Urban aquatic ecosystems for human health and well-being – a scoping review
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Identifying relevant, measurable health indicators is essential for targeting interventions and monitoring outcomes. Urban aquatic ecosystems (UAEs) provide ecosystem services, e.g. water-quality regulation, flood and temperature buffering, and contact with nature that are known to support physical and mental health. However, most articles focusing on UAEs examine environmental risks instead of human health outcomes. The aim of this scoping review was therefore to identify human health and well-being indicators associated with UAEs as reported in the literature and to map them to the WHO Global Reference List of Core Health Indicators. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted, including complementary desk research, following the Joanna Briggs Institute nine-phase method, from defining the objective to summarising the results. A literature search in three databases returned N = 5,099 records. Screening was done independently by the authors in two iterations; title/abstract and then full text using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty-two articles were selected. RESULTS: Three health indicator domains within the health status category, one health status indicator group, and two risk related indicators associated with UAEs were identified. Within WHO's health status indicator category, health indicator domains mental health, physical health, well-being, as well as the indicator group cause-specific mortality were found. Within WHO's risk factor indicator category, the health indicators "age-standardised prevalence of insufficiently physically active persons aged 18+ years" and "age-standardised prevalence of overweight and obesity in persons aged 18 + years" were identified. Mental and physical health and well-being were mainly assessed through self-report, whereas disease-specific indicators (e.g. prevalence, mortality) were predominantly based on registry or clinical data. CONCLUSION: This scoping review indicates that the available literature generally reports beneficial associations between UAEs and the identified health indicators, indicator group and domains; for example, improved mental and physical health, greater well-being, increased physical activity, and reduced mortality. The mapping points to several WHO-aligned indicators that merit further investigation, including those capturing potential negative impacts, such as water-related morbidity and mortality. To better assess hazards and causal pathways, future research should not only link environmental and health metrics, but do so using standardised, comparable indicators across studies and settings.
Related
- One health perspectives on pharmaceutical and clinical effluents driving multidrug resistance in aquatic ecosystems: a comprehensive review.
- Analytical Approaches for Detection, Characterization, and Environmental Significance of Suspended Particulate Matter in Aquatic Systems: A Scoping Review.
- Artificial plastic substrate for tracking and exploring antimicrobial-resistant bacteria transmission pathways in aquatic ecosystems
- Metagenomic Bioprospecting of Bioremediation-Related Genes in Amazonian Aquatic Ecosystems.
- From contaminated waters to living ecosystems: Heavy-metal remediation as a driver of aquatic habitat and biodiversity restoration
BibTeX
@article{morch2026urban,
title = {{Urban aquatic ecosystems for human health and well-being – a scoping review}},
author = {May Linn Bokma Mørch and Dirk S Schmeller and Ângela Freitas and Carina Dantas and Sónia Serra and Maria João Feio and Georgios Koutalieris and Oscar Tamburis and Adriano Tramontano and Stratos Kokolakis and Catherine Chronaki and Anne Moen and Silje Havrevold Henni},
journal = {BMC Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28432-8},
url = {https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-05775602v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Urban aquatic ecosystems for human health and well-being – a scoping review
AU - May Linn Bokma Mørch
AU - Dirk S Schmeller
AU - Ângela Freitas
AU - Carina Dantas
AU - Sónia Serra
AU - Maria João Feio
AU - Georgios Koutalieris
AU - Oscar Tamburis
AU - Adriano Tramontano
AU - Stratos Kokolakis
AU - Catherine Chronaki
AU - Anne Moen
AU - Silje Havrevold Henni
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/16
JO - BMC Public Health
DO - 10.1186/s12889-026-28432-8
UR - https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-05775602v1
AB - INTRODUCTION: Identifying relevant, measurable health indicators is essential for targeting interventions and monitoring outcomes. Urban aquatic ecosystems (UAEs) provide ecosystem services, e.g. water-quality regulation, flood and temperature buffering, and contact with nature that are known to support physical and mental health. However, most articles focusing on UAEs examine environmental risks instead of human health outcomes. The aim of this scoping review was therefore to identify human health and well-being indicators associated with UAEs as reported in the literature and to map them to the WHO Global Reference List of Core Health Indicators. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted, including complementary desk research, following the Joanna Briggs Institute nine-phase method, from defining the objective to summarising the results. A literature search in three databases returned N = 5,099 records. Screening was done independently by the authors in two iterations; title/abstract and then full text using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty-two articles were selected. RESULTS: Three health indicator domains within the health status category, one health status indicator group, and two risk related indicators associated with UAEs were identified. Within WHO's health status indicator category, health indicator domains mental health, physical health, well-being, as well as the indicator group cause-specific mortality were found. Within WHO's risk factor indicator category, the health indicators "age-standardised prevalence of insufficiently physically active persons aged 18+ years" and "age-standardised prevalence of overweight and obesity in persons aged 18 + years" were identified. Mental and physical health and well-being were mainly assessed through self-report, whereas disease-specific indicators (e.g. prevalence, mortality) were predominantly based on registry or clinical data. CONCLUSION: This scoping review indicates that the available literature generally reports beneficial associations between UAEs and the identified health indicators, indicator group and domains; for example, improved mental and physical health, greater well-being, increased physical activity, and reduced mortality. The mapping points to several WHO-aligned indicators that merit further investigation, including those capturing potential negative impacts, such as water-related morbidity and mortality. To better assess hazards and causal pathways, future research should not only link environmental and health metrics, but do so using standardised, comparable indicators across studies and settings.
SN - 1471-2458
SN - 1471-2458
ER -