Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Detecting epidemic outbreaks with routine blood tests: A comparison of surveillance methods using COVID-19 simulations and real-world seasonal disease data

  1. 1Research Institute for Systems Biology and Medicine (RISBM)

Abstract

Timely detection of an epidemic outbreak is essential for implementing interventions and limiting the spread of the pathogen. The digitalization of healthcare has led to the availability of up-to-date, large-scale data on routinely tested blood parameters. This data can be used to detect the onset of an epidemic, which is particularly important when a new, previously unknown pathogen emerges for which no testing systems are available. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of various mathematical approaches for detecting an epidemic based on routinely collected blood test results. The evaluation was performed using both simulated and real-world data. First, we developed the BloodCovasim agent-based model, which defines the dependency of C-reactive protein (CRP) on time for each individual based on the course of their disease and simulates blood analysis. Using synthetic data from thousands of BloodCovasim simulations, we determined the characteristics of different methods of epidemic outbreak detection under controlled conditions. Second, we used the same methods but applied them to real-world data on CRP from Russia during a period of increased seasonal infectious diseases (rhinoviruses, adenoviruses, seasonal coronaviruses) associated with the back-to-school effect. Third, we compared the CRP-based detection method with methods based on a set of inflammatory biomarkers obtained from complete blood count (CBC) results. As a result, we found that the applicability of the methods depends on the volume of incoming data. With large amounts of data, they demonstrate similar results in terms of the probability of detecting an outbreak. As the number of tests decreases, detection methods based on basic statistical tests lose accuracy faster than those based on moving averages, while the AIC-based detector performs best. The use of composite biomarkers increases the probability of detecting an outbreak compared to using CRP alone. These results can help epidemiologists select mathematical approaches based on the volume of incoming data.

Related

  1. Beyond evacuation: building epidemic-resilient global surgery partnerships in an era of recurrent Ebola outbreaks
    Felix Oyania, Moris Baluku, Eden Belay Tilahun
    BMJ Global HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCDOAJ
  2. A model for mosquito-borne epidemic outbreaks with information-dependent protective behaviour.
    Simone De Reggi, Andrea Pugliese, Mattia Sensi +1
    Journal of mathematical biologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  3. Evaluation of Deep Learning Based Early Warning Indicators of Epidemic Outbreaks
    B. Ayyorgun, A. Adiga, M. Marathe
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  4. Methods for cost-efficient, whole genome sequencing surveillance for enhanced detection of outbreaks in a hospital setting
    Kady D. Waggle, Marissa Pacey Griffith, Alecia B. Rokes +12
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text7 citedGenetics & genomicsEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  5. Recommendations for the analysis of leading indicators in epidemic surveillance
    Jonathon Mellor, Maria Tang, Robert S. Paton +1
    PLOS Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceStatisticsPLOS
BibTeX
@misc{klochkov2026detecting,
  title = {{Detecting epidemic outbreaks with routine blood tests: A comparison of surveillance methods using COVID-19 simulations and real-world seasonal disease data}},
  author = {K. A. Klochkov and I. I. Maslova and E. N. Ilina and A. I. Manolov},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.27.26364498},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.26364498v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Detecting epidemic outbreaks with routine blood tests: A comparison of surveillance methods using COVID-19 simulations and real-world seasonal disease data
AU  - K. A. Klochkov
AU  - I. I. Maslova
AU  - E. N. Ilina
AU  - A. I. Manolov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.27.26364498
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.26364498v1
AB  - Timely detection of an epidemic outbreak is essential for implementing interventions and limiting the spread of the pathogen. The digitalization of healthcare has led to the availability of up-to-date, large-scale data on routinely tested blood parameters. This data can be used to detect the onset of an epidemic, which is particularly important when a new, previously unknown pathogen emerges for which no testing systems are available. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of various mathematical approaches for detecting an epidemic based on routinely collected blood test results. The evaluation was performed using both simulated and real-world data. First, we developed the BloodCovasim agent-based model, which defines the dependency of C-reactive protein (CRP) on time for each individual based on the course of their disease and simulates blood analysis. Using synthetic data from thousands of BloodCovasim simulations, we determined the characteristics of different methods of epidemic outbreak detection under controlled conditions. Second, we used the same methods but applied them to real-world data on CRP from Russia during a period of increased seasonal infectious diseases (rhinoviruses, adenoviruses, seasonal coronaviruses) associated with the back-to-school effect. Third, we compared the CRP-based detection method with methods based on a set of inflammatory biomarkers obtained from complete blood count (CBC) results. As a result, we found that the applicability of the methods depends on the volume of incoming data. With large amounts of data, they demonstrate similar results in terms of the probability of detecting an outbreak. As the number of tests decreases, detection methods based on basic statistical tests lose accuracy faster than those based on moving averages, while the AIC-based detector performs best. The use of composite biomarkers increases the probability of detecting an outbreak compared to using CRP alone. These results can help epidemiologists select mathematical approaches based on the volume of incoming data.
ER  -