Bolu İzzet Baysal Training and Research Hospital, 14030 Bolu, Türkiye
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Guidelines recommend endoscopy within 24 h in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, but observational studies are confounded by indication. We used the weekday endoscopy schedule of our centre as a natural experiment. Methods: We studied a retrospective cohort of adults undergoing endoscopy for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding at one tertiary emergency department from 2019 to 2025. Timing was urgent (<12 h), early (12 to 24 h) or elective (>24 h); the primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Friday or Saturday arrival served as an instrument for delay, and crude, multivariable, propensity-based and instrumental-variable estimates were compared. Results: Among 413 episodes in 387 patients, median time to endoscopy was 22.1 h, with 54.5% within 24 h. The groups did not differ on 24 recorded baseline variables or six risk scores. Thirty-day mortality was 5.3% (22 deaths), with no detectable difference by timing (4.2%, 3.9%, and 6.9%; p = 0.420; adjusted odds ratio, elective versus early: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.50 to 4.03). Rebleeding, repeat endoscopy, intensive care admission and a composite outcome were unrelated. Total stay was longer with delay (incidence rate ratio: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.73), while stay from endoscopy onward was not (1.05, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.38), and each day of waiting added 1.03 days of admission (95% CI: 0.60 to 1.46). Friday or Saturday arrival raised the elective proportion from 33.7% to 87.8% without altering the measured severity. Conclusions: Delay beyond 24 h was associated with no detectable difference in outcomes, although the 22 deaths left a moderate effect possible. The additional bed-days equalled the wait itself, which arose after gastroenterology consultation.
Related
- Tranexamic acid use and progression to clinically important bleeding in critically ill patients with non-clinically important non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study
- Comparative performance of pre- and post-endoscopic risk scores for outcome prediction in endoscopy-confirmed upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department : A retrospective single-center study
- Concordancia diagnóstica entre la cápsula endoscópica y la enteroscopía de doble balón en la hemorragia digestiva de intestino medio en un hospital de referencia en Perú Diagnostic Agreement Between Capsule Endoscopy and Double-Balloon Enteroscopy in Mid-Gut Gastrointestinal Bleeding at a Referral Hospital in Peru
- EUS-guided vascular therapy: an effective approach for refractory and per-endoscopic non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding
- Risk factors for recurrent variceal bleeding after TIPS in cirrhotic patients with esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage: a single-center retrospective study
BibTeX
@article{bayram2026arrival,
title = {{Day of Arrival as a Determinant of Endoscopy Timing in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Natural-Experiment Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Length of Stay}},
author = {Lokman Bayram and Faruk Danış},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15207820},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7820},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Day of Arrival as a Determinant of Endoscopy Timing in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Natural-Experiment Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Length of Stay
AU - Lokman Bayram
AU - Faruk Danış
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15207820
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7820
AB - Background/Objectives: Guidelines recommend endoscopy within 24 h in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, but observational studies are confounded by indication. We used the weekday endoscopy schedule of our centre as a natural experiment. Methods: We studied a retrospective cohort of adults undergoing endoscopy for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding at one tertiary emergency department from 2019 to 2025. Timing was urgent (<12 h), early (12 to 24 h) or elective (>24 h); the primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Friday or Saturday arrival served as an instrument for delay, and crude, multivariable, propensity-based and instrumental-variable estimates were compared. Results: Among 413 episodes in 387 patients, median time to endoscopy was 22.1 h, with 54.5% within 24 h. The groups did not differ on 24 recorded baseline variables or six risk scores. Thirty-day mortality was 5.3% (22 deaths), with no detectable difference by timing (4.2%, 3.9%, and 6.9%; p = 0.420; adjusted odds ratio, elective versus early: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.50 to 4.03). Rebleeding, repeat endoscopy, intensive care admission and a composite outcome were unrelated. Total stay was longer with delay (incidence rate ratio: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.73), while stay from endoscopy onward was not (1.05, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.38), and each day of waiting added 1.03 days of admission (95% CI: 0.60 to 1.46). Friday or Saturday arrival raised the elective proportion from 33.7% to 87.8% without altering the measured severity. Conclusions: Delay beyond 24 h was associated with no detectable difference in outcomes, although the 22 deaths left a moderate effect possible. The additional bed-days equalled the wait itself, which arose after gastroenterology consultation.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -