Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Public Health

A qualitative framing analysis of the role of parents and families in English obesity policy documents 2010–2020

Abstract

Background: Childhood obesity is a key policy challenge facing governments globally. Three decades of policy initiatives in England have been largely unsuccessful in reducing prevalence and inequalities in childhood obesity. Parents and families are often portrayed as responsible for children’s weight in the media. Less is known about their portrayal in policy documents. Understanding how parents and families are framed in policy documents can provide important insights into the factors shaping policy decisions and could thus support the development of more effective policies. This study extends prior work by shifting attention from media and intervention framing to the representation of parents and families within national policy texts.

Methods: A qualitative framing analysis was conducted on how parents and families are framed in six seminal English childhood obesity policy documents published 2010–2020. Reflexive thematic analysis and framing theory were applied to identify themes.

Results: Four themes were identified: (1) Parents and families are decision-makers; (2) Public services should empower parents and families; (3) Assumption of maternal responsibility for the family; and (4) Individual responsibility via the family. There were notable omissions in policies related to parents and childhood obesity, particularly broader societal factors such as financial constraints, contemporary family constellations and food insecurity.

Conclusions: This research emphasizes the importance of both language and framing, and their potential biases in influencing policy approaches concerning parents’ role in childhood obesity. There is a need for re-evaluating commonly used frames that put excessive responsibility on parents to provide a healthy lifestyle for their children. Changes in framing in future policy are necessary to provide adequate support for parents and families for their effective involvement in addressing childhood obesity. Future policy should move beyond parent-blaming frames by combining recognition of family agency with practical, equitable support that addresses material, service and environmental constraints.

Related

  1. Investigating the Challenges of One-child Families in Iran From the perspective of Parents: A Qualitative Study
    Mina Iravani, Leila Bozorgian, Parvin Esfandiarinezhad +1
    Journal of Holistic Nursing and MidwiferyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Assessment and implementation of AI-enabled digital health technologies in hospitals: a review and qualitative document analysis of HTA reports and guidance documents.
    Michaela Riegelnegg, Doris Giess, Cornelia Henschke +3
    BMJ digital health & AIPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  3. Parents’ perceptions of high-quality nursing care for children with cancer: a qualitative descriptive study
    Neda Sheikhzakaryaee, Golnaz Azami, Jamal Seidi
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Regulating the drafting fiction: A qualitative content analysis of official guidance and regulator documents on AI scribe adoption and use in healthcare
    Samuel Oluwatobi Atiku
    PLOS Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  5. Parents' Transcultural Attitudes and Knowledge Concerning Human Milk Exchange: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta‐Aggregation
    Julia Will, Vivian Kirchhoff, Julia Lühnen +2
    Maternal & Child NutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{fell2026qualitative,
  title = {{A qualitative framing analysis of the role of parents and families in English obesity policy documents 2010–2020}},
  author = {Lucy A. Fell and Andrea D. Smith and Benjamin R. Hawkins},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-30098-1},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-30098-1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A qualitative framing analysis of the role of parents and families in English obesity policy documents 2010–2020
AU  - Lucy A. Fell
AU  - Andrea D. Smith
AU  - Benjamin R. Hawkins
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/31
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-30098-1
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-30098-1
AB  - Background: Childhood obesity is a key policy challenge facing governments globally. Three decades of policy initiatives in England have been largely unsuccessful in reducing prevalence and inequalities in childhood obesity. Parents and families are often portrayed as responsible for children’s weight in the media. Less is known about their portrayal in policy documents. Understanding how parents and families are framed in policy documents can provide important insights into the factors shaping policy decisions and could thus support the development of more effective policies. This study extends prior work by shifting attention from media and intervention framing to the representation of parents and families within national policy texts.  Methods: A qualitative framing analysis was conducted on how parents and families are framed in six seminal English childhood obesity policy documents published 2010–2020. Reflexive thematic analysis and framing theory were applied to identify themes.  Results: Four themes were identified: (1) Parents and families are decision-makers; (2) Public services should empower parents and families; (3) Assumption of maternal responsibility for the family; and (4) Individual responsibility via the family. There were notable omissions in policies related to parents and childhood obesity, particularly broader societal factors such as financial constraints, contemporary family constellations and food insecurity.  Conclusions: This research emphasizes the importance of both language and framing, and their potential biases in influencing policy approaches concerning parents’ role in childhood obesity. There is a need for re-evaluating commonly used frames that put excessive responsibility on parents to provide a healthy lifestyle for their children. Changes in framing in future policy are necessary to provide adequate support for parents and families for their effective involvement in addressing childhood obesity. Future policy should move beyond parent-blaming frames by combining recognition of family agency with practical, equitable support that addresses material, service and environmental constraints.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -