Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ACS Omega

Painted Reinforced Concrete as an Alternative to Galvanized Steel in Chloride-Rich Environments

  1. 1Electric Energy Research Center (Cepel) , , , ,
  2. 2Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) , , , ,

Abstract

Galvanization is one of the most common anticorrosive techniques for the protection of metallic structures in atmospheric applications. However, in extremely aggressive atmospheric environments, the material fails to deliver its usual performance, and replacement can be necessary, as in this case study. Painted reinforced concrete has emerged as a promising alternative for extending the service life and enhancing corrosion resistance. They combine the barrier and passivation mechanisms associated with steel reinforcement embedded in concrete with the anticorrosive protection provided by the high-performance coating systems. In this context, this work evaluated the performance of combinations of carbon steel and galvanized steel reinforcement concrete with three commercial coating systems (CS1, CS2, and CS3) under severe conditions expected at the installation site. The test specimens were manufactured using Brazilian CPII cement concrete, and the performance of galvanized steel was assessed in comparison to the expected behavior of carbon steel. Concrete characterization tests were conducted to verify its suitability for the intended application, including water absorption, void index, bulk density, and compressive strength tests, and salt spray exposure tests were performed to assess the anticorrosive performance of the different combinations. Each coating system was individually characterized using techniques to measure its physical and barrier properties, and the reinforcing steels were evaluated for their mechanical properties and chemical compositions. Electrochemical methods, including open-circuit potential monitoring, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and polarization resistance, were used to complement the other analyses. The results indicated that the traditional carbon-steel-and-concrete system exhibited a superior anticorrosive performance. Even after long-term exposure to salt spray, the specific influence of each coating system applied to the concrete could not be clearly distinguished, given its excellent anticorrosive performance. Despite this, CS3 consistently showed favorable results in the characterization tests and was therefore selected for the final application.

Related

  1. Chloride Transport Resistance, Concrete Cover Performance, and Service-Life Assessment of Reinforced Concrete under Brazilian Durability Requirements
    Thalles Murilo Santos de Almeida, Wanderson Santos de Jesus, Flávia Araujo Azevedo +2
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryCrossrefPMC
  2. Experimental Study on the Shear Transfer Resistance of Uncracked Concrete Interfaces Reinforced with GFRP
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
  3. Research on strengthening of T-shaped reinforced concrete simply supported beams with U-shaped jackets to enlarge the cross-section: Theoretical analysis, experiments, and finite element analysis
    Jian-fa Wang, En-he Bao, Ming-su Zhou +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersGeneral mathematicsPLOSPMC
  4. Sulfate resistance of polyvinyl alcohol and basalt fibers reinforced red mud concrete
    Fuchao Xu, Ao Liu, Zhen Liu +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersPLOS
  5. Multi-Scale Degradation Behavior and Durability of BF-WEP Modified Concrete Under Saline Environments
    Zhen Zhang, Lingtong Zhang, Liming Zhang +4
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{matera2026painted,
  title = {{Painted Reinforced Concrete as an Alternative to Galvanized Steel in Chloride-Rich Environments}},
  author = {Helga S. Matera and Elber V. Bendinelli and Felipe G. Nunes and Simone L. D. C. Brasil},
  journal = {ACS Omega},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1021/acsomega.6c06600},
  url = {https://pubs.acs.org/acsodf/article/11/41/63245/5445862/Painted-Reinforced-Concrete-as-an-Alternative-to},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Painted Reinforced Concrete as an Alternative to Galvanized Steel in Chloride-Rich Environments
AU  - Helga S. Matera
AU  - Elber V. Bendinelli
AU  - Felipe G. Nunes
AU  - Simone L. D. C. Brasil
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - ACS Omega
DO  - 10.1021/acsomega.6c06600
UR  - https://pubs.acs.org/acsodf/article/11/41/63245/5445862/Painted-Reinforced-Concrete-as-an-Alternative-to
AB  - Galvanization is one of the most common anticorrosive techniques for the protection of metallic structures in atmospheric applications. However, in extremely aggressive atmospheric environments, the material fails to deliver its usual performance, and replacement can be necessary, as in this case study. Painted reinforced concrete has emerged as a promising alternative for extending the service life and enhancing corrosion resistance. They combine the barrier and passivation mechanisms associated with steel reinforcement embedded in concrete with the anticorrosive protection provided by the high-performance coating systems. In this context, this work evaluated the performance of combinations of carbon steel and galvanized steel reinforcement concrete with three commercial coating systems (CS1, CS2, and CS3) under severe conditions expected at the installation site. The test specimens were manufactured using Brazilian CPII cement concrete, and the performance of galvanized steel was assessed in comparison to the expected behavior of carbon steel. Concrete characterization tests were conducted to verify its suitability for the intended application, including water absorption, void index, bulk density, and compressive strength tests, and salt spray exposure tests were performed to assess the anticorrosive performance of the different combinations. Each coating system was individually characterized using techniques to measure its physical and barrier properties, and the reinforcing steels were evaluated for their mechanical properties and chemical compositions. Electrochemical methods, including open-circuit potential monitoring, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and polarization resistance, were used to complement the other analyses. The results indicated that the traditional carbon-steel-and-concrete system exhibited a superior anticorrosive performance. Even after long-term exposure to salt spray, the specific influence of each coating system applied to the concrete could not be clearly distinguished, given its excellent anticorrosive performance. Despite this, CS3 consistently showed favorable results in the characterization tests and was therefore selected for the final application.
SN  - 2470-1343
ER  -