Longitudinal Radiographic Outcomes and Revision Burden After Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Treatment for Early-Onset Scoliosis
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Türkiye
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Hitit University Çorum Erol Olçok Education and Research Hospital, Corum 19000, Türkiye
- 3Department of Biostatistics, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale 71450, Türkiye
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara 06800, Türkiye
Abstract
Background: To evaluate longitudinal radiographic outcomes, exploratory radiographic response, and planned versus unplanned revision burden after magnetically controlled growing rod treatment in patients with early-onset scoliosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 55 patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with magnetically controlled growing rods at a single center. Complete year-3 radiographic measurements were available for 40 patients; therefore, year-3 estimates were conditional on imaging availability. Cobb angle, T1–S1 length, and apical vertebral translation (AVT) were assessed preoperatively and at postoperative years 1, 2, and 3. Longitudinal changes were evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Exploratory radiographic responder endpoints included ≥20° Cobb correction, ≥30% Cobb correction, and a ≥30 mm preoperative-to-year-3 T1–S1 length difference. Freedom from unplanned revision and composite endpoints were also evaluated. The radiographic thresholds were pragmatic and were not validated measures of clinically important improvement. Results: The cohort included 33 female and 22 male patients, with a mean age at surgery of 8.10 ± 1.86 years. Neuromuscular and congenital scoliosis accounted for 41.8% and 40.0% of cases, respectively, and dual-rod constructs were used in 83.6%. At year 3, mean Cobb angle was 40.15° ± 19.03°, mean radiographic T1–S1 length was 383.02 ± 54.42 mm, and mean AVT was 32.80 ± 23.56 mm among 40 patients with complete measurements. GEE models showed significant reductions in Cobb angle and AVT and increases in T1–S1 length at each postoperative year (all p < 0.001). At year 3, ≥20° Cobb correction, ≥30% Cobb correction, and ≥30 mm preoperative-to-year-3 T1–S1 length difference were achieved in 50.0%, 55.0%, and 67.5% of patients, respectively; 35.0% achieved both radiographic thresholds and 25.0% achieved both thresholds with no recorded unplanned revision. Patient-level fields recorded any complication in 20.0%, unplanned revision in 16.4%, internal revision classification in 43.6%, and definitive fusion in 16.4%; these fields were not treated as mutually exclusive. Conclusions: MCGR treatment was associated with longitudinal radiographic improvement among patients with available measurements. The preoperative-to-year-3 T1–S1 difference includes the effect of index surgery and should not be interpreted as biological spinal growth alone. These findings suggest that MCGR success should be assessed not only by curve correction, but also by measured spinal-length gain and revision burden.
Related
- Radiographic Evaluation of Scoliosis in Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Patients: Associations Between Curve Severity, Localization, and Skeletal Maturity
- Predicting the Risk of Distal Junctional Kyphosis After Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Preoperative Radiographic Indicators and Machine Learning
- Discrepancy Between Radiographic Correction and Cosmetic Improvement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Role of Extremely Low BMI.
- Immediate height gain during scoliosis brace fitting as a predictor of in-brace skeletal correction: A non-radiographic clinical indicator.
- School-based scoliosis screening among 73,509 students in Zhangye, Northwest China: epidemiological characteristics, 7-day non-completion in the radiographic diagnostic cascade, and an exploratory case–control analysis
BibTeX
@article{unsal2026longitudinal,
title = {{Longitudinal Radiographic Outcomes and Revision Burden After Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Treatment for Early-Onset Scoliosis}},
author = {Yasar Unsal and Kadir Cetinkaya and Recai Kulak and Erva Eser and Ercan Bal},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15208049},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8049},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Longitudinal Radiographic Outcomes and Revision Burden After Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Treatment for Early-Onset Scoliosis
AU - Yasar Unsal
AU - Kadir Cetinkaya
AU - Recai Kulak
AU - Erva Eser
AU - Ercan Bal
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15208049
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8049
AB - Background: To evaluate longitudinal radiographic outcomes, exploratory radiographic response, and planned versus unplanned revision burden after magnetically controlled growing rod treatment in patients with early-onset scoliosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 55 patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with magnetically controlled growing rods at a single center. Complete year-3 radiographic measurements were available for 40 patients; therefore, year-3 estimates were conditional on imaging availability. Cobb angle, T1–S1 length, and apical vertebral translation (AVT) were assessed preoperatively and at postoperative years 1, 2, and 3. Longitudinal changes were evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Exploratory radiographic responder endpoints included ≥20° Cobb correction, ≥30% Cobb correction, and a ≥30 mm preoperative-to-year-3 T1–S1 length difference. Freedom from unplanned revision and composite endpoints were also evaluated. The radiographic thresholds were pragmatic and were not validated measures of clinically important improvement. Results: The cohort included 33 female and 22 male patients, with a mean age at surgery of 8.10 ± 1.86 years. Neuromuscular and congenital scoliosis accounted for 41.8% and 40.0% of cases, respectively, and dual-rod constructs were used in 83.6%. At year 3, mean Cobb angle was 40.15° ± 19.03°, mean radiographic T1–S1 length was 383.02 ± 54.42 mm, and mean AVT was 32.80 ± 23.56 mm among 40 patients with complete measurements. GEE models showed significant reductions in Cobb angle and AVT and increases in T1–S1 length at each postoperative year (all p < 0.001). At year 3, ≥20° Cobb correction, ≥30% Cobb correction, and ≥30 mm preoperative-to-year-3 T1–S1 length difference were achieved in 50.0%, 55.0%, and 67.5% of patients, respectively; 35.0% achieved both radiographic thresholds and 25.0% achieved both thresholds with no recorded unplanned revision. Patient-level fields recorded any complication in 20.0%, unplanned revision in 16.4%, internal revision classification in 43.6%, and definitive fusion in 16.4%; these fields were not treated as mutually exclusive. Conclusions: MCGR treatment was associated with longitudinal radiographic improvement among patients with available measurements. The preoperative-to-year-3 T1–S1 difference includes the effect of index surgery and should not be interpreted as biological spinal growth alone. These findings suggest that MCGR success should be assessed not only by curve correction, but also by measured spinal-length gain and revision burden.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -