Sinicization of the Tele⁃Pulmonary Rehabilitation Acceptance Scale and its reliability and validity test
Abstract
ObjectiveTo translate the Tele⁃Pulmonary Rehabilitation Acceptance Scale(TPRAS) into Chinese and to test its reliability and validity.MethodsThe TPRAS was translated,back⁃translated,reviewed by the original author,adapted cross⁃culturally and pilot survey.Chinese version of the TPRAS was formed.A total of 397 patients with chronic respiratory diseases recruited from outpatient and inpatient departments of two tertiary grade A general hospitals in Changsha city,Hunan province were selected as the research subjects from April to September,2023 to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the TPRAS.ResultsThe Chinese version of the TPRAS consisted of one dimension of intention to use,with a total of 13 items.Exploratory factor analysis extracted one common factor,accounting for 64.022% of the cumulative variance.Confirmatory factor analysis presented the following model fit indices:χ²/ν=1.619,RMSEA=0.053,RMR=0.017,Tucker⁃Lewis index(TLI)=0.975,CFI=0.981,IFI=0.981,and GFI=0.937.The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.952.The test⁃retest reliability was 0.960.The scale⁃level content validity index(S⁃CVI) was 0.846.The item⁃level content validity index(I⁃CVI) ranged from 0.875 to 1.000.ConclusionsThe Chinese version of the TPRAS has good reliability and validity.It can be used as an effective instrument to evaluate the acceptance of tele⁃pulmonary rehabilitation among Chinese patients with chronic respiratory diseases.
Related
- Sinicization of the Psychological Independence Scale and its reliability and validity testing among community⁃dwelling older adults in China
- Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Sleep Problem Acceptance Questionnaire
- Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of three seated trunk control assessments used during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation
- The Reliability and Validity of a Novel Isometric Trunk Rotation Strength Test
- Validity and Reliability of the Turkish While-In-Bed-Smartphone-Use-Induced Sleep Procrastination Scale
BibTeX
@article{qiqi2026sinicization,
title = {{Sinicization of the Tele⁃Pulmonary Rehabilitation Acceptance Scale and its reliability and validity test}},
author = {HU Qiqi and ZHANG Liuyi and KUAI Zhongkai and LIU Zhaoping and HU Yanjun and SONG Ying and XU Xianghong},
journal = {Huli yanjiu},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
url = {http://hlyj.suo1.cn/thesisDetails#10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2026.22.012},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Sinicization of the Tele⁃Pulmonary Rehabilitation Acceptance Scale and its reliability and validity test
AU - HU Qiqi
AU - ZHANG Liuyi
AU - KUAI Zhongkai
AU - LIU Zhaoping
AU - HU Yanjun
AU - SONG Ying
AU - XU Xianghong
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/07
JO - Huli yanjiu
UR - http://hlyj.suo1.cn/thesisDetails#10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2026.22.012
AB - ObjectiveTo translate the Tele⁃Pulmonary Rehabilitation Acceptance Scale(TPRAS) into Chinese and to test its reliability and validity.MethodsThe TPRAS was translated,back⁃translated,reviewed by the original author,adapted cross⁃culturally and pilot survey.Chinese version of the TPRAS was formed.A total of 397 patients with chronic respiratory diseases recruited from outpatient and inpatient departments of two tertiary grade A general hospitals in Changsha city,Hunan province were selected as the research subjects from April to September,2023 to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the TPRAS.ResultsThe Chinese version of the TPRAS consisted of one dimension of intention to use,with a total of 13 items.Exploratory factor analysis extracted one common factor,accounting for 64.022% of the cumulative variance.Confirmatory factor analysis presented the following model fit indices:χ²/ν=1.619,RMSEA=0.053,RMR=0.017,Tucker⁃Lewis index(TLI)=0.975,CFI=0.981,IFI=0.981,and GFI=0.937.The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.952.The test⁃retest reliability was 0.960.The scale⁃level content validity index(S⁃CVI) was 0.846.The item⁃level content validity index(I⁃CVI) ranged from 0.875 to 1.000.ConclusionsThe Chinese version of the TPRAS has good reliability and validity.It can be used as an effective instrument to evaluate the acceptance of tele⁃pulmonary rehabilitation among Chinese patients with chronic respiratory diseases.
SN - 1009-6493
ER -