Associations between couples’ work–life balance and pregnant women’s quality of life in Japan: a cross-sectional dyadic study
- 1Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University
- 2Faculty of Nursing and Social Welfare Sciences, Fukui Prefectural University
Abstract
Background In dual-income couples, maintaining pregnant women’s quality of life (QOL) while achieving work–life balance (WLB) is essential. This study examined the association between WLB and pregnant women’s QOL among dual-income couples at different stages of pregnancy. Methods This cross-sectional, dyadic study included pregnant women and their husbands (N = 150 couples). Paired questionnaires were distributed in cooperation with obstetric facilities in Japan. Participants were categorized into the first, second, and third trimesters for stratified analysis. WLB was assessed using the Japanese version of the Survey Work–Home Interaction–Nijmegen (SWING-J), which comprises four subscales: work-to-family negative spillover (WFNS), family-to-work negative spillover, work-to-family positive spillover, and family-to-work positive spillover (FWPS). QOL was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed after adjusting for marital relationship quality (Quality Marriage Index). Results No significant association was observed between WLB and QOL in the first and second trimesters. In the third trimester, higher WFNS among pregnant women was significantly associated with lower QOL (aOR = 0.179, 95% CI = 0.038–0.832). Regarding husbands’ WLB, higher WFNS was positively associated with pregnant women’s QOL (aOR = 11.168, 95% CI = 1.443–86.419), whereas higher FWPS was negatively associated with pregnant women’s QOL (aOR = 0.063, 95% CI = 0.007–0.554). Conclusion In the third trimester, pregnant women’s QOL was associated with both negative and positive aspects of WLB at the couple level. Higher WFNS among pregnant women and higher FWPS among husbands were associated with a lower QOL, whereas higher WFNS was associated with a higher QOL. These findings suggest that multiple WLB-related factors, both negative and positive, are linked to pregnant women’s QOL, highlighting the importance of considering complex spillover dynamics when supporting maternal well-being in dual-income households.
Related
- Analysis of the subject-object effects and chain mediation of psychosocial factors in couples during late pregnancy on depression: a cross-sectional study of pregnant women and their spouses
- History of miscarriage and quality of life in couples undergoing medically assisted reproduction: an exploratory couple-based cross-sectional study
- Associations Between Antenatal Care and Information and Pregnant Women's Preferred Mode of Birth in Romania: A Cross-Sectional Study.
- Organizational patient safety culture and workforce well-being among healthcare workers: associations with resilience and work-life balance in a hospital-wide cross-sectional study.
- Associations between routine systemic biochemical indices and semen quality: a cross-sectional study in men undergoing health examination
BibTeX
@article{makino2026associations,
title = {{Associations between couples’ work–life balance and pregnant women’s quality of life in Japan: a cross-sectional dyadic study}},
author = {Aoi Makino and Shigemi Iriyama},
journal = {BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12884-026-09733-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09733-7},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Associations between couples’ work–life balance and pregnant women’s quality of life in Japan: a cross-sectional dyadic study
AU - Aoi Makino
AU - Shigemi Iriyama
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
DO - 10.1186/s12884-026-09733-7
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09733-7
AB - Background In dual-income couples, maintaining pregnant women’s quality of life (QOL) while achieving work–life balance (WLB) is essential. This study examined the association between WLB and pregnant women’s QOL among dual-income couples at different stages of pregnancy. Methods This cross-sectional, dyadic study included pregnant women and their husbands (N = 150 couples). Paired questionnaires were distributed in cooperation with obstetric facilities in Japan. Participants were categorized into the first, second, and third trimesters for stratified analysis. WLB was assessed using the Japanese version of the Survey Work–Home Interaction–Nijmegen (SWING-J), which comprises four subscales: work-to-family negative spillover (WFNS), family-to-work negative spillover, work-to-family positive spillover, and family-to-work positive spillover (FWPS). QOL was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed after adjusting for marital relationship quality (Quality Marriage Index). Results No significant association was observed between WLB and QOL in the first and second trimesters. In the third trimester, higher WFNS among pregnant women was significantly associated with lower QOL (aOR = 0.179, 95% CI = 0.038–0.832). Regarding husbands’ WLB, higher WFNS was positively associated with pregnant women’s QOL (aOR = 11.168, 95% CI = 1.443–86.419), whereas higher FWPS was negatively associated with pregnant women’s QOL (aOR = 0.063, 95% CI = 0.007–0.554). Conclusion In the third trimester, pregnant women’s QOL was associated with both negative and positive aspects of WLB at the couple level. Higher WFNS among pregnant women and higher FWPS among husbands were associated with a lower QOL, whereas higher WFNS was associated with a higher QOL. These findings suggest that multiple WLB-related factors, both negative and positive, are linked to pregnant women’s QOL, highlighting the importance of considering complex spillover dynamics when supporting maternal well-being in dual-income households.
SN - 1471-2393
ER -