Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Multi-omic Environmental Monitoring Reveals When Molecular Signals Reflect Living Biology

  1. 1University of Washington

Abstract

Environmental molecular monitoring has transformed biodiversity detection, yet most methods capture only species presence through amplified DNA fragments, missing the biological information encoded in native nucleic acids. Here we show that a single shotgun Oxford Nanopore sequencing library from water can be read through several independent biological lenses, and that each class of molecule (environmental RNA, CpG methylation, and bulk DNA) differs in its environmental persistence, which sets the window over which signal can be trusted. Sampling Pacific salmon spawning runs, we simultaneously recovered environmental RNA indicating fresh biological input, CpG methylation profiles reflecting age demographics, and pathogen signatures reflecting health. Environmental RNA tracked spawning phenology, qPCR corroborated the timing of fresh biological input over the weeks sampled, and methylation-based age inference held only while fresh DNA dominated, a condition we term the 'Freshness Gate.' Because environmental water is not a tissue sample, we detect functional transcripts as evidence of biological input but do not infer differential gene expression, and we read methylation state but do not infer biological age outside the Freshness Gate. Variance partitioning is consistent with biological freshness, rather than technical factors such as fragment length or sequencing depth, structuring environmental methylation, though these comparisons did not reach significance at nine time points. Comparable dynamics were observed in Chinook salmon, with timing offsets following their distinct spawning season. By defining when environmental molecules faithfully encode living biology and when degradation decouples signal from current state, our framework sets practical and theoretical boundaries for multi-omic environmental monitoring.

Related

  1. Environmental Signals That Drive Early Life Innate Lymphoid Cell Development
    Emily N. Kulp, Colleen M. Lau
    European journal of immunologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textImmunologyPMC
  2. CUBE: Multimodal Representation Learning Reveals Biological Structure Across Histomorphology, Spatial Protein Phenotypes, and Transcriptome-Associated Signals
    Z. Ge, H. Cai
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  3. Interpreting environmental signals from Pleistocene fluvial microvertebrates in the Middle Dnipro (Ukraine): Comparing habitat-weighting and bioclimatic-spectra approaches
    Liliia Popova, Alina Mishta, Vadym Yanenko +2
    PaleorXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEvolutionary biologyOSF
  4. Where are the hake going? How age, environmental signals, and shelf habitat shape Pacific Hake (Merluccius productus) summer distribution
    Rebecca Thomas, Julia Clemons, Stéphane Gauthier +7
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEvolutionary biologyEcoEvoRxiv
  5. A novel phylogenetic comparative model reveals strong signals for early high disparity in ichthyosaurs
    R. Ely, F. Machado
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{ip2026multiomic,
  title = {{Multi-omic Environmental Monitoring Reveals When Molecular Signals Reflect Living Biology}},
  author = {Y. C. A. Ip and G. Guri and P. F. P. Brandao-Dias and E. A. Allan and R. P. Kelly},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.04.749360},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.04.749360v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Multi-omic Environmental Monitoring Reveals When Molecular Signals Reflect Living Biology
AU  - Y. C. A. Ip
AU  - G. Guri
AU  - P. F. P. Brandao-Dias
AU  - E. A. Allan
AU  - R. P. Kelly
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/04
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.04.749360
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.04.749360v1
AB  - Environmental molecular monitoring has transformed biodiversity detection, yet most methods capture only species presence through amplified DNA fragments, missing the biological information encoded in native nucleic acids. Here we show that a single shotgun Oxford Nanopore sequencing library from water can be read through several independent biological lenses, and that each class of molecule (environmental RNA, CpG methylation, and bulk DNA) differs in its environmental persistence, which sets the window over which signal can be trusted. Sampling Pacific salmon spawning runs, we simultaneously recovered environmental RNA indicating fresh biological input, CpG methylation profiles reflecting age demographics, and pathogen signatures reflecting health. Environmental RNA tracked spawning phenology, qPCR corroborated the timing of fresh biological input over the weeks sampled, and methylation-based age inference held only while fresh DNA dominated, a condition we term the 'Freshness Gate.' Because environmental water is not a tissue sample, we detect functional transcripts as evidence of biological input but do not infer differential gene expression, and we read methylation state but do not infer biological age outside the Freshness Gate. Variance partitioning is consistent with biological freshness, rather than technical factors such as fragment length or sequencing depth, structuring environmental methylation, though these comparisons did not reach significance at nine time points. Comparable dynamics were observed in Chinook salmon, with timing offsets following their distinct spawning season. By defining when environmental molecules faithfully encode living biology and when degradation decouples signal from current state, our framework sets practical and theoretical boundaries for multi-omic environmental monitoring.
ER  -