Living with the invader: two native deer, two outcomes along a gradient of axis deer invasion
- 1Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay
Abstract
Exotic species can reshape native communities, in the extreme, to local extirpation. Before that, natives may adjust where and when they use the landscape, in ways that allow coexistence and may be the earliest sign of trouble. Distinguishing coexistence built on such adjustment from one built on pre-existing niche differences requires comparing a native where the invader is absent with the same native where it is present, across sites at different invasion stages. Using eight years (2018-2026) of camera-trap data from 103 stations across Uruguay (154,590 camera-nights), we asked how the invasive axis deer (Axis axis) affects the space and time use of two native cervids: the forest-dwelling brown brocket (Subulo gouazoubira) and the grassland-restricted pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus). Activity-overlap, directional-avoidance, hierarchical activity, and two-species occupancy analyses showed sharply divergent dyads. A. axis and S. gouazoubira shared forest yet segregated in space and along the understory stratum the brocket requires and the invader avoids, and shifted their diel activity by context; understory cover fell with A. axis abundance, consistent with habitat modification. For A. axis and O. bezoarticus, segregation was intrinsic, opposite diel niches and habitats, with no support for a detectable shift in pampas deer behavior. The only behavioral signal was asymmetric: the invader, rather than the native, appeared to adjust, though few shared sites warrant caution. The same invader thus drives different mechanisms, but coexistence is provisional: A. axis is still expanding, far from equilibrium, so these shifts read best as early warning signals.
Related
- Genetic Structure Along Temperature Gradient in a Recent Invader Cardamine hirsuta in Eastern Japan
- Engineered living materials suppress uropathogenic E. coli growth and invasion of urothelial cells through sustained probiotic release
- Disentangling the drivers of parasite occurrence in a native and a non-native small mammal across a land-use gradient
- Natural living walls: protective role of native climbing species against invasive plants at forest edges
- Flavonoid-mediated plant-microbiome interactions shape competitive outcomes between native and non-native mangroves
BibTeX
@misc{mol2026living,
title = {{Living with the invader: two native deer, two outcomes along a gradient of axis deer invasion}},
author = {A. Cravino Mol and S. Mirazo and A. Brazeiro and J. A. Martinez Lanfranco},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.21.753347},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.21.753347v1},
note = {CC BY-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Living with the invader: two native deer, two outcomes along a gradient of axis deer invasion
AU - A. Cravino Mol
AU - S. Mirazo
AU - A. Brazeiro
AU - J. A. Martinez Lanfranco
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/21
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.21.753347
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.21.753347v1
AB - Exotic species can reshape native communities, in the extreme, to local extirpation. Before that, natives may adjust where and when they use the landscape, in ways that allow coexistence and may be the earliest sign of trouble. Distinguishing coexistence built on such adjustment from one built on pre-existing niche differences requires comparing a native where the invader is absent with the same native where it is present, across sites at different invasion stages. Using eight years (2018-2026) of camera-trap data from 103 stations across Uruguay (154,590 camera-nights), we asked how the invasive axis deer (Axis axis) affects the space and time use of two native cervids: the forest-dwelling brown brocket (Subulo gouazoubira) and the grassland-restricted pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus). Activity-overlap, directional-avoidance, hierarchical activity, and two-species occupancy analyses showed sharply divergent dyads. A. axis and S. gouazoubira shared forest yet segregated in space and along the understory stratum the brocket requires and the invader avoids, and shifted their diel activity by context; understory cover fell with A. axis abundance, consistent with habitat modification. For A. axis and O. bezoarticus, segregation was intrinsic, opposite diel niches and habitats, with no support for a detectable shift in pampas deer behavior. The only behavioral signal was asymmetric: the invader, rather than the native, appeared to adjust, though few shared sites warrant caution. The same invader thus drives different mechanisms, but coexistence is provisional: A. axis is still expanding, far from equilibrium, so these shifts read best as early warning signals.
ER -